Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Affects the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY International Urogynecology Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05989-9
Ella Eg Fabricius, Thomas Bergholt, Louise Kelstrup, Hanna Jangö
{"title":"Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Affects the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies.","authors":"Ella Eg Fabricius, Thomas Bergholt, Louise Kelstrup, Hanna Jangö","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-05989-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>High birth weight increases the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Macrosomia is a well-known complication in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether gestational diabetes is a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. We hypothesized that women with gestational diabetes have an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PubMed and Embase databases. Studies including numbers on women with and without gestational diabetes and with and without obstetric anal sphincter injury were included. Studies were assessed using the SIGN-methodology checklist to evaluate the quality and risk of bias. Extracted data was analyzed using RevMan 5.4 and the statistical software R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve cohort studies were included for the meta-analyses. Overall, we found a slightly increased prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury among the women with gestational diabetes of 2.40% (95% CI; 2.37-2.43) compared to 2.31% (95% CI; 2.30-2.32) in women without diabetes. The meta-analysis revealed increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in the gestational diabetes-group (RR 1.24 [95% CI; 1.12-1.37]) with a high level of heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 94%). Primiparous women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury 6.65% (95% CI; 6.18-7.14) compared to 4.98% (95% CI; 4.89-5.08) in the control group, whereas the risk was not significantly increased in multiparous women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury is increased in primiparous women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared to women without gestational diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05989-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: High birth weight increases the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury. Macrosomia is a well-known complication in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to investigate whether gestational diabetes is a risk factor for obstetric anal sphincter injury. We hypothesized that women with gestational diabetes have an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using the PubMed and Embase databases. Studies including numbers on women with and without gestational diabetes and with and without obstetric anal sphincter injury were included. Studies were assessed using the SIGN-methodology checklist to evaluate the quality and risk of bias. Extracted data was analyzed using RevMan 5.4 and the statistical software R.

Results: Twelve cohort studies were included for the meta-analyses. Overall, we found a slightly increased prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injury among the women with gestational diabetes of 2.40% (95% CI; 2.37-2.43) compared to 2.31% (95% CI; 2.30-2.32) in women without diabetes. The meta-analysis revealed increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in the gestational diabetes-group (RR 1.24 [95% CI; 1.12-1.37]) with a high level of heterogeneity (I2 = 94%). Primiparous women with gestational diabetes had an increased risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury 6.65% (95% CI; 6.18-7.14) compared to 4.98% (95% CI; 4.89-5.08) in the control group, whereas the risk was not significantly increased in multiparous women.

Conclusions: The risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury is increased in primiparous women with gestational diabetes mellitus compared to women without gestational diabetes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
妊娠糖尿病影响产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险:队列研究的系统回顾和元分析》。
导言和假设:高出生体重会增加产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险。众所周知,巨大儿是妊娠期糖尿病并发妊娠的一种并发症。本研究旨在探讨妊娠糖尿病是否是产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险因素。我们假设,患有妊娠糖尿病的妇女发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险会增加:我们使用 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库进行了系统性回顾和荟萃分析。方法:我们使用 PubMed 和 Embed 数据库进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,纳入了关于患有和未患有妊娠糖尿病以及患有和未患有产科肛门括约肌损伤的妇女的研究。研究采用 SIGN 方法学核对表进行评估,以评价其质量和偏倚风险。提取的数据使用 RevMan 5.4 和 R 统计软件进行分析:荟萃分析纳入了 12 项队列研究。总体而言,我们发现患有妊娠糖尿病的妇女产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率略有增加,为 2.40% (95% CI; 2.37-2.43),而未患糖尿病的妇女为 2.31% (95% CI; 2.30-2.32)。荟萃分析显示,妊娠糖尿病组产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险增加(RR 1.24 [95% CI; 1.12-1.37]),异质性较高(I2 = 94%)。患有妊娠糖尿病的初产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险为6.65% (95% CI; 6.18-7.14),而对照组为4.98% (95% CI; 4.89-5.08),多产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险没有显著增加:结论:与没有妊娠糖尿病的妇女相比,患有妊娠糖尿病的初产妇发生产科肛门括约肌损伤的风险更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
期刊最新文献
Effects of Urinary Incontinence Subtypes on Quality of Life and Sexual Function among Women Seeking Weight Loss. The Association between Depression and Overactive Bladder: A Cross-Sectional Study of NHANES 2011-2018. Erroneous and Incomplete Reporting of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System. Health Inequalities in Urogynaecology. A Comparison of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises and Spinal Stabilization Exercises in Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1