Yield of routine mycobacterial culture of osteoarticular specimens in a tertiary orthopaedic hospital in England, 2017-2022.

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Journal of Bone and Joint Infection Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5194/jbji-9-217-2024
Tom A Yates, Olivier Vahesan, Simon Warren, Antonia Scobie
{"title":"Yield of routine mycobacterial culture of osteoarticular specimens in a tertiary orthopaedic hospital in England, 2017-2022.","authors":"Tom A Yates, Olivier Vahesan, Simon Warren, Antonia Scobie","doi":"10.5194/jbji-9-217-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: At our tertiary orthopaedic centre, mycobacterial cultures are routinely performed on bone and joint samples sent for bacterial culture. <b>Methods</b>: From laboratory records, we ascertained the number of mycobacterial cultures performed, the number positive for <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> complex (MTBC) and/or non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and the characteristics of individuals from whom mycobacteria were isolated. We collected the same data from 100 individuals with negative mycobacterial cultures. <b>Results</b>: Excluding sample types that were not bone or joint samples, 6162 mycobacterial cultures were performed between 4 July 2017 and 30 September 2022. A total of 22 patients had MTBC and 6 patients had NTM newly isolated from bone or joint samples placed in mycobacterial culture, while a further 1 patient had both <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> and <i>Mycobacterium avium</i> isolated. To identify one new mycobacterial infection of bone or joint (MTBC or NTM) that would not have been detected with routine bacterial cultures alone, 229 (95 % CI of 158-347) mycobacterial cultures were needed. Mycobacterial cultures were much less likely to be positive in samples taken from prosthetic joints. They were more likely to be positive in spinal samples and in samples taken from patients with suspected sarcoma. In patients from whom MTBC had been isolated, granulomatous inflammation was reported in 86 % (18 of 21) of contemporaneous histological specimens. <b>Conclusions</b>: Targeted, rather than routine, mycobacterial culture of bone and joint specimens should be considered in settings with a low burden of tuberculosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","volume":"9 5","pages":"217-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11554712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone and Joint Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/jbji-9-217-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: At our tertiary orthopaedic centre, mycobacterial cultures are routinely performed on bone and joint samples sent for bacterial culture. Methods: From laboratory records, we ascertained the number of mycobacterial cultures performed, the number positive for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and/or non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), and the characteristics of individuals from whom mycobacteria were isolated. We collected the same data from 100 individuals with negative mycobacterial cultures. Results: Excluding sample types that were not bone or joint samples, 6162 mycobacterial cultures were performed between 4 July 2017 and 30 September 2022. A total of 22 patients had MTBC and 6 patients had NTM newly isolated from bone or joint samples placed in mycobacterial culture, while a further 1 patient had both Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium isolated. To identify one new mycobacterial infection of bone or joint (MTBC or NTM) that would not have been detected with routine bacterial cultures alone, 229 (95 % CI of 158-347) mycobacterial cultures were needed. Mycobacterial cultures were much less likely to be positive in samples taken from prosthetic joints. They were more likely to be positive in spinal samples and in samples taken from patients with suspected sarcoma. In patients from whom MTBC had been isolated, granulomatous inflammation was reported in 86 % (18 of 21) of contemporaneous histological specimens. Conclusions: Targeted, rather than routine, mycobacterial culture of bone and joint specimens should be considered in settings with a low burden of tuberculosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2017-2022 年英国一家三级骨科医院骨关节标本的常规霉菌培养产量。
导言:在我们的三级骨科中心,对送去进行细菌培养的骨和关节样本进行霉菌培养是常规做法。方法:我们从实验室记录中确定了霉菌培养阳性的数量:根据实验室记录,我们确定了进行分枝杆菌培养的数量、结核分枝杆菌复合体(MTBC)和/或非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)阳性的数量,以及分离出分枝杆菌的患者的特征。我们还从分枝杆菌培养阴性的 100 人中收集了同样的数据。研究结果除去非骨或关节样本类型,2017 年 7 月 4 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间共进行了 6162 次分枝杆菌培养。共有 22 名患者从进行分枝杆菌培养的骨或关节样本中新分离出 MTBC 和 6 名 NTM,另有 1 名患者同时分离出结核分枝杆菌和鸟分枝杆菌。要发现一种仅靠常规细菌培养无法检测到的新的骨或关节分枝杆菌感染(MTBC 或 NTM),需要进行 229 次(95 % CI 为 158-347 次)分枝杆菌培养。从人工关节采集的样本中,分枝杆菌培养呈阳性的几率要低得多。在脊柱样本和疑似肉瘤患者的样本中,分枝杆菌培养呈阳性的几率更高。在已分离出 MTBC 的患者中,86%(21 例中的 18 例)的同期组织学标本中报告有肉芽肿性炎症。结论是在结核病发病率较低的情况下,应考虑对骨和关节标本进行有针对性的分枝杆菌培养,而不是常规培养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring the potential of naturally occurring antimicrobials for managing orthopedic-device-related infections. A combined debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure with flap coverage for acute soft tissue defects following total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study. Predicting periprosthetic joint infection: external validation of preoperative prediction models. Glenohumeral joint septic arthritis and osteomyelitis caused by Moraxella catarrhalis after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: case report and literature review. Yield of routine mycobacterial culture of osteoarticular specimens in a tertiary orthopaedic hospital in England, 2017-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1