Perspectives regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated persons with mental illness.

Industrial Psychiatry Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI:10.4103/ipj.ipj_7_24
Asha Charitha Saroja Shankarappa, Rajesh Gopalakrishanan, Thangadurai Packirisamy, Anju Kuruvilla
{"title":"Perspectives regarding COVID-19 vaccination among unvaccinated persons with mental illness.","authors":"Asha Charitha Saroja Shankarappa, Rajesh Gopalakrishanan, Thangadurai Packirisamy, Anju Kuruvilla","doi":"10.4103/ipj.ipj_7_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The risk of COVID-19 infection and related health consequences is higher among persons with mental illnesses (PMI). Vaccines have had an impact in reducing the morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Understanding the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in PMI is crucial for promoting vaccine acceptance in this population, but it remains an under-researched topic.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed perspectives among unvaccinated PMI regarding COVID-19 vaccination in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in this population were explored.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred consecutive PMI attending the psychiatric outpatient clinic who had not taken the COVID-19 vaccination were recruited after obtaining informed consent. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to elicit knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19 vaccination. The Oxford vaccine hesitancy scale was used to assess vaccine hesitancy; the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 were administered to assess current psychopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A majority of the participants (62%) were unwilling for the vaccination, the most common reasons being the perception that they were not at risk of infection, and worry about the possible side effects of the vaccination. Factors associated with low vaccine hesitancy were higher levels of education, greater perception of the risk of contracting the disease, belief that vaccination was effective, and easy accessibility to the vaccine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improving awareness, providing accurate information, and ensuring better accessibility to vaccines are necessary to improve vaccine coverage among PMI. Mental health professionals need to assume an active role in providing education and clarifying misconceptions among our vulnerable patient population to help mitigate vaccine hesitancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13534,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11553621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Psychiatry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ipj.ipj_7_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The risk of COVID-19 infection and related health consequences is higher among persons with mental illnesses (PMI). Vaccines have had an impact in reducing the morbidity and mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection. Understanding the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in PMI is crucial for promoting vaccine acceptance in this population, but it remains an under-researched topic.

Aims: This cross-sectional study assessed perspectives among unvaccinated PMI regarding COVID-19 vaccination in a tertiary care teaching hospital. Factors associated with vaccine hesitancy in this population were explored.

Materials and methods: One-hundred consecutive PMI attending the psychiatric outpatient clinic who had not taken the COVID-19 vaccination were recruited after obtaining informed consent. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to elicit knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19 vaccination. The Oxford vaccine hesitancy scale was used to assess vaccine hesitancy; the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 were administered to assess current psychopathology.

Results: A majority of the participants (62%) were unwilling for the vaccination, the most common reasons being the perception that they were not at risk of infection, and worry about the possible side effects of the vaccination. Factors associated with low vaccine hesitancy were higher levels of education, greater perception of the risk of contracting the disease, belief that vaccination was effective, and easy accessibility to the vaccine.

Conclusion: Improving awareness, providing accurate information, and ensuring better accessibility to vaccines are necessary to improve vaccine coverage among PMI. Mental health professionals need to assume an active role in providing education and clarifying misconceptions among our vulnerable patient population to help mitigate vaccine hesitancy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
未接种疫苗的精神病患者对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的看法。
背景:精神病患者(PMI)感染 COVID-19 的风险更高,相关的健康后果也更严重。疫苗在降低 COVID-19 感染者的发病率和死亡率方面发挥了作用。目的:这项横断面研究评估了一家三级医疗教学医院中未接种疫苗的精神病患者对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的看法。材料与方法:在获得知情同意后,招募了 100 名连续到精神科门诊就诊且未接种 COVID-19 疫苗的 PMI。采用半结构式问卷调查的方式了解患者对接种 COVID-19 疫苗的认识、态度和做法。牛津疫苗犹豫不决量表用于评估疫苗犹豫不决;简易精神病评定量表和抑郁焦虑压力量表-21用于评估当前的精神病理学:结果:大多数参与者(62%)不愿意接种疫苗,最常见的原因是认为自己没有感染风险,以及担心接种疫苗可能产生副作用。与疫苗接种犹豫率低相关的因素是受教育程度较高、对感染疾病风险的认识较高、相信疫苗接种有效以及疫苗容易获得:结论:要提高 PMI 的疫苗接种率,就必须提高认识、提供准确信息并确保疫苗更容易获得。精神卫生专业人员需要在提供教育和澄清弱势患者群体的误解方面发挥积极作用,以帮助减轻疫苗接种犹豫。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol dependence syndrome in patients with alcoholic liver disease: A cross sectional observational study. 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA)-induced anxiety disorder in a young female. A cross-sectional study of stressful life events and quality of life among FGID and non-FGID patients. A cross-sectional study on domestic violence among infertile women in western Iran. Advocating for responsible use of malingering diagnosis in psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1