Higher Hospitalization Costs and Fewer Routine Discharges in the Medicaid Expansion Era for Lung Transplant Recipients

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Clinical Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1111/ctr.70017
Andrew Kalra, Jessica M. Ruck, Alice L. Zhou, Armaan F. Akbar, Albert Leng, Bin You, Alfred J. Casillan, Jinny S. Ha, Christian A. Merlo, Errol L. Bush
{"title":"Higher Hospitalization Costs and Fewer Routine Discharges in the Medicaid Expansion Era for Lung Transplant Recipients","authors":"Andrew Kalra,&nbsp;Jessica M. Ruck,&nbsp;Alice L. Zhou,&nbsp;Armaan F. Akbar,&nbsp;Albert Leng,&nbsp;Bin You,&nbsp;Alfred J. Casillan,&nbsp;Jinny S. Ha,&nbsp;Christian A. Merlo,&nbsp;Errol L. Bush","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In January 2014, states expanded Medicaid access under the Affordable Care Act. We studied the financial implications of this policy on lung transplantation, a costly procedure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Lung transplant (LT) hospitalizations were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (2005–2020). Recipients were categorized as “pre-expansion” (1/2005–12/2013) versus “post-expansion” (1/2014–12/2020) of Medicaid and as being in “expander” versus “non-expander” regions. We calculated difference-in-differences estimates comparing pre- and post-expansion eras in expander versus non-expander regions for inflation-adjusted hospitalization costs and for discharge disposition. We evaluated total hospitalization costs using multivariable generalized linear regression, adjusting for recipient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, single versus double-lung transplant, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), and mechanical ventilation usage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 29 225 LT recipients identified, 14 085 were pre-expansion and 15 140 were post-expansion. More recipients were insured by Medicaid in expander <i>n</i> = 735 (9%) versus non-expander <i>n</i> = 220, (3%) regions (<i>p</i> = 0.01) post-expansion. Hospitalization costs increased post- versus pre-expansion by $20 948 (95% CI = $8713–$33 183, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) more in expander versus non-expander regions even after adjustment for risk factors associated with increased costs. Within expander regions, recipients post- versus pre-expansion were less likely to be discharged routinely (<i>n</i> = 2625, 28% vs. <i>n</i> = 3959, 44%) and more likely to be discharged to care facilities (<i>n</i> = 2045, 22% vs. <i>n</i> = 1045, 12%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although Medicaid expansion resulted in greater access to care, it was associated with increased hospitalization costs and fewer routine discharges for LT recipients. Further research is warranted to identify the reasons that underpin the financial sequelae of Medicaid expansion, including changes in access to care for sicker patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In January 2014, states expanded Medicaid access under the Affordable Care Act. We studied the financial implications of this policy on lung transplantation, a costly procedure.

Methods

Lung transplant (LT) hospitalizations were identified within the National Inpatient Sample (2005–2020). Recipients were categorized as “pre-expansion” (1/2005–12/2013) versus “post-expansion” (1/2014–12/2020) of Medicaid and as being in “expander” versus “non-expander” regions. We calculated difference-in-differences estimates comparing pre- and post-expansion eras in expander versus non-expander regions for inflation-adjusted hospitalization costs and for discharge disposition. We evaluated total hospitalization costs using multivariable generalized linear regression, adjusting for recipient demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, single versus double-lung transplant, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ex-vivo lung perfusion (EVLP), and mechanical ventilation usage.

Results

Of the 29 225 LT recipients identified, 14 085 were pre-expansion and 15 140 were post-expansion. More recipients were insured by Medicaid in expander n = 735 (9%) versus non-expander n = 220, (3%) regions (p = 0.01) post-expansion. Hospitalization costs increased post- versus pre-expansion by $20 948 (95% CI = $8713–$33 183, p < 0.001) more in expander versus non-expander regions even after adjustment for risk factors associated with increased costs. Within expander regions, recipients post- versus pre-expansion were less likely to be discharged routinely (n = 2625, 28% vs. n = 3959, 44%) and more likely to be discharged to care facilities (n = 2045, 22% vs. n = 1045, 12%, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Although Medicaid expansion resulted in greater access to care, it was associated with increased hospitalization costs and fewer routine discharges for LT recipients. Further research is warranted to identify the reasons that underpin the financial sequelae of Medicaid expansion, including changes in access to care for sicker patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺移植受者在医疗补助扩展时代的住院费用更高,常规出院次数更少。
背景:2014 年 1 月,各州根据《平价医疗法案》扩大了医疗补助的使用范围。我们研究了这一政策对肺移植这一昂贵手术的财务影响:在全国住院病人样本(2005-2020 年)中确定了肺移植(LT)住院病例。受助者被分为医疗补助 "扩张前"(1/2005-12/2013)和 "扩张后"(1/2014-12/2020),以及 "扩张 "地区和 "非扩张 "地区。我们计算了通货膨胀调整后的住院费用和出院处置的差异估计值,比较了扩张前和扩张后地区与非扩张地区的差异估计值。我们使用多变量广义线性回归评估了住院总费用,并对受者人口统计学、查尔森疾病指数、单肺移植与双肺移植、体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)、体外肺灌注(EVLP)和机械通气的使用情况进行了调整:在已确认的 29 225 名长期肺移植受者中,有 14 085 人是肺移植扩展前的受者,15 140 人是肺移植扩展后的受者。在扩大医保范围后,扩大医保范围地区的 735 人(9%)与非扩大医保范围地区的 220 人(3%)相比(P = 0.01),扩大医保范围地区的医疗补助受保人更多。扩展后与扩展前相比,住院费用增加了 20 948 美元(95% CI = 8713-33 183 美元,p 结论:尽管医疗补助扩展使更多的人获得了医疗补助,但医疗补助的使用率却有所下降:虽然医疗补助计划的扩大使人们获得了更多的医疗服务,但却增加了住院费用,减少了长期住院患者的常规出院次数。有必要开展进一步研究,以确定扩大医疗补助计划后产生财务后遗症的原因,包括病情较重的患者在获得医疗服务方面的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
期刊最新文献
Addressing Kidney Transplant Inequalities Facing Rural Americans Senescence Biomarkers and Trajectories of Frailty and Physical Function After Kidney Transplantation The Impact of Statin Intensity on the Early Progression of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Severe Primary Graft Dysfunction Is Associated With Reduced Airway Complications After Lung Transplantation Calcineurin-Inhibitor Discontinuation Could Reduce the Risk of De Novo Malignancies After Liver Transplantation for Alcohol-Related Liver Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1