Closure of gastric mucosal defects using the reopenable-clip over the line method to decrease the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter propensity score-matched case-control study (with video).

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.015
Shinya Sugimoto, Tatsuma Nomura, Taishi Temma, Emika Sawa, Keita Omae, Nobuyuki Tsuda, Ayako Okuda, Hirofumi Okuda, Mayu Kawabata, Ryutaro Matsushima, Haruka Nakamura, Hirohisa Hisada, Satoshi Hayashi, Toji Murabayashi, Jun Oyamada, Akira Kamei, Hayato Nakagawa
{"title":"Closure of gastric mucosal defects using the reopenable-clip over the line method to decrease the risk of bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection: a multicenter propensity score-matched case-control study (with video).","authors":"Shinya Sugimoto, Tatsuma Nomura, Taishi Temma, Emika Sawa, Keita Omae, Nobuyuki Tsuda, Ayako Okuda, Hirofumi Okuda, Mayu Kawabata, Ryutaro Matsushima, Haruka Nakamura, Hirohisa Hisada, Satoshi Hayashi, Toji Murabayashi, Jun Oyamada, Akira Kamei, Hayato Nakagawa","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-ESD bleeding presents significant risks. Closing mucosal defects following ESD may reduce the incidence of post-ESD bleeding. Currently, no optimal closure method exists. Therefore, we invented clip-line closure using the reopenable-clip over the line method (ROLM) and evaluated its efficacy in preventing post-ESD bleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent gastric ESD between January 2012-March 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: the non-closure group (mucosal defect remained unclosed) and the ROLM group (defect was closed using ROLM). Baseline characteristics of patients, distribution of bleeding risk factors, and incidence and timing of post-ESD bleeding were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following propensity score-matching, 162 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the non-closure group, whereas 160 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the ROLM group. The mean long diameter of the mucosal defects, procedure time for ROLM, and number of clips required for ROLM were 45.9 mm, 35.6 min, and 33.2, respectively. All mucosal defects resulting from the ESD were fully closed using ROLM. The post-ESD bleeding rate in the ROLM group was significantly lower (1.8%, 3/168 lesions) than in the non-closure group (7.7%, 13/168 lesions, p = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ROLM is feasible for mucosal defect closure following gastric ESD and effectively prevents post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients, addressing a significant gap in existing methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.11.015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive treatment for early gastric cancer. However, post-ESD bleeding presents significant risks. Closing mucosal defects following ESD may reduce the incidence of post-ESD bleeding. Currently, no optimal closure method exists. Therefore, we invented clip-line closure using the reopenable-clip over the line method (ROLM) and evaluated its efficacy in preventing post-ESD bleeding.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who underwent gastric ESD between January 2012-March 2024. Patients were categorized into two groups: the non-closure group (mucosal defect remained unclosed) and the ROLM group (defect was closed using ROLM). Baseline characteristics of patients, distribution of bleeding risk factors, and incidence and timing of post-ESD bleeding were compared between the groups. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize potential bias.

Results: Following propensity score-matching, 162 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the non-closure group, whereas 160 ESDs were performed for 168 lesions in the ROLM group. The mean long diameter of the mucosal defects, procedure time for ROLM, and number of clips required for ROLM were 45.9 mm, 35.6 min, and 33.2, respectively. All mucosal defects resulting from the ESD were fully closed using ROLM. The post-ESD bleeding rate in the ROLM group was significantly lower (1.8%, 3/168 lesions) than in the non-closure group (7.7%, 13/168 lesions, p = 0.02).

Conclusions: ROLM is feasible for mucosal defect closure following gastric ESD and effectively prevents post-ESD bleeding in high-risk patients, addressing a significant gap in existing methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可再开夹过线法闭合胃黏膜缺损以降低内镜黏膜下剥离术后出血风险:一项多中心倾向评分匹配病例对照研究(附视频)。
背景和目的:内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种治疗早期胃癌的微创疗法。然而,ESD 术后出血具有很大的风险。在ESD术后封闭粘膜缺损可降低ESD术后出血的发生率。目前,还没有最佳的闭合方法。因此,我们发明了夹线闭合法(ROLM),并评估了其在预防ESD后出血方面的效果:我们回顾性审查了2012年1月至2024年3月期间接受胃ESD的患者数据。患者分为两组:未闭合组(粘膜缺损仍未闭合)和 ROLM 组(使用 ROLM 闭合缺损)。比较了两组患者的基线特征、出血风险因素的分布以及ESD后出血的发生率和时间。为尽量减少潜在偏差,采用了倾向评分匹配法:倾向评分匹配后,非封闭组的168个病灶中进行了162次ESD,而ROLM组的168个病灶中进行了160次ESD。粘膜缺损的平均长径、ROLM手术时间和ROLM所需的夹子数量分别为45.9毫米、35.6分钟和33.2个。所有ESD导致的粘膜缺损均通过ROLM完全闭合。ROLM组ESD后出血率(1.8%,3/168个病灶)明显低于未闭合组(7.7%,13/168个病灶,P = 0.02):ROLM可用于胃ESD术后粘膜缺损的闭合,并能有效预防高危患者ESD术后出血,弥补了现有方法的重大缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Management of Patients with Colorectal Intramucosal Carcinoma Compared to High-Grade Dysplasia and T1 Colorectal Cancer. Development and validation of the Open-Source Automatic Bowel Preparation Scale. Digital single-operator cholangioscopy for difficult anastomotic biliary strictures in living donor liver transplantation recipients after failure of standard ERCP: SPYPASS-2 study. Identification of risk factors associated with post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with easy cannulation: A prospective multicenter observational study. Interobserver Agreement in Dysplasia Grading of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms: Performance of Kyoto Guidelines and Optimization of Endomicroscopy Biomarkers through Pathology Reclassification.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1