Hossein Shahinfar, Nastaran Payandeh, Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh, Kimia Torabynasab, Ahmad Jayedi, Haniehsadat Ejtahed, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Sakineh Shab-Bidar
{"title":"Comparative effects of different beverages on weight loss in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials","authors":"Hossein Shahinfar, Nastaran Payandeh, Sheida Zeraattalab-Motlagh, Kimia Torabynasab, Ahmad Jayedi, Haniehsadat Ejtahed, Shirin Hasani-Ranjbar, Sakineh Shab-Bidar","doi":"10.1038/s41366-024-01673-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a lack of clarity on the comparative effects of different beverages on weight loss in adults. This study aimed at quantifying and ranking the effects of different beverages on weight loss. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 2023. We included randomized trials evaluating the comparative effects of two or more beverages, or compared a beverage against a control group (water, no intervention), for weight loss in adults. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) with a Bayesian framework to estimate mean difference [MD] and 95% credible interval [CrI]. In total, 78 randomized trials with 4168 participants were eligible. Low/no-calorie sweetened beverages (LNCSB) was effective for weight loss compared with water (MD: −0.79 kg, 95% CrI: −1.35, −0.18), milk (MD: −0.80 kg, 95% CrI: −1.59, −0.01), fruit juice (MD: −0.83 kg, 95% CrI: −1.47, −0.13), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (MD: −1.08 kg, 95% CrI: −1.65, −0.50), and no intervention (MD: −1.19 kg, 95% CrI: −1.93, −0.41). However, in sensitivity analyses, no significant effect was seen in trials with a low risk of bias and those that implemented calorie restriction. LNCSB drinking was effective for waist circumference reduction compared with water (MD: −1.85 cm, 95% CrI: −3.47, −0.22). The certainty of evidence from most comparisons was rated low. This study suggested evidence of low certainty that intake of LNCSBs can result in a small weight loss when used as a substitute for other beverages. Considering the low certainty of evidence, more research is needed to compare the effects of different beverages on body weight. Not applicable, but the protocol of this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023407937).","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":"49 4","pages":"578-585"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41366-024-01673-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is a lack of clarity on the comparative effects of different beverages on weight loss in adults. This study aimed at quantifying and ranking the effects of different beverages on weight loss. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science up to January 2023. We included randomized trials evaluating the comparative effects of two or more beverages, or compared a beverage against a control group (water, no intervention), for weight loss in adults. We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA) with a Bayesian framework to estimate mean difference [MD] and 95% credible interval [CrI]. In total, 78 randomized trials with 4168 participants were eligible. Low/no-calorie sweetened beverages (LNCSB) was effective for weight loss compared with water (MD: −0.79 kg, 95% CrI: −1.35, −0.18), milk (MD: −0.80 kg, 95% CrI: −1.59, −0.01), fruit juice (MD: −0.83 kg, 95% CrI: −1.47, −0.13), sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) (MD: −1.08 kg, 95% CrI: −1.65, −0.50), and no intervention (MD: −1.19 kg, 95% CrI: −1.93, −0.41). However, in sensitivity analyses, no significant effect was seen in trials with a low risk of bias and those that implemented calorie restriction. LNCSB drinking was effective for waist circumference reduction compared with water (MD: −1.85 cm, 95% CrI: −3.47, −0.22). The certainty of evidence from most comparisons was rated low. This study suggested evidence of low certainty that intake of LNCSBs can result in a small weight loss when used as a substitute for other beverages. Considering the low certainty of evidence, more research is needed to compare the effects of different beverages on body weight. Not applicable, but the protocol of this systematic review was registered at PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42023407937).
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders.
We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.