Evaluation of the efficacy of triazavirin versus oseltamivir in management of COVID-19.

IF 2.4 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Future Science OA Pub Date : 2024-12-31 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1080/20565623.2024.2418798
Sara Samir Mohamed Elmenshawy, Mohamed Farouk Ahmed Abdelsalam, Tarek Refaat El Nagdy, Mohamed Abdel Salam Elgohary, Nagwa Ali Sabri, Amal El-Kholy
{"title":"Evaluation of the efficacy of triazavirin versus oseltamivir in management of COVID-19.","authors":"Sara Samir Mohamed Elmenshawy, Mohamed Farouk Ahmed Abdelsalam, Tarek Refaat El Nagdy, Mohamed Abdel Salam Elgohary, Nagwa Ali Sabri, Amal El-Kholy","doi":"10.1080/20565623.2024.2418798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> To compare the safety and efficacy of triazavirin (TZV) 250 mg capsules versus oseltamivir 75 mg capsules in the treatment of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19.<b>Materials & methods:</b> A double-blind, randomized, interventional pilot study was conducted in a parallel design with a 7-day treatment period.<b>Results:</b> The results showed that TZV is superior to oseltamivir regarding length of hospital stay, days until clinical symptoms improvement, and cure of chest pneumonia.<b>Discussion:</b> Different literature data indicate the superiority of TZV in treating COVID-19 when compared with other therapeutic agents. While there is controversy about the efficacy of oseltamivir.<b>Conclusion:</b> It was concluded that TZV is more effective than oseltamivir in the management of COVID-19 disease.<b>Trial registration number:</b> NCT04973462.</p>","PeriodicalId":12568,"journal":{"name":"Future Science OA","volume":"10 1","pages":"2418798"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Science OA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20565623.2024.2418798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of triazavirin (TZV) 250 mg capsules versus oseltamivir 75 mg capsules in the treatment of individuals diagnosed with COVID-19.Materials & methods: A double-blind, randomized, interventional pilot study was conducted in a parallel design with a 7-day treatment period.Results: The results showed that TZV is superior to oseltamivir regarding length of hospital stay, days until clinical symptoms improvement, and cure of chest pneumonia.Discussion: Different literature data indicate the superiority of TZV in treating COVID-19 when compared with other therapeutic agents. While there is controversy about the efficacy of oseltamivir.Conclusion: It was concluded that TZV is more effective than oseltamivir in the management of COVID-19 disease.Trial registration number: NCT04973462.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估三唑韦林与奥司他韦在治疗 COVID-19 中的疗效。
目的:比较三氮唑韦林(TZV)250 毫克胶囊与奥司他韦 75 毫克胶囊在治疗确诊的 COVID-19 患者中的安全性和有效性:采用平行设计进行了一项双盲、随机、干预性试验研究,治疗期为 7 天:结果表明,在住院时间、临床症状改善天数和胸部肺炎治愈率方面,TZV优于奥司他韦:讨论:不同的文献数据表明,与其他治疗药物相比,TZV 在治疗 COVID-19 方面更具优势。结论:结论:在治疗 COVID-19 疾病方面,TZV 比奥司他韦更有效:试验注册号:NCT04973462。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Future Science OA
Future Science OA MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Science OA is an online, open access, peer-reviewed title from the Future Science Group. The journal covers research and discussion related to advances in biotechnology, medicine and health. The journal embraces the importance of publishing all good-quality research with the potential to further the progress of research in these fields. All original research articles will be considered that are within the journal''s scope, and have been conducted with scientific rigour and research integrity. The journal also features review articles, editorials and perspectives, providing readers with a leading source of commentary and analysis. Submissions of the following article types will be considered: -Research articles -Preliminary communications -Short communications -Methodologies -Trial design articles -Trial results (including early-phase and negative studies) -Reviews -Perspectives -Commentaries
期刊最新文献
Endoscope disinfectant-induced colonic pseudolipomatosis: case series of a rare condition. A comprehensive approach for detection of biotin deficiency from dried blood spot samples using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Ferric carboxymaltose for iron deficiency in patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Formulation and characterization of antibiotic drug loaded aquasome for the topical application. Liver biopsy revealing anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis: a tale for a challenging diagnosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1