A comparative study between methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone as an initial anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-label randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM BMC Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1186/s12890-024-03364-4
Jakkrit Laikitmongkhon, Tanapat Tassaneyasin, Yuda Sutherasan, Angsana Phuphuakrat, Sirawat Srichatrapimuk, Tananchai Petnak, Dararat Eksombatchai, Kanin Thammavaranucupt, Somnuek Sungkanuparph
{"title":"A comparative study between methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone as an initial anti-inflammatory treatment of moderate COVID-19 pneumonia: an open-label randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Jakkrit Laikitmongkhon, Tanapat Tassaneyasin, Yuda Sutherasan, Angsana Phuphuakrat, Sirawat Srichatrapimuk, Tananchai Petnak, Dararat Eksombatchai, Kanin Thammavaranucupt, Somnuek Sungkanuparph","doi":"10.1186/s12890-024-03364-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The most appropriate anti-inflammatory treatment for moderate COVID-19 pneumonia remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of a high-dose methylprednisolone versus a high-dose dexamethasone in hospitalized moderate COVID-19 pneumonia, regarding the WHO clinical progression scales, mortality, and the length of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this open-labeled randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients with age > 18 years old who were diagnosed moderate COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by real-time PCR, evidence of pneumonia by chest imaging and resting oxygen saturation between 90 and 94%. Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive methylprednisolone 250 mg/day or dexamethasone 20 mg/day over the first three days. Then the patients in both groups received dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 4-5, and 10 mg/day on days 6-10. Primary outcome was assessed by a 10-point WHO clinical progression scales ranging from uninfected (point 0) to death (point 10) on the fifth day of treatment. Secondary outcomes including 90-day mortality, length of hospitalization, rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and complications were determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 eligible patients, the mean age was 76.0 ± 13.3 years. The median date of illness at the time of randomization was 3 days (interquartile range 2, 5). Baseline clinical characteristics and severity did not differ between groups. The WHO clinical progression scales were similar between methylprednisolone and dexamethasone group at 5 and 10 days of treatment [4.84, (95% confidence interval(CI), 4.35-5.33) vs. 4.76 (95% CI, 4.27-5.25), p = 0.821 and 4.32 (95% CI, 3.83-4.81) vs. 3.80 (95% CI, 3.31-4.29), p = 0.140, respectively)]. Both groups did not differ in-hospital mortality, length of hospitalization, and rate of ICU transfer. There were also no differences in steroid-related complications between groups until 90 days of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia, initial anti-inflammatory treatment with 250 mg/day of methylprednisolone for three days does not yield better outcomes over high-dose dexamethasone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered at Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 17, 2021, with the identifier TCTR20211017001.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"562"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555798/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-024-03364-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The most appropriate anti-inflammatory treatment for moderate COVID-19 pneumonia remains uncertain. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of a high-dose methylprednisolone versus a high-dose dexamethasone in hospitalized moderate COVID-19 pneumonia, regarding the WHO clinical progression scales, mortality, and the length of hospitalization.

Methods: In this open-labeled randomized controlled trial, we enrolled patients with age > 18 years old who were diagnosed moderate COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by real-time PCR, evidence of pneumonia by chest imaging and resting oxygen saturation between 90 and 94%. Patients were randomized at a 1:1 ratio to receive methylprednisolone 250 mg/day or dexamethasone 20 mg/day over the first three days. Then the patients in both groups received dexamethasone 20 mg/day on days 4-5, and 10 mg/day on days 6-10. Primary outcome was assessed by a 10-point WHO clinical progression scales ranging from uninfected (point 0) to death (point 10) on the fifth day of treatment. Secondary outcomes including 90-day mortality, length of hospitalization, rate of intensive care unit (ICU) transfer and complications were determined.

Results: Of 98 eligible patients, the mean age was 76.0 ± 13.3 years. The median date of illness at the time of randomization was 3 days (interquartile range 2, 5). Baseline clinical characteristics and severity did not differ between groups. The WHO clinical progression scales were similar between methylprednisolone and dexamethasone group at 5 and 10 days of treatment [4.84, (95% confidence interval(CI), 4.35-5.33) vs. 4.76 (95% CI, 4.27-5.25), p = 0.821 and 4.32 (95% CI, 3.83-4.81) vs. 3.80 (95% CI, 3.31-4.29), p = 0.140, respectively)]. Both groups did not differ in-hospital mortality, length of hospitalization, and rate of ICU transfer. There were also no differences in steroid-related complications between groups until 90 days of follow-up.

Conclusions: In patients with moderate COVID-19 pneumonia, initial anti-inflammatory treatment with 250 mg/day of methylprednisolone for three days does not yield better outcomes over high-dose dexamethasone.

Trial registration: This study was registered at Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 17, 2021, with the identifier TCTR20211017001.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲基强的松龙与地塞米松作为中度 COVID-19 肺炎初期抗炎治疗的比较研究:开放标签随机对照试验。
背景:中度 COVID-19 肺炎最合适的抗炎治疗方法仍不确定。我们的目的是比较大剂量甲基强的松龙和大剂量地塞米松对中度 COVID-19 肺炎住院患者在 WHO 临床进展量表、死亡率和住院时间方面的疗效:在这项开放标签随机对照试验中,我们招募了年龄大于 18 岁、经实时 PCR 确诊为中度 COVID-19 肺炎、胸部影像学检查有肺炎证据且静息血氧饱和度在 90% 至 94% 之间的患者。患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配,在头三天接受甲泼尼龙 250 毫克/天或地塞米松 20 毫克/天的治疗。然后,两组患者在第 4-5 天接受地塞米松 20 毫克/天,在第 6-10 天接受地塞米松 10 毫克/天。主要结果由 WHO 临床进展 10 级评分表评估,从未感染(0 分)到治疗第五天死亡(10 分)不等。次要结果包括 90 天死亡率、住院时间、转入重症监护室(ICU)率和并发症:在 98 名符合条件的患者中,平均年龄为 76.0±13.3 岁。随机分组时的中位发病日期为 3 天(四分位距为 2 至 5)。各组的基线临床特征和严重程度没有差异。甲泼尼龙组和地塞米松组在治疗 5 天和 10 天时的 WHO 临床进展量表相似[分别为 4.84(95% 置信区间(CI),4.35-5.33) vs. 4.76(95% CI,4.27-5.25),p = 0.821 和 4.32(95% CI,3.83-4.81) vs. 3.80(95% CI,3.31-4.29),p = 0.140]。两组患者的院内死亡率、住院时间和转入重症监护室的比例均无差异。两组患者在随访90天前的类固醇相关并发症方面也无差异:结论:对于中度 COVID-19 肺炎患者,与大剂量地塞米松相比,每天 250 毫克甲基强的松龙、持续三天的初始抗炎治疗并不能带来更好的疗效:本研究于 2021 年 10 月 17 日在泰国临床试验注册中心注册,注册号为 TCTR20211017001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of clinical outcomes between non-invasive ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula use in patients with acute pancreatitis. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing for the diagnosis and evaluation of pediatric pleural effusion: a case series. Postoperative pulmonary complications in patients with bronchiectasis following non-cardiothoracic surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis. Matrix metalloproteinases levels in induced sputum in IPF and CTD-ILD. High-dose corticosteroid application in acute severe nickel carbonyl poisoning: a case series of three occupational exposures and their recovery outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1