Expert opinion on factors associated with severe laryngeal injury after intubation in the pediatric population: a worldwide survey study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-09060-7
L L Veder, K F M Joosten, L M Staals, B Pullens
{"title":"Expert opinion on factors associated with severe laryngeal injury after intubation in the pediatric population: a worldwide survey study.","authors":"L L Veder, K F M Joosten, L M Staals, B Pullens","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-09060-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To minimize post-intubation laryngeal injury it is important to identify the factors that contribute to the development of these lesions. Previous literature has been inconsistent. This survey aims to investigate experts' opinions on the various factors associated with severe laryngeal injury following intubation in the pediatric population and to determine whether these opinions influence the treatment of patients with one or more of these factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multiple-choice questionnaire with the possibility to provide open text answers was developed and sent by email, WhatsApp and Siilo to members of the scientific societies of anesthesiology, pediatric intensive care, emergency medicine and ear nose throat surgeons worldwide. Responses were analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 363 physicians worldwide responded to the survey, mainly anesthesiologists (31%), intensivists (35%) and ENT surgeons (29%). The majority of the respondents (69%) had over 10 years of experience in pediatric airway management. Overall, factors with the highest agreement (> 80% of respondents) were 'traumatic intubation', 'multiple intubation attempts', 'the use of oversized tubes', 'skill level of the intubator', 'repeated intubations' and 'period of intubation', specifically in small (weight < 2 kg, age < 1 year) children. The factors 'use of muscle relaxants' and 'biological sex' were not considered relevant. In accordance with their daily practice, physicians from different specialties reported varying factors as being relevant. These assumptions influence their routine decisions regarding intubation and extubation procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although not extensively supported by literature, the majority of the experts indicate that factors such as 'traumatic intubation', 'multiple intubation attempts', 'oversized tubes', 'skill level of the intubator', 'repeated intubations' and 'period of intubation' are the most relevant factors in the development of post-intubation severe laryngeal injury in the pediatric population. Physicians from different specialisms also highlight specialism specific factors they consider most significant which influence their day-to-day clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11952,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-09060-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To minimize post-intubation laryngeal injury it is important to identify the factors that contribute to the development of these lesions. Previous literature has been inconsistent. This survey aims to investigate experts' opinions on the various factors associated with severe laryngeal injury following intubation in the pediatric population and to determine whether these opinions influence the treatment of patients with one or more of these factors.

Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire with the possibility to provide open text answers was developed and sent by email, WhatsApp and Siilo to members of the scientific societies of anesthesiology, pediatric intensive care, emergency medicine and ear nose throat surgeons worldwide. Responses were analyzed thematically.

Results: A total of 363 physicians worldwide responded to the survey, mainly anesthesiologists (31%), intensivists (35%) and ENT surgeons (29%). The majority of the respondents (69%) had over 10 years of experience in pediatric airway management. Overall, factors with the highest agreement (> 80% of respondents) were 'traumatic intubation', 'multiple intubation attempts', 'the use of oversized tubes', 'skill level of the intubator', 'repeated intubations' and 'period of intubation', specifically in small (weight < 2 kg, age < 1 year) children. The factors 'use of muscle relaxants' and 'biological sex' were not considered relevant. In accordance with their daily practice, physicians from different specialties reported varying factors as being relevant. These assumptions influence their routine decisions regarding intubation and extubation procedures.

Conclusions: Although not extensively supported by literature, the majority of the experts indicate that factors such as 'traumatic intubation', 'multiple intubation attempts', 'oversized tubes', 'skill level of the intubator', 'repeated intubations' and 'period of intubation' are the most relevant factors in the development of post-intubation severe laryngeal injury in the pediatric population. Physicians from different specialisms also highlight specialism specific factors they consider most significant which influence their day-to-day clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于儿科插管后严重喉损伤相关因素的专家意见:一项全球调查研究。
目的:为了最大限度地减少插管后喉损伤,必须找出导致这些病变的因素。以往的文献并不一致。本调查旨在了解专家们对与儿科插管后严重喉损伤相关的各种因素的看法,并确定这些看法是否会影响对具有一种或多种这些因素的患者的治疗:方法: 编制了一份可提供开放文本答案的多选题问卷,并通过电子邮件、WhatsApp 和 Siilo 发送给全球麻醉学、儿科重症监护、急诊医学和耳鼻喉外科医生科学协会的成员。结果:全球共有 363 名医生回复了调查,主要是麻醉科医生(31%)、重症监护医生(35%)和耳鼻喉外科医生(29%)。大多数受访者(69%)在儿科气道管理方面拥有 10 年以上的经验。总体而言,同意率最高的因素(超过 80% 的受访者)是 "创伤性插管"、"多次插管尝试"、"使用过大的插管"、"插管者的技术水平"、"重复插管 "和 "插管时间",特别是在小儿(体重 结论)中:虽然没有广泛的文献支持,但大多数专家指出,"创伤性插管"、"多次插管尝试"、"过大的插管"、"插管者的技术水平"、"重复插管 "和 "插管时间 "等因素是造成儿科插管后严重喉损伤的最相关因素。来自不同专业的医生还强调了他们认为对日常临床实践影响最大的特定专业因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
537
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of European Union of Medical Specialists – ORL Section and Board Official Journal of Confederation of European Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Head and Neck Surgery "European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology" publishes original clinical reports and clinically relevant experimental studies, as well as short communications presenting new results of special interest. With peer review by a respected international editorial board and prompt English-language publication, the journal provides rapid dissemination of information by authors from around the world. This particular feature makes it the journal of choice for readers who want to be informed about the continuing state of the art concerning basic sciences and the diagnosis and management of diseases of the head and neck on an international level. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology was founded in 1864 as "Archiv für Ohrenheilkunde" by A. von Tröltsch, A. Politzer and H. Schwartze.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Endoscopic ear surgery in the treatment of chronic otitis media with atelectasis. Correction: A novel olfactory sorting task. Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear schwannomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of audiological outcomes. Efficacy and safety of middle turbinate surgery: a systematic review. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss after COVID-19 vaccination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1