Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Chirurgia Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.21614/chirurgia.3006
Amr Kamaledin Ebrahim, Omar Lasheen, Sherif Mokhtar, Shaimaa Lasheen, Mohamed Hassan, Emad Khallaf
{"title":"Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.","authors":"Amr Kamaledin Ebrahim, Omar Lasheen, Sherif Mokhtar, Shaimaa Lasheen, Mohamed Hassan, Emad Khallaf","doi":"10.21614/chirurgia.3006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The evolution of axillary management in breast cancer has witnessed significant changes in recent decades, leading to an overall reduction in surgical interventions. There have been notable shifts in practice, aiming to minimize morbidity while maintaining oncologic outcomes and accurate staging for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. These advancements have been facilitated by the improved efficacy of adjuvant therapies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and loco-regional axillary radiotherapy (ART) on lymphedema and disease recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) cases that have shown a downstaging of their axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Material and <b>Methods:</b> Sixty patients with LABC with an initial cN1-2 disease showed a downstaging of their axillary status to cN0 after NACT. They were randomized into two groups. The first group (the control group) underwent ALND, while the second group (the study group) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-operative ART. Patients with failed SLNB or positive SLNB were excluded. All patients were followed up for loco-regional recurrence and lymphedema for at least one year. <b>Results:</b> No Statistical significance was found between both groups regarding loco-regional recurrence. There was a higher rate of arm lymphedema in the control group. Lymphedema was found in 46.7% of patients who underwent ALND, compared to 13.4% in the study group (patients with SLNB and radiotherapy).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Axillary radiation after SNLB has shown no difference regarding axillary recurrence when compared to ALND. However, our results were in favor of radiation concerning lymphedema. With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC.</p><p><strong>Key message: </strong>With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC for patient who have shown down-staging of their axillary status after NACT. Radiotherapy can show better results in the long term with regards lymphedema.</p>","PeriodicalId":10171,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgia","volume":"119 Ahead of print","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21614/chirurgia.3006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The evolution of axillary management in breast cancer has witnessed significant changes in recent decades, leading to an overall reduction in surgical interventions. There have been notable shifts in practice, aiming to minimize morbidity while maintaining oncologic outcomes and accurate staging for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. These advancements have been facilitated by the improved efficacy of adjuvant therapies.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and loco-regional axillary radiotherapy (ART) on lymphedema and disease recurrence in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) cases that have shown a downstaging of their axillary status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Material and Methods: Sixty patients with LABC with an initial cN1-2 disease showed a downstaging of their axillary status to cN0 after NACT. They were randomized into two groups. The first group (the control group) underwent ALND, while the second group (the study group) had a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-operative ART. Patients with failed SLNB or positive SLNB were excluded. All patients were followed up for loco-regional recurrence and lymphedema for at least one year. Results: No Statistical significance was found between both groups regarding loco-regional recurrence. There was a higher rate of arm lymphedema in the control group. Lymphedema was found in 46.7% of patients who underwent ALND, compared to 13.4% in the study group (patients with SLNB and radiotherapy).

Conclusion: Axillary radiation after SNLB has shown no difference regarding axillary recurrence when compared to ALND. However, our results were in favor of radiation concerning lymphedema. With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC.

Key message: With all the ongoing research aiming at reducing axillary surgery, this study could be an initiative for a new strategy in LABC for patient who have shown down-staging of their axillary status after NACT. Radiotherapy can show better results in the long term with regards lymphedema.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腋窝淋巴结清扫术与局部区域放疗在新辅助化疗后结节阴性局部晚期乳腺癌腋窝治疗中的比较
背景:近几十年来,乳腺癌的腋窝治疗发生了重大变化,导致手术干预的总体减少。临床实践发生了显著变化,旨在最大限度地降低发病率,同时保持新诊断乳腺癌患者的肿瘤治疗效果和准确分期。这些进步得益于辅助疗法疗效的提高:目的:比较腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)和局部区域腋窝放疗(ART)对淋巴水肿和局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)病例疾病复发的影响。材料与方法:60例最初病变为cN1-2的局部晚期乳腺癌(LABC)患者在接受新辅助化疗(NACT)后,腋窝病变缩小至cN0。他们被随机分为两组。第一组(对照组)接受 ALND,第二组(研究组)接受前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)和术后 ART。前哨淋巴结活检失败或阳性的患者被排除在外。所有患者都接受了至少一年的局部区域复发和淋巴水肿随访。结果两组患者的局部区域复发率无统计学意义。对照组的手臂淋巴水肿发生率较高。接受ALND治疗的患者中46.7%出现淋巴水肿,而研究组(接受SLNB和放疗的患者)中只有13.4%出现淋巴水肿:结论:SNLB术后腋窝放疗与ALND术后腋窝放疗在腋窝复发方面没有区别。结论:SNLB术后腋窝放疗与ALND术后腋窝放疗在腋窝复发方面没有差异,但在淋巴水肿方面,我们的结果更倾向于放疗。目前正在进行的所有研究都旨在减少腋窝手术,这项研究可能会成为LABC新策略的一个倡议:目前正在进行的所有研究都旨在减少腋窝手术,这项研究可能是针对NACT术后腋窝分期减低的LABC患者的一项新策略。放疗在淋巴水肿方面的长期效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chirurgia
Chirurgia Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Chirurgia is a bimonthly journal. In Chirurgia, original papers in the area of general surgery which neither appeared, nor were sent for publication in other periodicals, can be published. You can send original articles, new surgical techniques, or comprehensive general reports on surgical topics, clinical case presentations and, depending on publication space, - reviews of some articles of general interest to surgeons from other publications. Chirurgia is also a place for sharing information about the activity of various branches of the Romanian Society of Surgery, information on Congresses and Symposiums organized by the Romanian Society of Surgery and participation notes in other scientific meetings. Letters to the editor: Letters commenting on papers published in Chirurgia are welcomed. They should contain substantive ideas and commentaries supported by appropriate data, and should not exceed 2 pages. Please submit these letters to the editor through our online system.
期刊最新文献
Ramp Lesions with ACL Injuries Between MRI and Arthroscopic Evaluation. Axillary Lymph Node Dissection versus Loco-regional Radiotherapy in Management of the Axilla in Node-Negative Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Post Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Burn Injuries in the Pediatric Population - The Experience of a Single Center Over a Period of Two Years. Cold Ischemia Time as a Risk Factor for Graft Dysfunction Types in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Current Evidence of Single-Port Laparoscopic versus Single Port-Robotic Techniques in Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1