Zhisheng Chen MMed , Jianmin Chu MMed , Jing Wang MD, PhD , Chi Cai MD, PhD , Xilie Lu BSc , Manshu Song PhD , Lois Balmer PhD , Wei Wang MD, PhD , Xuerui Tan MD, PhD
{"title":"Horizontal QRS axis predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block","authors":"Zhisheng Chen MMed , Jianmin Chu MMed , Jing Wang MD, PhD , Chi Cai MD, PhD , Xilie Lu BSc , Manshu Song PhD , Lois Balmer PhD , Wei Wang MD, PhD , Xuerui Tan MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V<sub>2</sub> and V<sub>6</sub>. CRT response was defined as a ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and at least 1 New York Heart Association class reduction 1 year after CRT implantation. The composite end point included HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 244 consecutive CRT recipients, 156 (63.9%) responded favorably; 88 (36.1%) were nonresponders. The horizontal QRS axis demonstrated significant backward deviation (−75.5° [−79.7° to −69.0°] vs −65.0° [−73.0° to −46.5°]; <em>P</em> < .001) and larger magnitude (35.5 ± 10.9 mm vs 25.5 ± 10.5 mm; <em>P</em> < .001) in CRT responders compared with nonresponders. The direction and magnitude independently predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.778 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717–0.839) and 0.749 (95% CI, 0.685–0.814), respectively. Combining both parameters increased the area under the curve to 0.814 (95% CI, 0.760–0.868). Moreover, the direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis, or their combination, predicted the composite end point of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.22–0.60), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25–0.67), and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15–0.41), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Horizontal QRS axis accurately predicts CRT response and prognosis in HF patients with LBBB.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12886,"journal":{"name":"Heart rhythm","volume":"22 7","pages":"Pages e122-e131"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart rhythm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154752712403563X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Electrocardiogram criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB) inadequately predict left ventricular electrical dyssynchrony, complicating cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidate selection.
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the horizontal QRS axis for CRT response in heart failure (HF) patients with LBBB patterns.
Methods
The direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis were calculated using the net amplitudes in leads V2 and V6. CRT response was defined as a ≥10% increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and at least 1 New York Heart Association class reduction 1 year after CRT implantation. The composite end point included HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality.
Results
Of 244 consecutive CRT recipients, 156 (63.9%) responded favorably; 88 (36.1%) were nonresponders. The horizontal QRS axis demonstrated significant backward deviation (−75.5° [−79.7° to −69.0°] vs −65.0° [−73.0° to −46.5°]; P < .001) and larger magnitude (35.5 ± 10.9 mm vs 25.5 ± 10.5 mm; P < .001) in CRT responders compared with nonresponders. The direction and magnitude independently predicted CRT response with an area under the curve of 0.778 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.717–0.839) and 0.749 (95% CI, 0.685–0.814), respectively. Combining both parameters increased the area under the curve to 0.814 (95% CI, 0.760–0.868). Moreover, the direction and magnitude of the horizontal QRS axis, or their combination, predicted the composite end point of HF hospitalization or all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios of 0.36 (95% CI, 0.22–0.60), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25–0.67), and 0.25 (95% CI, 0.15–0.41), respectively.
Conclusion
Horizontal QRS axis accurately predicts CRT response and prognosis in HF patients with LBBB.
期刊介绍:
HeartRhythm, the official Journal of the Heart Rhythm Society and the Cardiac Electrophysiology Society, is a unique journal for fundamental discovery and clinical applicability.
HeartRhythm integrates the entire cardiac electrophysiology (EP) community from basic and clinical academic researchers, private practitioners, engineers, allied professionals, industry, and trainees, all of whom are vital and interdependent members of our EP community.
The Heart Rhythm Society is the international leader in science, education, and advocacy for cardiac arrhythmia professionals and patients, and the primary information resource on heart rhythm disorders. Its mission is to improve the care of patients by promoting research, education, and optimal health care policies and standards.