Physiological and perceptual demands of singles and doubles beach tennis in women of different competition levels.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1434636
Nathalia Jung, Leandro Carpes, Lucas Domingues, Rodrigo Abreu, Magni Mohr, Rodrigo Ferrari
{"title":"Physiological and perceptual demands of singles and doubles beach tennis in women of different competition levels.","authors":"Nathalia Jung, Leandro Carpes, Lucas Domingues, Rodrigo Abreu, Magni Mohr, Rodrigo Ferrari","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1434636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To analyze and compare the physiological responses of women during singles and doubles beach tennis sessions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this crossover trial, twenty-two women with previous participation in amateur beach tennis tournaments randomly performed two experimental sessions: singles and doubles beach tennis. The routine for both sessions consisted of 10-min of seated rest, followed by 45-min of beach tennis and 30-min of post-exercise recovery. Participants were matched against opponents of the same competition level, defined according to their local beach tennis ranking (advanced or intermediate level). They warmed up with basic techniques for 5-min and played 3 matches lasting 12-min, interspersed with 2-min recovery intervals. Heart rate (HR), energy expenditure (EE), number of steps (STEPS), handgrip strength (HS), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and enjoyment were assessed throughout the sessions. Generalized estimating equations were employed to examine the main effects between experimental sessions over the time and in relation to competition level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HRmean and HRmax (Δ: HRmean = 13 ± 3 bpm; HRmax = 11 ± 3 bpm) as well as EE and Steps (Δ: EE = 66 ± 22 kcal; RPE = 2 ± 0 A.U.; Steps = 250 ± 52 A.U.) were higher in singles than doubles (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The percentage of total time spent in the highest HR zone (91-100%HRmax) was significantly greater in singles than in doubles (39% ± 22% vs. 15% ± 18%; <i>p</i> < 0.05). Differences were found in the percentage of total time spent in each HR zone, recovery HR, and HS between competition levels (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Singles beach tennis resulted in higher physiological demands than doubles in women, and players' competition level partly affects the training responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557381/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1434636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze and compare the physiological responses of women during singles and doubles beach tennis sessions.

Methods: In this crossover trial, twenty-two women with previous participation in amateur beach tennis tournaments randomly performed two experimental sessions: singles and doubles beach tennis. The routine for both sessions consisted of 10-min of seated rest, followed by 45-min of beach tennis and 30-min of post-exercise recovery. Participants were matched against opponents of the same competition level, defined according to their local beach tennis ranking (advanced or intermediate level). They warmed up with basic techniques for 5-min and played 3 matches lasting 12-min, interspersed with 2-min recovery intervals. Heart rate (HR), energy expenditure (EE), number of steps (STEPS), handgrip strength (HS), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), and enjoyment were assessed throughout the sessions. Generalized estimating equations were employed to examine the main effects between experimental sessions over the time and in relation to competition level.

Results: HRmean and HRmax (Δ: HRmean = 13 ± 3 bpm; HRmax = 11 ± 3 bpm) as well as EE and Steps (Δ: EE = 66 ± 22 kcal; RPE = 2 ± 0 A.U.; Steps = 250 ± 52 A.U.) were higher in singles than doubles (p < 0.05). The percentage of total time spent in the highest HR zone (91-100%HRmax) was significantly greater in singles than in doubles (39% ± 22% vs. 15% ± 18%; p < 0.05). Differences were found in the percentage of total time spent in each HR zone, recovery HR, and HS between competition levels (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Singles beach tennis resulted in higher physiological demands than doubles in women, and players' competition level partly affects the training responses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同竞技水平的女性对沙滩网球单打和双打的生理和感知要求。
目的:分析和比较女性在沙滩网球单打和双打比赛中的生理反应:在这项交叉试验中,22 名曾参加过业余沙滩网球比赛的女性随机进行了两项实验:沙滩网球单打和双打。两节课的程序都是坐着休息 10 分钟,然后打 45 分钟沙滩网球,运动后恢复 30 分钟。参赛者的对手具有相同的竞技水平,根据他们在当地的沙滩网球排名而定(高级或中级水平)。他们先进行 5 分钟的基本技术热身,然后进行 3 场持续 12 分钟的比赛,中间穿插 2 分钟的恢复间歇。在整个比赛过程中,对心率(HR)、能量消耗(EE)、步数(STEPS)、手握力(HS)、体力消耗量(RPE)和乐趣进行评估。我们采用了广义估计方程来检验各实验环节在时间上的主要影响以及与竞赛水平的关系:结果:单人比赛的平均心率和最大心率(Δ:平均心率 = 13 ± 3 bpm;最大心率 = 11 ± 3 bpm)、EE 和步数(Δ:EE = 66 ± 22 kcal;RPE = 2 ± 0 A.U.;步数 = 250 ± 52 A.U.)均高于双人比赛(P < 0.05)。在最高心率区(91%-100%HRmax)花费的总时间百分比,单人明显高于双人(39% ± 22% vs. 15% ± 18%;p < 0.05)。在各心率区所花费的总时间百分比、恢复心率和 HS 方面,各比赛级别之间也存在差异(P < 0.05):结论:女子沙滩网球单打的生理需求高于双打,运动员的竞技水平在一定程度上影响了训练反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Circulating MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for cerebral collateral circulation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Commentary: Effects of occlusion pressure on hemodynamic responses recorded by near-infrared spectroscopy across two visits. Modern broiler chickens exhibit a differential gastrointestinal immune and metabolic response to repeated CpG injection relative to a 1950s heritage broiler breed. Aging, not Parkinson's disease, decreases a recalibration of body ownership caused by vision-respiratory interaction. Multi-branch fusion graph neural network based on multi-head attention for childhood seizure detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1