Supplemental oxygen for pulmonary embolism (SO-PE): study protocol for a mechanistic, randomised, blinded, cross-over study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091567
Mads Dam Lyhne, Andrew S Liteplo, Oana Alina Zeleznik, David M Dudzinski, Asger Andersen, Hamid Shokoohi, Nour Al Jalbout, Onyinyechi Franca Eke, Christina C Morone, Calvin K Huang, Thomas F Heyne, Mannudeep K Kalra, Christopher Kabrhel
{"title":"Supplemental oxygen for pulmonary embolism (SO-PE): study protocol for a mechanistic, randomised, blinded, cross-over study.","authors":"Mads Dam Lyhne, Andrew S Liteplo, Oana Alina Zeleznik, David M Dudzinski, Asger Andersen, Hamid Shokoohi, Nour Al Jalbout, Onyinyechi Franca Eke, Christina C Morone, Calvin K Huang, Thomas F Heyne, Mannudeep K Kalra, Christopher Kabrhel","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) mortality is linked to abrupt rises in pulmonary artery (PA) pressure due to mechanical obstruction and pulmonary vasoconstriction, leading to right ventricular (RV) dilation, increased RV wall tension and oxygen demand, but compromised right coronary artery oxygen supply. Oxygen is a known pulmonary vasodilator, and in preclinical animal models of PE, supplemental oxygen reduces PA pressures and improves RV function. However, the mechanisms driving these interactions, especially in humans, remain poorly understood. The overall objective of the supplemental oxygen in pulmonary embolism (SO-PE) study is to investigate the mechanisms of supplemental oxygen in patients with acute PE.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial at Massachusetts General Hospital will include adult patients with acute PE and evidence of RV dysfunction but without hypoxaemia (SaO<sub>2</sub> ≥90% on room air). We will enrol 80 patients, each serving as their own control, with 40 randomised to start on supplemental oxygen, and 40 randomised to start on room air. Over 180 min, patients will alternate between supplemental oxygen delivered by non-rebreather mask (60% FiO<sub>2</sub>) and room air (21% FiO<sub>2</sub>). The primary outcome will be the difference in pulmonary artery systolic pressure with and without oxygen. Secondary outcomes include additional echocardiographic measures, metabolomic profiles, vital signs and dyspnoea scores. Echocardiographic data will be compared by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For metabolomic analyses, we will perform multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models and calculate false discovery rate (q-value ≤0.05) to account for multiple comparisons. Data will be collected in compliance with National Institutes of Health and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) policies for data and safety monitoring.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>The SO-PE study is funded by the NHLBI and has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mass General Brigham (no. 2023P000252). The study will comply with the Helsinki Declaration on medical research involving human subjects. All participants will provide prospective, written informed consent.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT05891886.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091567","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) mortality is linked to abrupt rises in pulmonary artery (PA) pressure due to mechanical obstruction and pulmonary vasoconstriction, leading to right ventricular (RV) dilation, increased RV wall tension and oxygen demand, but compromised right coronary artery oxygen supply. Oxygen is a known pulmonary vasodilator, and in preclinical animal models of PE, supplemental oxygen reduces PA pressures and improves RV function. However, the mechanisms driving these interactions, especially in humans, remain poorly understood. The overall objective of the supplemental oxygen in pulmonary embolism (SO-PE) study is to investigate the mechanisms of supplemental oxygen in patients with acute PE.

Methods and analysis: This randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial at Massachusetts General Hospital will include adult patients with acute PE and evidence of RV dysfunction but without hypoxaemia (SaO2 ≥90% on room air). We will enrol 80 patients, each serving as their own control, with 40 randomised to start on supplemental oxygen, and 40 randomised to start on room air. Over 180 min, patients will alternate between supplemental oxygen delivered by non-rebreather mask (60% FiO2) and room air (21% FiO2). The primary outcome will be the difference in pulmonary artery systolic pressure with and without oxygen. Secondary outcomes include additional echocardiographic measures, metabolomic profiles, vital signs and dyspnoea scores. Echocardiographic data will be compared by a paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. For metabolomic analyses, we will perform multivariable mixed effects logistic regression models and calculate false discovery rate (q-value ≤0.05) to account for multiple comparisons. Data will be collected in compliance with National Institutes of Health and National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) policies for data and safety monitoring.

Ethics and dissemination: The SO-PE study is funded by the NHLBI and has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mass General Brigham (no. 2023P000252). The study will comply with the Helsinki Declaration on medical research involving human subjects. All participants will provide prospective, written informed consent.

Trial registration number: NCT05891886.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补充氧气治疗肺栓塞(SO-PE):一项机理、随机、盲法、交叉研究的研究方案。
背景:急性肺栓塞(PE)的死亡率与机械性阻塞和肺血管收缩导致的肺动脉(PA)压力突然升高有关,这会导致右心室(RV)扩张、RV 壁张力和氧需求增加,但右冠状动脉供氧却受到影响。氧气是一种已知的肺血管扩张剂,在 PE 的临床前动物模型中,补充氧气可降低 PA 压力并改善 RV 功能。然而,驱动这些相互作用的机制,尤其是在人体中的机制,仍然鲜为人知。肺栓塞患者补充氧气(SO-PE)研究的总体目标是调查急性 PE 患者补充氧气的机制:这项在马萨诸塞州总医院进行的随机、双盲、交叉试验将包括有急性 PE 和 RV 功能障碍证据但无低氧血症(室内空气中的 SaO2 ≥90%)的成年患者。我们将招募 80 名患者,每名患者作为自己的对照组,其中 40 名随机开始使用补充氧气,40 名随机开始使用室内空气。在 180 分钟内,患者将交替使用非呼吸面罩提供的补充氧气(60% FiO2)和室内空气(21% FiO2)。主要结果是吸氧和不吸氧时肺动脉收缩压的差异。次要结果包括其他超声心动图测量、代谢组学特征、生命体征和呼吸困难评分。超声心动图数据将通过配对 t 检验或 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验进行比较。对于代谢组学分析,我们将执行多变量混合效应逻辑回归模型,并计算假发现率(q 值≤0.05),以考虑多重比较。数据收集将遵守美国国立卫生研究院和美国国立心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)的数据和安全监控政策:SO-PE 研究由 NHLBI 资助,并已获得 Mass General Brigham 机构审查委员会的批准(编号:2023P000252)。该研究将遵守《赫尔辛基医学研究宣言》关于涉及人类受试者的规定。所有参与者都将提供前瞻性的书面知情同意书:试验注册号:NCT05891886。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Consensus definition of a radiologically healed fistula on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal Crohn's disease: an international Delphi study. An uncertain future: perspectives of emerging adults with inflammatory bowel disease-a qualitative semistructured interview study in eastern China. Behavioural economics to improve and motivate vaccination in primary care using nudges through the electronic health record: rationale and design of the BE IMMUNE randomised clinical trial. Economic effects of priority setting in healthcare: a scoping review of current evidence. Effects of low-dose aspirin in bipolar disorder: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the A-Bipolar RCT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1