A randomized control trial evaluating the advice of a physiological-model/digital twin-based decision support system on mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1473629
Brijesh V Patel, Sharon Mumby, Nicholas Johnson, Rhodri Handslip, Sunil Patel, Teresa Lee, Martin S Andersen, Emanuela Falaschetti, Ian M Adcock, Danny F McAuley, Masao Takata, Thomas Staudinger, Dan S Karbing, Matthieu Jabaudon, Peter Schellongowski, Stephen E Rees
{"title":"A randomized control trial evaluating the advice of a physiological-model/digital twin-based decision support system on mechanical ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.","authors":"Brijesh V Patel, Sharon Mumby, Nicholas Johnson, Rhodri Handslip, Sunil Patel, Teresa Lee, Martin S Andersen, Emanuela Falaschetti, Ian M Adcock, Danny F McAuley, Masao Takata, Thomas Staudinger, Dan S Karbing, Matthieu Jabaudon, Peter Schellongowski, Stephen E Rees","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1473629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is highly heterogeneous, both in its clinical presentation and in the patient's physiological responses to changes in mechanical ventilator settings, such as PEEP. This study investigates the clinical efficacy of a physiological model-based ventilatory decision support system (DSS) to personalize ventilator therapy in ARDS patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This international, multicenter, randomized, open-label study enrolled patients with ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were randomized to either receive active advice from the DSS (intervention) or standard care without DSS advice (control). The primary outcome was to detect a reduction in average driving pressure between groups. Secondary outcomes included several clinically relevant measures of respiratory physiology, ventilator-free days, time from control mode to support mode, number of changes in ventilator settings per day, percentage of time in control and support mode ventilation, ventilation- and device-related adverse events, and the number of times the advice was followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 patients were randomized in this study. The DSS showed no significant effect on average driving pressure between groups. However, patients in the intervention arm had a statistically improved oxygenation index when in support mode ventilation (-1.41, 95% CI: -2.76, -0.08; <i>p</i> = 0.0370). Additionally, the ventilatory ratio significantly improved in the intervention arm for patients in control mode ventilation (-0.63, 95% CI: -1.08, -0.17, <i>p</i> = 0.0068). The application of the DSS led to a significantly increased number of ventilator changes for pressure settings and respiratory frequency.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a physiological model-based decision support system for providing advice on mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS showed no significant difference in driving pressure as a primary outcome measure. However, the application of approximately 60% of the DSS advice led to improvements in the patient's physiological state.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04115709.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"11 ","pages":"1473629"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1473629","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is highly heterogeneous, both in its clinical presentation and in the patient's physiological responses to changes in mechanical ventilator settings, such as PEEP. This study investigates the clinical efficacy of a physiological model-based ventilatory decision support system (DSS) to personalize ventilator therapy in ARDS patients.

Methods: This international, multicenter, randomized, open-label study enrolled patients with ARDS during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients were randomized to either receive active advice from the DSS (intervention) or standard care without DSS advice (control). The primary outcome was to detect a reduction in average driving pressure between groups. Secondary outcomes included several clinically relevant measures of respiratory physiology, ventilator-free days, time from control mode to support mode, number of changes in ventilator settings per day, percentage of time in control and support mode ventilation, ventilation- and device-related adverse events, and the number of times the advice was followed.

Results: A total of 95 patients were randomized in this study. The DSS showed no significant effect on average driving pressure between groups. However, patients in the intervention arm had a statistically improved oxygenation index when in support mode ventilation (-1.41, 95% CI: -2.76, -0.08; p = 0.0370). Additionally, the ventilatory ratio significantly improved in the intervention arm for patients in control mode ventilation (-0.63, 95% CI: -1.08, -0.17, p = 0.0068). The application of the DSS led to a significantly increased number of ventilator changes for pressure settings and respiratory frequency.

Conclusion: The use of a physiological model-based decision support system for providing advice on mechanical ventilation in patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS showed no significant difference in driving pressure as a primary outcome measure. However, the application of approximately 60% of the DSS advice led to improvements in the patient's physiological state.

Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04115709.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项随机对照试验,评估基于生理模型/数字孪生决策支持系统对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气的建议。
背景:急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)在临床表现和患者对机械呼吸机设置(如 PEEP)变化的生理反应方面都存在很大差异。本研究探讨了基于生理模型的通气决策支持系统(DSS)对 ARDS 患者进行个性化通气治疗的临床疗效:这项国际多中心随机开放标签研究招募了 COVID-19 大流行期间的 ARDS 患者。患者被随机分配接受 DSS 的积极建议(干预)或不接受 DSS 建议的标准护理(对照)。主要结果是检测组间平均驱动压力的降低情况。次要结果包括几项与临床相关的呼吸生理指标、无呼吸机天数、从控制模式转为支持模式的时间、每天呼吸机设置的变化次数、控制和支持模式通气时间的百分比、与通气和设备相关的不良事件以及遵循建议的次数:共有 95 名患者被随机纳入这项研究。DSS 对不同组间的平均驱动压力没有明显影响。然而,干预组患者在支持模式通气时的氧合指数有统计学改善(-1.41,95% CI:-2.76,-0.08;P = 0.0370)。此外,干预组患者在控制通气模式下的通气比显著改善(-0.63,95% CI:-1.08,-0.17,p = 0.0068)。应用 DSS 后,呼吸机压力设置和呼吸频率的改变次数明显增加:结论:使用基于生理模型的决策支持系统为 COVID-19 和非 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的机械通气提供建议,在作为主要结果指标的驱动压力方面无明显差异。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov,NCT04115709。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
期刊最新文献
A cluster randomized trial on inspiratory effort-targeted pressure support adjustment strategy in patients undergoing assisted mechanical ventilation: protocol for the IT-PSV study. Analysis of factors influencing bronchiectasis patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and development of a nomogram prediction model. Case report: STRN3-NTRK3 fusion in uterine sarcoma with spleen metastasis: a new variant in the spectrum of NTRK-rearranged tumors. Corrigendum: A comprehensive review of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in chronic lung diseases: recent advances in understanding asthma, COPD, and bronchiectasis. Continuing medical education program completion and influencing factors: a cross-sectional study in Sichuan Province, China.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1