Head-to-head study of [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [18F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY BMC Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1
Zhiying Liang, Hao Peng, Wei Li, Zhidong Liu
{"title":"Head-to-head study of [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 PET/CT and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT for non-invasive assessment of liver cancer and its immunohistochemical markers.","authors":"Zhiying Liang, Hao Peng, Wei Li, Zhidong Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the performance of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with suspected malignant liver lesions (MLL) underwent [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning. Liver lesions were visually classified as positive or negative based on their uptake level exceeding that of adjacent normal liver tissue. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were recorded for semi-quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each tracer were determined using pathological findings as the gold standard. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis provided the molecular characteristics of all MLLs. Comprehensive analysis explored correlations between these molecular markers and PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax andTBR) to identify potential associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 44 patients, with 39 confirmed cases of MLL, comprising 28 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC). For MLL detection, [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG exhibited sensitivities of 84.6% (33/39) and 76.9% (30/39), specificitiesy of 60% (3/5) and 100%(5/5), and accuracy of 81.8% (36/44) and 79.5%(35/44). Across all liver lesions, [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 significantly surpassed [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79) and TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 Vs. 3.17 ± 3.05). Notably, [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 displayed markebly elevated SUVmax in benign liver lesions (BLLs) (P = 0.032), HCCs (P = 0.005), and ICCs (P = 0.011). Lesions with hepatocyte negativity (P = 0.023), CD34 negativity(P = 0.044), and high Ki67 expression (> 30%) (P = 0.001) had higher SUVmax on [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04. Additionally, ARG-1-negative lesions demonstrated higher TBR on [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 than ARG-1-positive lesions(P = 0.018). No significant SUVmax/TBR differences were observed with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG based on these markers. A linear relationship was identified between Ki67 scores and SUVmax of [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 (R = 0.603, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>[<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04 exhibits superior performance over [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG in PET/CT evaluation of liver cancer, characterized by increased sensitivity and SUVmax/TBR. Significant correlations with molecular markers, including Ki67, suggest [<sup>18</sup>F]FAPI-04's potential for characterizing liver cancer subtypes and assessing tumor proliferation. However, further research is required to validate these findings and their clinical significance.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT05485792, Registered 01 August 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1378"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11552336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13153-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the performance of [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 in PET/CT evaluation for liver cancer lesions, with a further exploration of the associations between PET semiquantitative data and immunohistochemical markers to liver cancer.

Methods: Patients with suspected malignant liver lesions (MLL) underwent [18F]FDG and [18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT scanning. Liver lesions were visually classified as positive or negative based on their uptake level exceeding that of adjacent normal liver tissue. SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) were recorded for semi-quantitative analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of each tracer were determined using pathological findings as the gold standard. Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis provided the molecular characteristics of all MLLs. Comprehensive analysis explored correlations between these molecular markers and PET semiquantitative parameters (SUVmax andTBR) to identify potential associations.

Results: The study enrolled 44 patients, with 39 confirmed cases of MLL, comprising 28 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) and 11 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas (ICC). For MLL detection, [18F]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG exhibited sensitivities of 84.6% (33/39) and 76.9% (30/39), specificitiesy of 60% (3/5) and 100%(5/5), and accuracy of 81.8% (36/44) and 79.5%(35/44). Across all liver lesions, [18F]FAPI-04 significantly surpassed [18F]FDG in SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79) and TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 Vs. 3.17 ± 3.05). Notably, [18F]FAPI-04 displayed markebly elevated SUVmax in benign liver lesions (BLLs) (P = 0.032), HCCs (P = 0.005), and ICCs (P = 0.011). Lesions with hepatocyte negativity (P = 0.023), CD34 negativity(P = 0.044), and high Ki67 expression (> 30%) (P = 0.001) had higher SUVmax on [18F]FAPI-04. Additionally, ARG-1-negative lesions demonstrated higher TBR on [18F]FAPI-04 than ARG-1-positive lesions(P = 0.018). No significant SUVmax/TBR differences were observed with [18F]FDG based on these markers. A linear relationship was identified between Ki67 scores and SUVmax of [18F]FAPI-04 (R = 0.603, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: [18F]FAPI-04 exhibits superior performance over [18F]FDG in PET/CT evaluation of liver cancer, characterized by increased sensitivity and SUVmax/TBR. Significant correlations with molecular markers, including Ki67, suggest [18F]FAPI-04's potential for characterizing liver cancer subtypes and assessing tumor proliferation. However, further research is required to validate these findings and their clinical significance.

Trial registration: NCT05485792, Registered 01 August 2022.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT和[18F]FDG PET/CT对肝癌及其免疫组化标记物进行无创评估的头对头研究。
目的比较[18F]FDG和[18F]FAPI-04在PET/CT评估肝癌病变中的表现,进一步探讨PET半定量数据与肝癌免疫组化标记物之间的关联:方法:疑似肝脏恶性病变(MLL)患者接受[18F]FDG和[18F]FAPI-04 PET/CT扫描。肝脏病变根据其摄取水平超过邻近正常肝组织的摄取水平被目测分为阳性和阴性。记录 SUVmax 和肿瘤与背景比值(TBR),进行半定量分析。以病理结果为金标准,确定了每种示踪剂的敏感性、特异性和准确性。此外,免疫组化分析提供了所有 MLLs 的分子特征。综合分析探讨了这些分子标记物与 PET 半定量参数(SUVmax 和 TBR)之间的相关性,以确定潜在的关联:研究共纳入 44 例患者,其中 39 例确诊为 MLL,包括 28 例肝细胞癌(HCC)和 11 例肝内胆管癌(ICC)。在 MLL 检测中,[18F]FAPI-04 和 [18F]FDG 的敏感性分别为 84.6%(33/39)和 76.9%(30/39),特异性分别为 60%(3/5)和 100%(5/5),准确性分别为 81.8%(36/44)和 79.5%(35/44)。在所有肝脏病变中,[18F]FAPI-04的SUVmax(10.54 ± 6.72 VS. 7.68 ± 6.79)和TBR(4.35 ± 3.78 VS. 3.17 ± 3.05)均明显优于[18F]FDG。值得注意的是,[18F]FAPI-04 在良性肝病变 (BLL)(P = 0.032)、HCC(P = 0.005)和 ICC(P = 0.011)中显示出明显的 SUVmax 升高。肝细胞阴性(P = 0.023)、CD34 阴性(P = 0.044)和高 Ki67 表达(> 30%)(P = 0.001)的病变在 [18F]FAPI-04 上的 SUVmax 较高。此外,ARG-1 阴性病灶在[18F]FAPI-04 上的 TBR 值高于 ARG-1 阳性病灶(P = 0.018)。根据这些标记物,[18F]FDG 的 SUVmax/TBR 无明显差异。Ki67评分与[18F]FAPI-04的SUVmax之间存在线性关系(R = 0.603,P 结论:Ki67评分与[18F]FAPI-04的SUVmax之间存在线性关系:与[18F]FDG相比,[18F]FAPI-04在肝癌的 PET/CT 评估中表现出更优越的性能,其特点是灵敏度和 SUVmax/TBR 均有所提高。[18F]FAPI-04与包括Ki67在内的分子标记物的显著相关性表明,[18F]FAPI-04具有描述肝癌亚型和评估肿瘤增殖的潜力。然而,还需要进一步研究来验证这些发现及其临床意义:试验注册:NCT05485792,注册日期:2022 年 8 月 1 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Combined effects of nutrition, inflammatory status, and sleep quality on mortality in cancer survivors. METTL2B m3C RNA transferase: oncogenic role in ovarian cancer progression via regulation of the mTOR/AKT pathway and its link to the tumor immune microenvironment. 18F-FDG PET/CT-based habitat radiomics combining stacking ensemble learning for predicting prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi-center study. A randomized trial of MONOFIX® vs. V-loc™ for resection bed suture during robotic partial nephrectomy. Periprostatic fat magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics nomogram for predicting biochemical recurrence-free survival in patients with non-metastatic prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1