Associations Between State Policies Facilitating Telehealth and Buprenorphine Episode Initiation and Duration Early in the COVID Pandemic : State Telehealth Policies and Buprenorphine.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09188-6
Bradley D Stein, Brendan K Saloner, Flora Sheng, Mark Sorbero, Andrew W Dick, Adam J Gordon
{"title":"Associations Between State Policies Facilitating Telehealth and Buprenorphine Episode Initiation and Duration Early in the COVID Pandemic : State Telehealth Policies and Buprenorphine.","authors":"Bradley D Stein, Brendan K Saloner, Flora Sheng, Mark Sorbero, Andrew W Dick, Adam J Gordon","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09188-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>State policies facilitating telehealth implemented early in COVID may support buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder. However, little empirical information is available about those policies' effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine association between state policies that may facilitate telehealth use and buprenorphine treatment.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, participants: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using 2019-2020 national pharmacy data on dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>State policies implemented after March 3, 2020, public health emergency declaration requiring private insurers' telehealth reimbursement to be commensurate with in-person service reimbursement, authorizing Medicaid reimbursement for audio-only telehealth, allowing physicians to provide cross-state telehealth services, and allowing psychologists to provide cross-state telehealth services.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>(a) Duration of treatment episodes started between March 1 and March 13 in both 2019 and 2020, and (b) daily numbers of new buprenorphine treatment episodes from March 13 through December 31 in each year.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>We found little change in the number of new buprenorphine treatment episodes started in 2020 compared to 2019 and an increase in treatment duration of 10.3 days (95%CI 8.3 to 12.2 days) for episodes started in March 2020 before the public health emergency declaration compared to the comparable 2019 period. States implementing a telehealth parity policy in 2020 had 7.3% (95%CI - 13.3% to - 0.4%) fewer new buprenorphine treatment episodes. States joining the psychologist interstate compact in 2020 after the public health emergency declaration had treatment episodes 7.97 days longer (95%CI 0.78 to 15.16) than other states. None of the other policies examined was associated with changes in new treatment episodes or treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Policies undertaken during the pandemic we examined were associated with few significant changes in buprenorphine treatment initiation and duration. Findings suggest realizing the benefits of telehealth and other policy changes for buprenorphine may require more extensive implementation and infrastructure support.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09188-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: State policies facilitating telehealth implemented early in COVID may support buprenorphine treatment of opioid use disorder. However, little empirical information is available about those policies' effects.

Objective: Examine association between state policies that may facilitate telehealth use and buprenorphine treatment.

Design, setting, participants: Retrospective cohort study using 2019-2020 national pharmacy data on dispensed buprenorphine prescriptions.

Exposures: State policies implemented after March 3, 2020, public health emergency declaration requiring private insurers' telehealth reimbursement to be commensurate with in-person service reimbursement, authorizing Medicaid reimbursement for audio-only telehealth, allowing physicians to provide cross-state telehealth services, and allowing psychologists to provide cross-state telehealth services.

Main outcomes and measures: (a) Duration of treatment episodes started between March 1 and March 13 in both 2019 and 2020, and (b) daily numbers of new buprenorphine treatment episodes from March 13 through December 31 in each year.

Key results: We found little change in the number of new buprenorphine treatment episodes started in 2020 compared to 2019 and an increase in treatment duration of 10.3 days (95%CI 8.3 to 12.2 days) for episodes started in March 2020 before the public health emergency declaration compared to the comparable 2019 period. States implementing a telehealth parity policy in 2020 had 7.3% (95%CI - 13.3% to - 0.4%) fewer new buprenorphine treatment episodes. States joining the psychologist interstate compact in 2020 after the public health emergency declaration had treatment episodes 7.97 days longer (95%CI 0.78 to 15.16) than other states. None of the other policies examined was associated with changes in new treatment episodes or treatment duration.

Conclusions and relevance: Policies undertaken during the pandemic we examined were associated with few significant changes in buprenorphine treatment initiation and duration. Findings suggest realizing the benefits of telehealth and other policy changes for buprenorphine may require more extensive implementation and infrastructure support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 COVID 大流行的早期,促进远程医疗的州政策与丁丙诺啡发作开始和持续时间之间的关系:州远程医疗政策与丁丙诺啡。
重要性:在 COVID 早期实施的促进远程医疗的州政策可能会支持丁丙诺啡治疗阿片类药物使用障碍。然而,有关这些政策效果的实证信息却很少:研究可促进远程医疗使用的州政策与丁丙诺啡治疗之间的关联:使用 2019-2020 年全国药房的丁丙诺啡处方配药数据进行回顾性队列研究:在 2020 年 3 月 3 日公共卫生紧急状况声明之后实施的州政策,要求私人保险公司的远程医疗报销与亲身服务报销相称,授权医疗补助对仅音频的远程医疗进行报销,允许医生提供跨州远程医疗服务,允许心理学家提供跨州远程医疗服务:(主要结果和衡量标准:(a)2019 年和 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 3 月 13 日期间开始治疗的持续时间,以及(b)每年 3 月 13 日至 12 月 31 日期间每天新增的丁丙诺啡治疗次数:我们发现,与 2019 年相比,2020 年新开始的丁丙诺啡治疗次数变化不大;与 2019 年同期相比,在宣布公共卫生紧急状态之前的 2020 年 3 月开始的治疗次数的治疗时间增加了 10.3 天(95%CI 为 8.3 至 12.2 天)。2020年实施远程医疗均等政策的州新增丁丙诺啡治疗病例减少了7.3%(95%CI-13.3%至-0.4%)。在宣布公共卫生紧急状况后于 2020 年加入心理学家州际契约的州,其治疗发作时间比其他州长 7.97 天(95%CI 为 0.78-15.16 天)。所研究的其他政策均与新的治疗发作或治疗持续时间的变化无关:我们所研究的大流行期间所采取的政策与丁丙诺啡治疗的开始时间和持续时间的显著变化关系不大。研究结果表明,要实现远程医疗和其他丁丙诺啡政策变化的益处,可能需要更广泛的实施和基础设施支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1