Comparing a Model of Augmented Postpartum Primary Care to Usual Care in an Urban Medical Center.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09165-z
Sam Wainwright, Anne Elizabeth Glassgow, Abigail Holicky, Eric Kim, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Kavya Anjur, Shreya Bellur, Rachel Caskey
{"title":"Comparing a Model of Augmented Postpartum Primary Care to Usual Care in an Urban Medical Center.","authors":"Sam Wainwright, Anne Elizabeth Glassgow, Abigail Holicky, Eric Kim, Melissa Wagner-Schuman, Kavya Anjur, Shreya Bellur, Rachel Caskey","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09165-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The US faces a maternal health crisis and struggles to deliver recommended postpartum care. In some populations, less than half of mothers attend a postpartum visit.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine if a two-generation (Two-Gen) model of interdisciplinary, postpartum primary care was associated with increased visit attendance for postpartum care, primary care, and behavioral health.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective study of care delivered at a single, urban, academic, safety-net medical center between 2020 and 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Mothers who received postpartum care in Two-Gen and a comparison group who received usual postpartum care.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Adjusted logistic regression to estimate the effect of Two-Gen participation on the odds of attending an early (birth-to-3 weeks) postpartum visit, later (4-to-12 weeks) postpartum visit, OB/GYN visit, and primary care visit.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 247 mothers (98 Two-Gen and 149 usual care) were included for analysis. Most identified as Non-Hispanic Black (55%) or Hispanic (34%) and had Medicaid insurance (74%). On average, Two-Gen mothers were younger and more likely to be primiparous. Compared to usual care, Two-Gen mothers had similar rates of early postpartum visits (79% vs 64%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-3.14) and were significantly more likely to have a later postpartum visit (92% vs 79%; aOR 2.46; 95%CI 1.06-5.74) in adjusted analyses. Almost all Two-Gen mothers (97%) had a visit with a primary care doctor in the first postpartum year, compared to 19% of mothers receiving usual care (aOR 12.95; 95%CI 6.80-24.68). Of those with behavioral health diagnoses, Two-Gen mothers had higher rates of psychiatrist visits than usual care mothers (49% vs 13%; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Two-Gen clinic participation was associated with high rates of timely postpartum care in a group of predominantly young, publicly insured, racial, and ethnic minority mothers and compared favorably to usual care across multiple metrics, notably utilization of primary and behavioral health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09165-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The US faces a maternal health crisis and struggles to deliver recommended postpartum care. In some populations, less than half of mothers attend a postpartum visit.

Objective: To determine if a two-generation (Two-Gen) model of interdisciplinary, postpartum primary care was associated with increased visit attendance for postpartum care, primary care, and behavioral health.

Design: Retrospective study of care delivered at a single, urban, academic, safety-net medical center between 2020 and 2023.

Participants: Mothers who received postpartum care in Two-Gen and a comparison group who received usual postpartum care.

Main measures: Adjusted logistic regression to estimate the effect of Two-Gen participation on the odds of attending an early (birth-to-3 weeks) postpartum visit, later (4-to-12 weeks) postpartum visit, OB/GYN visit, and primary care visit.

Key results: A total of 247 mothers (98 Two-Gen and 149 usual care) were included for analysis. Most identified as Non-Hispanic Black (55%) or Hispanic (34%) and had Medicaid insurance (74%). On average, Two-Gen mothers were younger and more likely to be primiparous. Compared to usual care, Two-Gen mothers had similar rates of early postpartum visits (79% vs 64%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92-3.14) and were significantly more likely to have a later postpartum visit (92% vs 79%; aOR 2.46; 95%CI 1.06-5.74) in adjusted analyses. Almost all Two-Gen mothers (97%) had a visit with a primary care doctor in the first postpartum year, compared to 19% of mothers receiving usual care (aOR 12.95; 95%CI 6.80-24.68). Of those with behavioral health diagnoses, Two-Gen mothers had higher rates of psychiatrist visits than usual care mothers (49% vs 13%; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Two-Gen clinic participation was associated with high rates of timely postpartum care in a group of predominantly young, publicly insured, racial, and ethnic minority mothers and compared favorably to usual care across multiple metrics, notably utilization of primary and behavioral health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个城市医疗中心的产后基础护理强化模式与常规护理的比较。
背景:美国面临孕产妇健康危机,难以提供建议的产后护理。在一些人群中,只有不到一半的母亲参加产后就诊:目的:确定两代(Two-Gen)跨学科产后基础护理模式是否与产后护理、基础护理和行为健康就诊率的提高有关:设计:对一家城市学术安全网医疗中心在 2020 年至 2023 年期间提供的护理服务进行回顾性研究:主要测量指标:主要测量指标:通过调整后的逻辑回归估计参与 "双基因 "计划对产后早期(出生至 3 周)就诊、产后晚期(4 至 12 周)就诊、产科/妇科就诊和初级保健就诊几率的影响:共有 247 名母亲(98 名双基因母亲和 149 名常规护理母亲)被纳入分析范围。大多数人被认定为非西班牙裔黑人(55%)或西班牙裔(34%),并有医疗补助保险(74%)。平均而言,双基因母亲更年轻,更有可能是初产妇。与常规护理相比,"双基因 "母亲的产后早期就诊率相似(79% 对 64%;调整后的几率比 (aOR) 1.70;95% 置信区间 (CI)0.92-3.14),但在调整后的分析中,产后晚期就诊率明显更高(92% 对 79%;调整后的几率比 2.46;95% 置信区间 (CI)1.06-5.74)。几乎所有 "双基因 "母亲(97%)都在产后第一年接受过初级保健医生的诊治,而接受常规护理的母亲中只有 19% 接受过初级保健医生的诊治(aOR 12.95;95%CI 6.80-24.68)。在有行为健康诊断的母亲中,"双基因 "母亲看精神科医生的比例高于接受常规护理的母亲(49% vs 13%;P = 0.001):结论:"双基因 "诊所的参与与高产后及时护理率有关,这群母亲主要是年轻的、有公共保险的、少数种族和少数族裔的母亲,在多项指标上,"双基因 "诊所都优于常规护理,尤其是初级和行为健康护理的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Demographic Trends in the Use of Audio-Video and Audio-Only Telehealth by Arizona Medicaid Beneficiaries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Private Equity Penetration in Behavioral Health in the United States, 2010-2022. Approach to Estimating Adherence to Heart Failure Medications Using Linked Electronic Health Record and Pharmacy Data. Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1