Use of 3D Exoscope for Free Flaps Microanastomosis in Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Abstract

Background: The use of the 3D exoscope in cervicofacial reconstruction has demonstrated its effectiveness, yet few studies have compared its utility to that of the microscope.

Objective: To compare the reliability of microanastomoses performed with both tools, along with postoperative outcomes and user experience.

Patients and methods: This was a retrospective single-center study that included all cases of microanastomosed forearm or fibula free flap reconstructions performed between June 2019 and June 2022. For each procedure, microsurgical characteristics were collected and compared. The primary outcome measure was the reliability of anastomoses (lack of intraoperative events and absence of early surgical revisions). Secondary outcome measures pertained to postoperative evolution.

Results: Forty patients underwent microanastomosed flap reconstruction (20 forearm flaps, 20 fibula flaps) using either a microscope (n = 10 in each group) or a 3D exoscope (n = 10 in each group). Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. No significant difference was observed between the use of the microscope and the 3D exoscope in terms of anastomosis reliability; OR = 2.07 [0.09-130.88], p = 1. No differences were noted between the two groups in postoperative outcomes except for a shorter hospitalization period for patients undergoing forearm flap reconstruction with the exoscope compared to the microscope (p = 0.03).

Conclusion: The use of the 3D exoscope appears to be an interesting alternative to the microscope in cervicofacial reconstruction due to similar microsurgical results, good ergonomics and significant pedagogical appeal.