Comparative efficacy and safety between intravenous labetalol and intravenous hydralazine for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials
Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves , Lucas Cael Azevedo Ramos Bendaham , Gabriel Henrique Simoni , Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima , Hilária Saugo Faria , Victoria Städler de Abreu , Arlindo Bispo da Silva Júnior , Victor Gonçalves Soares , Bianca Leal Ribeiro , Benjamim Barbosa de Azevedo , Keliany Carla Duarte de Araújo Melo , Cynthia Dantas de Macedo Lins
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety between intravenous labetalol and intravenous hydralazine for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ocílio Ribeiro Gonçalves , Lucas Cael Azevedo Ramos Bendaham , Gabriel Henrique Simoni , Giovana Schlichta Adriano Kojima , Hilária Saugo Faria , Victoria Städler de Abreu , Arlindo Bispo da Silva Júnior , Victor Gonçalves Soares , Bianca Leal Ribeiro , Benjamim Barbosa de Azevedo , Keliany Carla Duarte de Araújo Melo , Cynthia Dantas de Macedo Lins","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy elevate the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes for both mother and fetus. In cases of acute hypertension, several pharmacological interventions are available to lower blood pressure, such as hydralazine, a direct arteriolar vasodilator, and labetalol, a combined alpha and beta-blocker.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous labetalol and intravenous hydralazine for acute hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies comparing labetalol versus hydralazine in pregnant patients. The primary outcomes were median arterial blood pressure (MABP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). We performed statistical analyses using R 4.1.1. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I<sup>2</sup> statistics. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed with a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen RCTs were included in this <em>meta</em>-analysis, comprising 2,261 patients. Among them, 1,131 (50 %) received treatment with labetalol. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of SBP (MD −1.74; 95 % CI −6.72 to 3.23; p = 0.49; I<sup>2</sup> = 93 %), MABP (MD −0.72; 95 % CI −2.34 to 0.90; p = 0.39; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %), DBP (MD 0.25; 95 % CI −4.72 to 5.21; p = 0.92; I<sup>2</sup> = 96 %), tachycardia (RR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.18; p = 0.099; I<sup>2</sup> = 41 %), and placenta abruption (RR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.16; p = 0.093; I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %). However, labetalol significantly reduced maternal hypotension (RR 0.26; 95 % CI 0.21 to 0.33; p < 0.001; I<sup>2</sup> = 41 %) compared with hydralazine.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review and <em>meta</em>-analysis of RCTs found that labetalol and hydralazine were efficient for hypertension disorders in pregnancy. However, labetalol reduced the incidence of maternal hypotension.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"303 ","pages":"Pages 337-344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524006079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Hypertensive disorders during pregnancy elevate the likelihood of unfavorable outcomes for both mother and fetus. In cases of acute hypertension, several pharmacological interventions are available to lower blood pressure, such as hydralazine, a direct arteriolar vasodilator, and labetalol, a combined alpha and beta-blocker.
Objectives
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aims to compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous labetalol and intravenous hydralazine for acute hypertensive disorders during pregnancy.
Methods
We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane for studies comparing labetalol versus hydralazine in pregnant patients. The primary outcomes were median arterial blood pressure (MABP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP). We performed statistical analyses using R 4.1.1. Heterogeneity was examined with the Cochran Q test and I2 statistics. Risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), were computed with a random-effects model.
Results
Nineteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 2,261 patients. Among them, 1,131 (50 %) received treatment with labetalol. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of SBP (MD −1.74; 95 % CI −6.72 to 3.23; p = 0.49; I2 = 93 %), MABP (MD −0.72; 95 % CI −2.34 to 0.90; p = 0.39; I2 = 0 %), DBP (MD 0.25; 95 % CI −4.72 to 5.21; p = 0.92; I2 = 96 %), tachycardia (RR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.18; p = 0.099; I2 = 41 %), and placenta abruption (RR 0.42; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.16; p = 0.093; I2 = 0 %). However, labetalol significantly reduced maternal hypotension (RR 0.26; 95 % CI 0.21 to 0.33; p < 0.001; I2 = 41 %) compared with hydralazine.
Conclusion
This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs found that labetalol and hydralazine were efficient for hypertension disorders in pregnancy. However, labetalol reduced the incidence of maternal hypotension.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.