Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Diagnostics Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14212433
Carolyn Maxwell, Elaine Chapman, Stephen Houghton
{"title":"Validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Screening and Diagnosis in Western Australian Adolescents.","authors":"Carolyn Maxwell, Elaine Chapman, Stephen Houghton","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics14212433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used 25-item screening and diagnostic tool for behavioral and emotional problems in young people. Despite its popularity, evaluations of the SDQ's factor structure in adolescent populations have produced disparate results, and its relationships with theoretically related variables are rarely evaluated. In the present study, these two elements of validity were evaluated based on a large sample of Western Australian adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were 1489 adolescents, <i>n</i> = 623 males with a mean age of 13.79 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.61) and <i>n</i> = 866 females, with a mean age of 14.29 years (<i>SD</i> = 1.51). Participants completed the SDQ alongside measures of loneliness, sense of belonging, depression, bullying, and diagnostic status to evaluate its internal structure and correlations with theoretically related variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Confirmatory factor analyses supported the internal structure of the SDQ both for males and for females. Relationships between the SDQ subscale scores and those from theoretically related variables were also aligned with the instrument's underpinning framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the somewhat disparate results of previous studies, overall, this study supported the validity of the SDQ for use in the Western Australian context.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"14 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11545116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14212433","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used 25-item screening and diagnostic tool for behavioral and emotional problems in young people. Despite its popularity, evaluations of the SDQ's factor structure in adolescent populations have produced disparate results, and its relationships with theoretically related variables are rarely evaluated. In the present study, these two elements of validity were evaluated based on a large sample of Western Australian adolescents.

Methods: Participants were 1489 adolescents, n = 623 males with a mean age of 13.79 years (SD = 1.61) and n = 866 females, with a mean age of 14.29 years (SD = 1.51). Participants completed the SDQ alongside measures of loneliness, sense of belonging, depression, bullying, and diagnostic status to evaluate its internal structure and correlations with theoretically related variables.

Results: Confirmatory factor analyses supported the internal structure of the SDQ both for males and for females. Relationships between the SDQ subscale scores and those from theoretically related variables were also aligned with the instrument's underpinning framework.

Conclusions: Despite the somewhat disparate results of previous studies, overall, this study supported the validity of the SDQ for use in the Western Australian context.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于西澳大利亚青少年筛查和诊断的优势与困难问卷的有效性。
背景/目的:优势与困难问卷(SDQ)是一种广泛使用的筛查和诊断青少年行为和情绪问题的工具,共有 25 个项目。尽管它很受欢迎,但在青少年群体中对 SDQ 的因子结构进行评估的结果却不尽相同,而且很少对它与理论相关变量之间的关系进行评估。在本研究中,我们根据西澳大利亚青少年的大量样本对这两个效度要素进行了评估:参与者为 1489 名青少年,其中男性 623 人,平均年龄 13.79 岁(SD = 1.61),女性 866 人,平均年龄 14.29 岁(SD = 1.51)。受试者在填写 SDQ 的同时,还填写了孤独感、归属感、抑郁、欺凌和诊断状态等测量指标,以评估其内部结构以及与理论相关变量的相关性:对男性和女性进行的确认性因子分析证实了 SDQ 的内部结构。SDQ子量表得分与理论相关变量得分之间的关系也符合该工具的基础框架:尽管之前的研究结果有些差异,但总体而言,本研究支持 SDQ 在西澳大利亚州环境中使用的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Ultrashort Cell-Free DNA Fragments and Vimentin-Positive Circulating Tumor Cells for Predicting Early Recurrence in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer. Monitoring and Management of Cytomegalovirus Reactivations After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children: Experience from a Single Pediatric Center. Molecular Imaging Biomarkers for Early Cancer Detection: A Systematic Review of Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications. AI-Assisted Detection and Localization of Spinal Metastatic Lesions. Evaluating Diagnostic Concordance in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Among Academic Glaucoma Subspecialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1