Exploration of fathers' mental health and well-being concerns during the transition to fatherhood, and paternal perinatal support: scoping review.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078386
Ashleigh Elizabeth Watkins, Catherine El Zerbi, Ruth McGovern, Judith Rankin
{"title":"Exploration of fathers' mental health and well-being concerns during the transition to fatherhood, and paternal perinatal support: scoping review.","authors":"Ashleigh Elizabeth Watkins, Catherine El Zerbi, Ruth McGovern, Judith Rankin","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To appraise and synthesise qualitative literature identifying: (a) fathers' concerns and challenges during the transition to fatherhood that may be impacting mental health and well-being experiences; and (b) fathers' experiences of antenatal programmes, and psychological and social support, to understand how we can better support fathers in addressing these concerns.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>International, qualitative evidence synthesis, scoping review.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, ASSIA) alongside 'grey' and supplementary searches were conducted March 2024.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Qualitative studies and qualitative data extracted from mixed methods studies focusing on fathers' mental health within the perinatal period globally were included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>The recommended Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction and critical appraisal tools were used, and an inductive thematic synthesis approach employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>37 qualitative studies were included: UK (n=11), Europe (n=9), Australia (n=7) and Asia (n=6), USA (n=1), Canada (n=1) and the Middle East (n=2). Quality appraisal scores were moderate to high (5-10). Four analytical themes and eight subthemes were generated: (1) diminished partner relationship, (2) provider or protector? Multiplicity of fatherhood identification, (3) forgotten entity within the perinatal experience and (4) \"I try to battle it myself,\" masculine ideals within fatherhood. The findings highlighted that fathers found the transition to be difficult, compounded by insecurity within their role as both partner and father. Fathers found a paucity of paternally focused support and antenatal programmes, not addressing fathers' needs within the transition.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The many concerns and challenges highlighted in the review demonstrate the importance of understanding the negative impact of the transition on fathers' mental health and well-being. There is a need for greater attention to fathers' experiences of paternal perinatal support and programmes through research and practise to inform future interventional development.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO: CRD4202231381.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078386","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To appraise and synthesise qualitative literature identifying: (a) fathers' concerns and challenges during the transition to fatherhood that may be impacting mental health and well-being experiences; and (b) fathers' experiences of antenatal programmes, and psychological and social support, to understand how we can better support fathers in addressing these concerns.

Design: International, qualitative evidence synthesis, scoping review.

Data sources: Six electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, ASSIA) alongside 'grey' and supplementary searches were conducted March 2024.

Eligibility criteria: Qualitative studies and qualitative data extracted from mixed methods studies focusing on fathers' mental health within the perinatal period globally were included.

Data extraction and synthesis: The recommended Joanna Briggs Institute data extraction and critical appraisal tools were used, and an inductive thematic synthesis approach employed.

Results: 37 qualitative studies were included: UK (n=11), Europe (n=9), Australia (n=7) and Asia (n=6), USA (n=1), Canada (n=1) and the Middle East (n=2). Quality appraisal scores were moderate to high (5-10). Four analytical themes and eight subthemes were generated: (1) diminished partner relationship, (2) provider or protector? Multiplicity of fatherhood identification, (3) forgotten entity within the perinatal experience and (4) "I try to battle it myself," masculine ideals within fatherhood. The findings highlighted that fathers found the transition to be difficult, compounded by insecurity within their role as both partner and father. Fathers found a paucity of paternally focused support and antenatal programmes, not addressing fathers' needs within the transition.

Conclusions: The many concerns and challenges highlighted in the review demonstrate the importance of understanding the negative impact of the transition on fathers' mental health and well-being. There is a need for greater attention to fathers' experiences of paternal perinatal support and programmes through research and practise to inform future interventional development.

Trial registration: PROSPERO: CRD4202231381.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨父亲在转变为父亲期间的心理健康和福祉问题,以及父亲围产期支持:范围界定综述。
目标:评估和综合定性文献,确定:(a)父亲在向父亲角色过渡期间可能影响心理健康和幸福体验的关切和挑战;(b)父亲在产前计划、心理和社会支持方面的体验,以了解我们如何更好地支持父亲解决这些关切:设计:国际性、定性证据综合、范围审查:数据来源:六个电子数据库(Medline、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus、ASSIA)以及 "灰色 "和补充检索:数据提取与综合:使用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所推荐的数据提取和批判性评价工具,并采用归纳式主题综合方法:结果:共纳入 37 项定性研究:英国(n=11)、欧洲(n=9)、澳大利亚(n=7)、亚洲(n=6)、美国(n=1)、加拿大(n=1)和中东(n=2)。质量评估分数为中高分(5-10 分)。得出了四个分析主题和八个次主题:(1) 伴侣关系减弱,(2) 供养者还是保护者?父亲身份的多重性;(3) 围产期经历中被遗忘的实体;(4) "我试着自己解决",父亲身份中的男性理想。研究结果表明,父亲们发现过渡时期是艰难的,他们作为伴侣和父亲的角色缺乏安全感。父亲们发现,以父亲为重点的支持和产前计划很少,没有满足父亲在过渡时期的需求:综述中强调的许多问题和挑战表明,了解过渡时期对父亲心理健康和幸福的负面影响非常重要。有必要通过研究和实践,更多地关注父亲在围产期支持和项目中的体验,为未来的干预发展提供信息:试验注册:PROCROPERO:CRD4202231381。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Consensus definition of a radiologically healed fistula on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn's disease: an international Delphi study. An uncertain future: perspectives of emerging adults with inflammatory bowel disease-a qualitative semistructured interview study in eastern China. Behavioural economics to improve and motivate vaccination in primary care using nudges through the electronic health record: rationale and design of the BE IMMUNE randomised clinical trial. Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence. Effects of low-dose aspirin in bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the A-Bipolar RCT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1