The interplay among sleep patterns, social habits, and environmental cues: insights from the Spanish population and implications for aligning daily rhythms.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2024.1323127
María-Ángeles Bonmatí-Carrión, Jesús Vicente-Martínez, Juan Antonio Madrid, Maria Angeles Rol
{"title":"The interplay among sleep patterns, social habits, and environmental cues: insights from the Spanish population and implications for aligning daily rhythms.","authors":"María-Ángeles Bonmatí-Carrión, Jesús Vicente-Martínez, Juan Antonio Madrid, Maria Angeles Rol","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2024.1323127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The interplay among sleep patterns, social habits and environmental cues is becoming increasingly more important for public health and wellbeing due to its connection to circadian desynchronization. This paper explores said connections in Spain (which has an official and solar time mismatch), introducing the \"Three Times Score\" ‒which is based on questions widely used in the field‒ as a complementary tool for exploring the interplay of daily rhythms.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The questionnaire covers sleep-related habits, social time, and environmental time. The study includes 9,947 participants (34.89 ± 12.15 y/o, mean ± SD; 5,561 women) from different Spanish regions. Sleep parameters were obtained for work and free days, as well as a modified version of the sleep-corrected midsleep on free days (MBFbc) and a parameter similar to social jet lag, both derived from bed time rather than sleep time. A number of indexes were computed to compare bed and work-related habits, together with natural light/dark cycle, along with the Three Times Score. Mixed-effect regression analysis was used to test whether the biological, social and environmental factors included in the study significantly predicted the sleep-related parameters: bedtime, wake-up time, time in bed and mid-bedtime.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>Temporal differences were found between work and free days, with waking-up occurring 2 h earlier on work days (7:10 ± 0:01) than on free days (9:15 ± 0:01). Bed times were 1 h earlier on work days (23:46 ± 0:01) than on free days (00:45 ± 0:01), whereas time in bed was over 1 h shorter on work (7 h 23 min) <i>versus</i> free (8 h 29 min) days. Strong correlations were found between work starting time and waking-up and bedtimes on workdays. Women went to bed earlier and woke up later, spending more time in bed. Differences in sleep habits were observed between work and free days across all age groups. The group of younger adults (18-30) reported going to bed later than older and younger groups, especially on free days. Adolescents and young adults also woke-up later than other age groups, especially on free days. Social jet lag (relative to bed time) and desynchronization indexes also varied with age, with younger adult participants exhibiting higher levels. Seasonal differences were limited, with minor variations between winter and summer. According to the multiple regression analysis, social (day type, work start time, alarm clock usage), biological (age, gender, in most cases related to sex) and environmental (sunset time) factors significantly contribute to predicting sleep/bed related schedules. This study provides insights into sleep habits in the Spanish population, introducing the Three Times Score as a complementary tool for exploring the interactions between sleep/bed-related habits, natural darkness and work-related schedules. Understanding this interplay is crucial for developing tailored interventions to improve sleep and wellbeing.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11543482/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1323127","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The interplay among sleep patterns, social habits and environmental cues is becoming increasingly more important for public health and wellbeing due to its connection to circadian desynchronization. This paper explores said connections in Spain (which has an official and solar time mismatch), introducing the "Three Times Score" ‒which is based on questions widely used in the field‒ as a complementary tool for exploring the interplay of daily rhythms.

Methods: The questionnaire covers sleep-related habits, social time, and environmental time. The study includes 9,947 participants (34.89 ± 12.15 y/o, mean ± SD; 5,561 women) from different Spanish regions. Sleep parameters were obtained for work and free days, as well as a modified version of the sleep-corrected midsleep on free days (MBFbc) and a parameter similar to social jet lag, both derived from bed time rather than sleep time. A number of indexes were computed to compare bed and work-related habits, together with natural light/dark cycle, along with the Three Times Score. Mixed-effect regression analysis was used to test whether the biological, social and environmental factors included in the study significantly predicted the sleep-related parameters: bedtime, wake-up time, time in bed and mid-bedtime.

Results and discussion: Temporal differences were found between work and free days, with waking-up occurring 2 h earlier on work days (7:10 ± 0:01) than on free days (9:15 ± 0:01). Bed times were 1 h earlier on work days (23:46 ± 0:01) than on free days (00:45 ± 0:01), whereas time in bed was over 1 h shorter on work (7 h 23 min) versus free (8 h 29 min) days. Strong correlations were found between work starting time and waking-up and bedtimes on workdays. Women went to bed earlier and woke up later, spending more time in bed. Differences in sleep habits were observed between work and free days across all age groups. The group of younger adults (18-30) reported going to bed later than older and younger groups, especially on free days. Adolescents and young adults also woke-up later than other age groups, especially on free days. Social jet lag (relative to bed time) and desynchronization indexes also varied with age, with younger adult participants exhibiting higher levels. Seasonal differences were limited, with minor variations between winter and summer. According to the multiple regression analysis, social (day type, work start time, alarm clock usage), biological (age, gender, in most cases related to sex) and environmental (sunset time) factors significantly contribute to predicting sleep/bed related schedules. This study provides insights into sleep habits in the Spanish population, introducing the Three Times Score as a complementary tool for exploring the interactions between sleep/bed-related habits, natural darkness and work-related schedules. Understanding this interplay is crucial for developing tailored interventions to improve sleep and wellbeing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
睡眠模式、社会习惯和环境线索之间的相互作用:从西班牙人口中获得的启示以及对调整日常节律的影响。
简介由于睡眠模式、社会习惯和环境线索与昼夜节律不同步的关系,它们之间的相互作用对公众健康和福祉越来越重要。本文探讨了西班牙(官方时间与太阳时不一致)的上述联系,并介绍了 "三时评分"--该评分以该领域广泛使用的问题为基础--作为探索日常节律相互作用的补充工具:方法:调查问卷涵盖与睡眠有关的习惯、社交时间和环境时间。这项研究包括来自西班牙不同地区的 9947 名参与者(34.89 ± 12.15 岁/年,平均 ± SD;5561 名女性)。研究人员获得了工作日和空闲日的睡眠参数,以及空闲日睡眠校正中睡眠时间(MBFbc)的修正版和一个类似于社会时差的参数,这两个参数均来自就寝时间而非睡眠时间。计算了一系列指数,以比较就寝和工作相关的习惯,以及自然光/暗周期和 "三次评分"。研究采用了混合效应回归分析法,以检验研究中的生物、社会和环境因素是否能显著预测与睡眠有关的参数:就寝时间、起床时间、就寝时间和中间就寝时间:工作日和自由活动日之间存在时间差异,工作日的起床时间(7:10 ± 0:01)比自由活动日的起床时间(9:15 ± 0:01)早 2 小时。工作日的就寝时间(23:46 ± 0:01)比自由活动日(00:45 ± 0:01)早 1 小时,而工作日的就寝时间(7 小时 23 分钟)比自由活动日(8 小时 29 分钟)短 1 小时以上。在工作日,工作开始时间与起床和就寝时间之间存在很强的相关性。女性上床时间更早,起床时间更晚,在床上花费的时间更多。在所有年龄组中,工作日和空闲日的睡眠习惯都存在差异。年轻人(18-30 岁)比老年人和年轻人晚睡,尤其是在空闲日。青少年和年轻人也比其他年龄组的人起得晚,尤其是在自由活动日。社会时差(相对于上床睡觉时间)和非同步指数也随年龄而变化,年轻的成人参与者表现出更高的水平。季节性差异有限,冬季和夏季略有不同。根据多元回归分析,社会(日型、工作开始时间、闹钟使用情况)、生理(年龄、性别,大多数情况下与性别有关)和环境(日落时间)因素对预测睡眠/就寝时间有显著作用。这项研究有助于深入了解西班牙人的睡眠习惯,并将 "三时评分 "作为一种补充工具,用于探索睡眠/与床相关的习惯、自然黑夜和与工作相关的时间安排之间的相互作用。了解这种相互作用对于制定有针对性的干预措施以改善睡眠和健康至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Circulating MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers for cerebral collateral circulation in symptomatic carotid stenosis. Commentary: Effects of occlusion pressure on hemodynamic responses recorded by near-infrared spectroscopy across two visits. Modern broiler chickens exhibit a differential gastrointestinal immune and metabolic response to repeated CpG injection relative to a 1950s heritage broiler breed. Aging, not Parkinson's disease, decreases a recalibration of body ownership caused by vision-respiratory interaction. Multi-branch fusion graph neural network based on multi-head attention for childhood seizure detection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1