Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate is Similarly Effective to Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate in Chinese Patients with COPD: The FORSYYN Double-Blind, Randomised Study.
{"title":"Beclometasone Dipropionate/Formoterol Fumarate is Similarly Effective to Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate in Chinese Patients with COPD: The FORSYYN Double-Blind, Randomised Study.","authors":"Fuqiang Wen, Yanmin Wu, Chunyan Xing, Yingqun Zhu, Yongxing Chen, Xiaodong Mei, Massimo Corradi, Glauco Cappellini, Emanuele Calabro, Sergio Amodio, Cissy Zhu, Dmitry Galkin","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) delivered <i>via</i> pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has demonstrated efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in studies predominantly conducted in Caucasian adults. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD, as part of registration for COPD in China. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD of Chinese ethnicity aged ≥40 years. After a 4-week open-label budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/FF) run-in period, patients were randomised to BUD/FF or BDP/FF for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF to BUD/FF in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV<sub>1</sub>) at Week 24 (i.e. the lower 95% CI limit of the difference was above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.07 L). Of 750 patients randomised (377 BDP/FF; 373 BUD/FF), 87.6% completed the study. The primary endpoint was met in both the per-protocol (adjusted mean difference -0.001 L [95% CI: -0.025, 0.022], non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001) and intention-to-treat populations (-0.001 L [-0.024, 0.022]; non-inferiority <i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no statistically significant BDP/FF-BUD/FF differences for the secondary endpoints, and a similar proportion of patients had adverse events (BDP/FF, 51.7%; BUD/FF, 51.2%), with most mild/moderate in severity. In conclusion, BDP/FF pMDI was non-inferior to BUD/FF in terms of pre-dose morning FEV<sub>1</sub>, supported by a range of secondary endpoints. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. The study supports the use of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>China Centre for Drug Evaluation (CTR20180475).</p>","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"21 1","pages":"2425157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2024.2425157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The fixed-dose combination of beclometasone dipropionate/formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) delivered via pressurised metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) has demonstrated efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), in studies predominantly conducted in Caucasian adults. The current study evaluated the efficacy and safety of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD, as part of registration for COPD in China. This double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in patients with COPD of Chinese ethnicity aged ≥40 years. After a 4-week open-label budesonide/formoterol fumarate (BUD/FF) run-in period, patients were randomised to BUD/FF or BDP/FF for 24 weeks. The primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority of BDP/FF to BUD/FF in terms of change from baseline in pre-dose morning forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1) at Week 24 (i.e. the lower 95% CI limit of the difference was above the pre-defined non-inferiority margin of -0.07 L). Of 750 patients randomised (377 BDP/FF; 373 BUD/FF), 87.6% completed the study. The primary endpoint was met in both the per-protocol (adjusted mean difference -0.001 L [95% CI: -0.025, 0.022], non-inferiority p < 0.001) and intention-to-treat populations (-0.001 L [-0.024, 0.022]; non-inferiority p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant BDP/FF-BUD/FF differences for the secondary endpoints, and a similar proportion of patients had adverse events (BDP/FF, 51.7%; BUD/FF, 51.2%), with most mild/moderate in severity. In conclusion, BDP/FF pMDI was non-inferior to BUD/FF in terms of pre-dose morning FEV1, supported by a range of secondary endpoints. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. The study supports the use of BDP/FF pMDI in Chinese patients with COPD.
Study registration: China Centre for Drug Evaluation (CTR20180475).
期刊介绍:
From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.