Atypical Multi-ligamentous Knee Injury (MLKI): Binary Injury with Avulsion of One Cruciate and Tear of the Other, or Bi-cruciates Avulsion with or Without Collateral Ligament Injury Following Road Traffic Accidents (RTA).

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-09-21 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01256-7
Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth, Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan, Suchit Chavan, Kenchi Charith Nagarjun, Terence D'souza, Arumugam Palanisamy, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"Atypical Multi-ligamentous Knee Injury (MLKI): Binary Injury with Avulsion of One Cruciate and Tear of the Other, or Bi-cruciates Avulsion with or Without Collateral Ligament Injury Following Road Traffic Accidents (RTA).","authors":"Rajagopalakrishnan Ramakanth, Silvampatti Ramasamy Sundararajan, Suchit Chavan, Kenchi Charith Nagarjun, Terence D'souza, Arumugam Palanisamy, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01256-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multi-ligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) fall within a narrow spectrum, accounting for around 11% of all knee injuries. Atypical MLKI involve binary injury: avulsion of one cruciate and tear of the other, or both cruciates avulsion with or without collateral ligament injury.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients diagnosed with atypical MLKI, and to assess the differences in outcomes between patients with collateral injury and those without.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>66 patients with atypical MLKI were studied and compared in this retrospective cohort. 32 of these patients did not have collateral injuries, while the remaining 34 patients did have collateral injuries. The duration of the study was from 2010 to 2022. Reconstruction for the cruciate tears and open or arthroscopic reduction and fixation (ORIF/ARIF) of the cruciate avulsion were performed. In earlier years (2010-2015), posterior cruciate ligament avulsions were open reduced and fixed using the double draping approach. However, in later years (2016-2022), the double draping method was replaced by the single draping technique. Conservative or surgical management of the collateral ligaments was determined based on factors such as intraoperative laxity, tissue quality, injury site, and chronicity. Group 1 comprised of atypical MLKI patients without collateral ligament injuries, while Group 2 included atypical MLKI patients with collateral ligament injuries and subgroup was based on the various combinations of cruciate avulsions, tears and collateral injuries. A comparative statistical analysis was conducted on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), and laxity on stress radiographs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The male:female ratio were 54:12 patients. The average follow-up was 26.48 months (range 23-30 months). The average age of the patients is 37.66 (range 20-50 years). All patients had significant improvement from pre-operative scores to final follow-up scores (<i>P</i> < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the atypical MLKI with collateral and atypical MLKI without collateral injury in terms of the postoperative IKDC score (<i>P</i> = 0.154), Lysholm score (<i>P</i> = 0.387), knee flexion ROM (<i>P</i> = 0.314), and laxity on radiographs with anterior stress (<i>P</i> = 0.108) and posterior stress (<i>P</i> = 0.272). The intergroup analysis was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in patients' functional outcomes at final follow-up based on fixation modality. Patients recovered to their pre-injury activity levels without knee joint giving way on daily activities. None of the patients in our series had infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of atypical MLKI in multi-ligamentous injury was 9.53% (66/692). Atypical MLKI with cruciate avulsion can be treated with ARIF and cruciate tears with reconstruction in single-stage single draping method with good clinical and radiographic results. Atypical MLKI with or without collateral ligament injury had similar outcomes when appropriate techniques are instituted to address collateral ligaments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554968/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01256-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multi-ligamentous knee injuries (MLKI) fall within a narrow spectrum, accounting for around 11% of all knee injuries. Atypical MLKI involve binary injury: avulsion of one cruciate and tear of the other, or both cruciates avulsion with or without collateral ligament injury.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to analyse the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients diagnosed with atypical MLKI, and to assess the differences in outcomes between patients with collateral injury and those without.

Methods: 66 patients with atypical MLKI were studied and compared in this retrospective cohort. 32 of these patients did not have collateral injuries, while the remaining 34 patients did have collateral injuries. The duration of the study was from 2010 to 2022. Reconstruction for the cruciate tears and open or arthroscopic reduction and fixation (ORIF/ARIF) of the cruciate avulsion were performed. In earlier years (2010-2015), posterior cruciate ligament avulsions were open reduced and fixed using the double draping approach. However, in later years (2016-2022), the double draping method was replaced by the single draping technique. Conservative or surgical management of the collateral ligaments was determined based on factors such as intraoperative laxity, tissue quality, injury site, and chronicity. Group 1 comprised of atypical MLKI patients without collateral ligament injuries, while Group 2 included atypical MLKI patients with collateral ligament injuries and subgroup was based on the various combinations of cruciate avulsions, tears and collateral injuries. A comparative statistical analysis was conducted on the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, knee flexion range of motion (ROM), and laxity on stress radiographs.

Results: The male:female ratio were 54:12 patients. The average follow-up was 26.48 months (range 23-30 months). The average age of the patients is 37.66 (range 20-50 years). All patients had significant improvement from pre-operative scores to final follow-up scores (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the atypical MLKI with collateral and atypical MLKI without collateral injury in terms of the postoperative IKDC score (P = 0.154), Lysholm score (P = 0.387), knee flexion ROM (P = 0.314), and laxity on radiographs with anterior stress (P = 0.108) and posterior stress (P = 0.272). The intergroup analysis was not statistically significant. There was no significant difference in patients' functional outcomes at final follow-up based on fixation modality. Patients recovered to their pre-injury activity levels without knee joint giving way on daily activities. None of the patients in our series had infections.

Conclusion: The incidence of atypical MLKI in multi-ligamentous injury was 9.53% (66/692). Atypical MLKI with cruciate avulsion can be treated with ARIF and cruciate tears with reconstruction in single-stage single draping method with good clinical and radiographic results. Atypical MLKI with or without collateral ligament injury had similar outcomes when appropriate techniques are instituted to address collateral ligaments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非典型多韧带膝关节损伤(MLKI):道路交通事故(RTA)后的二元损伤:一侧十字韧带撕脱和另一侧十字韧带撕脱,或双十字韧带撕脱伴或不伴侧韧带损伤。
背景:膝关节多韧带损伤(MLKI)的范围较窄,约占膝关节损伤总数的 11%。非典型多韧带膝关节损伤涉及二元损伤:一侧十字韧带撕脱和另一侧十字韧带撕脱,或双侧十字韧带撕脱伴或不伴有副韧带损伤。目的:本研究旨在分析被诊断为非典型多韧带膝关节损伤患者的临床和放射学结果,并评估伴有副韧带损伤和不伴有副韧带损伤的患者在结果上的差异。方法:在这一回顾性队列中研究并比较了 66 例非典型多韧带膝关节损伤患者。其中 32 例患者没有侧支损伤,其余 34 例患者有侧支损伤。研究时间为 2010 年至 2022 年。研究人员对十字韧带撕裂进行了重建,并对十字韧带撕脱进行了开放或关节镜复位固定术(ORIF/ARIF)。在早些年(2010-2015 年),后交叉韧带撕脱采用双层悬吊法进行开放性缩窄和固定。然而,在后来的几年(2016-2022 年)中,双垂线法被单垂线技术所取代。根据术中松弛程度、组织质量、损伤部位和慢性程度等因素决定对副韧带进行保守治疗还是手术治疗。第一组包括无侧韧带损伤的非典型 MLKI 患者,第二组包括有侧韧带损伤的非典型 MLKI 患者,根据十字韧带撕脱、撕裂和侧韧带损伤的不同组合进行分组。对国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、Lysholm评分、膝关节屈曲活动范围(ROM)和压力X光片上的松弛度进行了比较统计分析:男女患者比例为 54:12。平均随访时间为 26.48 个月(23-30 个月)。患者平均年龄为 37.66 岁(20-50 岁不等)。所有患者的术前评分与最终随访评分(P P = 0.154)、Lysholm 评分(P = 0.387)、膝关节屈曲 ROM(P = 0.314)、前部受力(P = 0.108)和后部受力(P = 0.272)的影像学松弛度均有明显改善。组间分析无统计学意义。根据固定方式的不同,患者在最终随访时的功能结果没有明显差异。患者恢复到了受伤前的活动水平,膝关节在日常活动中没有受限。我们的系列研究中没有一名患者发生感染:结论:多韧带损伤的非典型 MLKI 发生率为 9.53%(66/692)。非典型 MLKI 伴有十字韧带撕脱,可采用 ARIF 和十字韧带撕裂重建术进行治疗,单阶段单铺巾法临床和影像学效果良好。如果采用适当的技术处理副韧带,有或没有副韧带损伤的非典型 MLKI 的疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Technology Update in Management of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries. From the Guest Editors: Unraveling the Complexities of Multiligament Knee Injuries-A Global Endeavor. Strategies for Preventing Tunnel Convergence in Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstructions. Adjustable Loop Fixation in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: A Technical Note. Clinical Results of Isolated MCL Grade III Injury in Acute and Chronic Setting: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1