Zoom71 navigation: Does tip orientation matter?

Abstract

Background

Aspiration thrombectomy is one of the mainstays for stroke interventions. The Zoom 71 (Z71) aspiration catheter is unique with its angled tip. This study describes the orientation of the angled tip as it is navigated around the carotid siphon in relation to trackability.

Method

Prospectively collected cases involving large vessel occlusions of the anterior circulation intervened upon using the Z71 were retrospectively analyzed. 71 passes in 50 patients were analyzed with respect to Z71 tip orientation. 3 anatomical “turns” were defined as follows: “1”: proximal cavernous, “2”- ophthalmic turn, and “3”-ICA terminus to M1. The tip was described as “Toward” Vs “Away” with respect to the inner curve of each turn. The tip getting “caught” was also analyzed.

Results

There was no preferential angled tip orientation of the Z71 as it was navigated around “Turn 1”, 51 % “Away” vs 44 % “Toward”, p= 0.54; “2”, 46.5 % “Away” vs 53.5 % “Toward”, p= 0.55; and “3”, 43.7 % “Away” vs 46.5 % “Toward”, p=0.63. The tip was not caught in Turn 1. It was caught up in “2” in 15.5 % of passes. “Away” at “2” got caught up in 21 % of passes vs 10.5 % for “Toward”, p= 0.22. Z71 got caught up in “3” in 4.7 % of passes. “Away” was associated with getting caught in 6.5 % of passes vs 3 % for “Toward”, p=0.52. Zoom 88 (Z88) usage as guide catheter may be associated with Z71 getting caught less in “2” compared to “Others”, 9.3 % for Z88 vs 25 %, p= 0.07. This also applied to Turn 3, 0 % for Z88 vs 11.1 %, p=0.038.

Conclusion

There is no preferential angled tip orientation of the Z71 as it navigates around the carotid siphon. The tip orientation does not appear to significantly affect navigation. Usage of Z88 as guide catheter helps with Z71 trackability around the siphon.