Summary of best evidence on prevention of intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasm resection.

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-31 Epub Date: 2024-10-26 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-415
Jing Wang, Ping Yu, Qi Chen, Zhijun Han, Qing Wang, Xiaojie Lu, Xuechao Wu, Chun Bian, Mingzhu Gao
{"title":"Summary of best evidence on prevention of intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasm resection.","authors":"Jing Wang, Ping Yu, Qi Chen, Zhijun Han, Qing Wang, Xiaojie Lu, Xuechao Wu, Chun Bian, Mingzhu Gao","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracranial infection is one of the most serious complications after pituitary neoplasm resection. However, the quality of the evidence for existing preventive measures varies significantly, and the related content is scattered, and the scope is broad. Nurses lack the specificity and targeted guidance for preventing intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS), and nurses find that evidence necessitates screening and identification during its application, and it is challenging to utilize current tool for guiding clinical practice. Thus, the protocols for preventing intracranial infection after EETS required further refinement. The aim of this study is to summarize the relevant evidence for preventing postoperative intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasm resection, in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection and provide a reference for clinical medical staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched a variety of platforms, including British Medical Journal Best Practice, UpToDate, DynaMed, Guidelines International Network, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence based Healthcare Center Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Medlive, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedical literature service system (Sinomed) to collect clinical decisions, relevant guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and expert consensus documents on the prevention of intracranial infection in this context according to the 6S evidence model. The search included literature published up to December, 2023. Then conduct literature screening and evaluation, extract and summarize relevant evidence on perioperative prevention of intracranial infection after EETS from the selected literature. Two researchers applied the JBI levels of evidence preappraisal system (2014 version) to categorize the included evidence into five levels (level 1a being the highest and level 5c being the lowest).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16 pieces of literature were reviewed, including 6 clinical decision-makings, 2 guidelines, 2 systematic reviews, and 6 expert consensus documents. Ultimately, 24 pieces of best evidence for preventing intracranial infections after EETS for pituitary adenomas were formed, and they will be divided into four categories: multidisciplinary collaboration, preoperative evaluation and informed consent, intraoperative prevention and control, and postoperative observation and prevention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This summarized the best evidence for preventing intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasms resection. Summary of the best evidence for preventing intracranial infections following EETS plays a critical role in enhancing surgical success, optimizing patient management, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration, advancing research, and improving patient satisfaction. It is recommended that medical staff select and apply the evidence in clinical practice in order to avoid the occurrence of intracranial infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 10","pages":"1759-1769"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11558293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-415","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intracranial infection is one of the most serious complications after pituitary neoplasm resection. However, the quality of the evidence for existing preventive measures varies significantly, and the related content is scattered, and the scope is broad. Nurses lack the specificity and targeted guidance for preventing intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery (EETS), and nurses find that evidence necessitates screening and identification during its application, and it is challenging to utilize current tool for guiding clinical practice. Thus, the protocols for preventing intracranial infection after EETS required further refinement. The aim of this study is to summarize the relevant evidence for preventing postoperative intracranial infections after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasm resection, in order to reduce the incidence of postoperative intracranial infection and provide a reference for clinical medical staff.

Methods: We systematically searched a variety of platforms, including British Medical Journal Best Practice, UpToDate, DynaMed, Guidelines International Network, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Australian Joanna Briggs Institute Evidence based Healthcare Center Database, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Medlive, Wanfang Data, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Chinese biomedical literature service system (Sinomed) to collect clinical decisions, relevant guidelines, evidence summaries, systematic reviews, and expert consensus documents on the prevention of intracranial infection in this context according to the 6S evidence model. The search included literature published up to December, 2023. Then conduct literature screening and evaluation, extract and summarize relevant evidence on perioperative prevention of intracranial infection after EETS from the selected literature. Two researchers applied the JBI levels of evidence preappraisal system (2014 version) to categorize the included evidence into five levels (level 1a being the highest and level 5c being the lowest).

Results: A total of 16 pieces of literature were reviewed, including 6 clinical decision-makings, 2 guidelines, 2 systematic reviews, and 6 expert consensus documents. Ultimately, 24 pieces of best evidence for preventing intracranial infections after EETS for pituitary adenomas were formed, and they will be divided into four categories: multidisciplinary collaboration, preoperative evaluation and informed consent, intraoperative prevention and control, and postoperative observation and prevention.

Conclusions: This summarized the best evidence for preventing intracranial infection after endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary neoplasms resection. Summary of the best evidence for preventing intracranial infections following EETS plays a critical role in enhancing surgical success, optimizing patient management, fostering multidisciplinary collaboration, advancing research, and improving patient satisfaction. It is recommended that medical staff select and apply the evidence in clinical practice in order to avoid the occurrence of intracranial infections.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内窥镜经鼻垂体肿瘤切除术后预防颅内感染的最佳证据摘要。
背景:颅内感染是垂体肿瘤切除术后最严重的并发症之一:颅内感染是垂体肿瘤切除术后最严重的并发症之一。然而,现有预防措施的证据质量参差不齐,相关内容分散,涉及范围较广。护士在预防内镜下经鼻蝶手术(EETS)后颅内感染方面缺乏特异性和针对性的指导,护士在应用过程中发现证据需要筛选和鉴别,利用现有工具指导临床实践具有挑战性。因此,EETS术后预防颅内感染的方案需要进一步完善。本研究旨在总结内镜下经鼻蝶垂体肿瘤切除术后预防颅内感染的相关证据,以降低术后颅内感染的发生率,为临床医务人员提供参考:我们系统检索了多个平台,包括英国医学杂志最佳实践、UpToDate、DynaMed、国际指南网络、安大略省注册护士协会、苏格兰校际指南网络、澳大利亚乔安娜-布里格斯研究所循证医疗中心数据库、美国国家健康与临床优化研究所、Medlive、万方数据等、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science和中国生物医学文献服务系统(Sinomed),根据6S证据模型收集在此背景下预防颅内感染的临床决策、相关指南、证据摘要、系统综述和专家共识文件。检索包括截至2023年12月发表的文献。然后进行文献筛选和评估,从入选文献中提取并总结EETS后围手术期预防颅内感染的相关证据。两位研究人员采用JBI证据等级预评估系统(2014年版)将纳入的证据分为五个等级(1a级最高,5c级最低):结果:共审查了 16 篇文献,包括 6 篇临床决策、2 篇指南、2 篇系统综述和 6 篇专家共识文件。最终形成了 24 项预防垂体腺瘤 EETS 术后颅内感染的最佳证据,并将其分为多学科协作、术前评估与知情同意、术中预防与控制、术后观察与预防四类:总结了内镜下经鼻蝶垂体瘤切除术后预防颅内感染的最佳证据。总结预防 EETS 术后颅内感染的最佳证据在提高手术成功率、优化患者管理、促进多学科合作、推动研究和提高患者满意度方面起着至关重要的作用。建议医务人员在临床实践中选择并应用相关证据,以避免颅内感染的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative approach and technical considerations in parotid surgery. Preparation and characterization of a rat uterine decellularized scaffold. Propensity analysis reveals survival disparities between T1a and T1b well-differentiated thyroid cancer based on surgery. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for in breast tumor recurrence after initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ. Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1