High VExUS grades are linked to cardiac function in general ICU patients.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.1093/ehjacc/zuae126
Stefan Andrei, Maxime Nguyen, Belaid Bouhemad, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot
{"title":"High VExUS grades are linked to cardiac function in general ICU patients.","authors":"Stefan Andrei, Maxime Nguyen, Belaid Bouhemad, Pierre-Grégoire Guinot","doi":"10.1093/ehjacc/zuae126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Even though initially considered as a new standard in systemic venous congestion assessment, the semi-quantitative Doppler ultrasound-based Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System (VExUS) showed inconsistent associations with outcomes in general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. It is unclear why VExUS is so effective in predicting outcomes in some cohorts and not in others. The determinants of higher VExUS have not been studied in a general ICU cohort. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with higher VExUS (≥ 2) in a general ICU cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational cohort, including adult patients within 24 hours of ICU admission and expected ICU length of stay longer than 2 days. Collected data included patients' hemodynamic status (including ultrasound evaluation) at several points in time: ICU admission, day 1, day 2, day 5, and the last day of ICU stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 514 hemodynamic evaluations in 145 patients. 96/514 (18.7%) had a VExUS grade ≥ 2. The univariable followed by multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses only found a statistically significant association between VExUS ≥ 2 and right ventricle S wave (OR 0.85 (0.74;0.97), p = 0.02) and left ventricle E/A ratio (OR 2.34, 95% CI (1.27;4.33), p = 0.006).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current study has elucidated that higher VExUS is primarily associated with cardiac comorbidities and ultrasound parameters of left- and right-sided cardiac systolic and/or diastolic function in general ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":11861,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal: Acute Cardiovascular Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuae126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Even though initially considered as a new standard in systemic venous congestion assessment, the semi-quantitative Doppler ultrasound-based Venous Excess Ultrasound Grading System (VExUS) showed inconsistent associations with outcomes in general intensive care unit (ICU) patients. It is unclear why VExUS is so effective in predicting outcomes in some cohorts and not in others. The determinants of higher VExUS have not been studied in a general ICU cohort. The aim of this study was to determine the factors associated with higher VExUS (≥ 2) in a general ICU cohort.

Methods: We performed a post-hoc analysis of a prospective, observational cohort, including adult patients within 24 hours of ICU admission and expected ICU length of stay longer than 2 days. Collected data included patients' hemodynamic status (including ultrasound evaluation) at several points in time: ICU admission, day 1, day 2, day 5, and the last day of ICU stay.

Results: We analyzed 514 hemodynamic evaluations in 145 patients. 96/514 (18.7%) had a VExUS grade ≥ 2. The univariable followed by multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analyses only found a statistically significant association between VExUS ≥ 2 and right ventricle S wave (OR 0.85 (0.74;0.97), p = 0.02) and left ventricle E/A ratio (OR 2.34, 95% CI (1.27;4.33), p = 0.006).

Conclusion: The current study has elucidated that higher VExUS is primarily associated with cardiac comorbidities and ultrasound parameters of left- and right-sided cardiac systolic and/or diastolic function in general ICU patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VExUS 分级高与普通重症监护病房患者的心脏功能有关。
背景尽管最初被认为是全身静脉充血评估的新标准,但基于多普勒超声的半定量静脉过度超声分级系统(VExUS)与普通重症监护病房(ICU)患者的预后关系并不一致。目前尚不清楚为什么 VExUS 在某些组群中能有效预测预后,而在其他组群中却不能。在普通重症监护室队列中,尚未研究过 VExUS 较高的决定因素。本研究旨在确定普通 ICU 队列中与较高 VExUS(≥ 2)相关的因素:我们对一个前瞻性观察队列进行了事后分析,该队列包括入住 ICU 24 小时内、预计 ICU 住期超过 2 天的成人患者。收集的数据包括患者在几个时间点的血液动力学状态(包括超声评估):结果:我们对 145 名患者的 514 次血液动力学评估进行了分析。96/514(18.7%)例患者的 VExUS 分级≥2。在单变量和多变量混合效应逻辑回归分析中仅发现 VExUS ≥ 2 与右室 S 波(OR 0.85 (0.74;0.97), p = 0.02)和左室 E/A 比值(OR 2.34, 95% CI (1.27;4.33), p = 0.006)之间存在统计学意义上的显著关联:目前的研究阐明,在普通ICU患者中,较高的VExUS主要与心脏合并症和左右侧心脏收缩和/或舒张功能的超声参数有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.90%
发文量
325
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Acute Cardiovascular Care (EHJ-ACVC) offers a unique integrative approach by combining the expertise of the different sub specialties of cardiology, emergency and intensive care medicine in the management of patients with acute cardiovascular syndromes. Reading through the journal, cardiologists and all other healthcare professionals can access continuous updates that may help them to improve the quality of care and the outcome for patients with acute cardiovascular diseases.
期刊最新文献
Device-Related Adverse Events and Flow Capacity of Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices. The future for cardiogenic shock management - Insights from the leaders of the ESC. Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricular Adaptation and Pulmonary Embolism: A Perfect Couple? High VExUS grades are linked to cardiac function in general ICU patients. The microcirculation in cardiogenic shock.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1