Survival and Complication Rates of Feldspathic, Leucite-Reinforced, Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-11-10 DOI:10.1111/jerd.13351
Patrick Klein, Frank A Spitznagel, Anja Zembic, Lea S Prott, Stefano Pieralli, Brenda Bongaerts, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Robert Langner, Petra C Gierthmuehlen
{"title":"Survival and Complication Rates of Feldspathic, Leucite-Reinforced, Lithium Disilicate and Zirconia Ceramic Laminate Veneers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Patrick Klein, Frank A Spitznagel, Anja Zembic, Lea S Prott, Stefano Pieralli, Brenda Bongaerts, Maria-Inti Metzendorf, Robert Langner, Petra C Gierthmuehlen","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze survival and complication rates for anterior and premolar laminate-veneers out of different ceramic materials (feldspathic, leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic [LRGC], lithium-disilicate [LDS] and zirconia).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases for clinical studies on ceramic laminate-veneers with a minimum-follow-up of ≥ 1 year. The date of last search was on February 19, 2024. Survival, technical, esthetic and biological events were assessed for different laminate-veneer materials at three observation periods (short- [1-3 years], mid- [4-6 years] and long-term [≥ 7 years]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled survival-rate of 96.13% for feldspathic, 93.70% for LRGC and 96.81% for LDS at 10.4 years. No difference was found between materials. Complication rates (technical/esthetic/biological) were as follows: Feldspathic: 41.48%/19.64%/6.51%; LRGC: 29.87%/17.89%/4.4%; LDS: 6.1%/1.9%/0.45% at 10.4 years. Zirconia showed a 100% survival-rate with no complications at 2.6 years. No long-term data was available for zirconia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Feldspathic, LRGC and LDS laminate-veneers showed high survival-rates at long-term observation. LDS slightly outperforms feldspathic and LRGC laminate-veneers with lower long-term complication rates. More studies providing long-term data on zirconia laminate-veneers are needed.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Ceramic laminate-veneers are a reliable treatment option. LDS may be preferred as a restorative material for long-term success.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13351","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze survival and complication rates for anterior and premolar laminate-veneers out of different ceramic materials (feldspathic, leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic [LRGC], lithium-disilicate [LDS] and zirconia).

Material and methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across multiple databases for clinical studies on ceramic laminate-veneers with a minimum-follow-up of ≥ 1 year. The date of last search was on February 19, 2024. Survival, technical, esthetic and biological events were assessed for different laminate-veneer materials at three observation periods (short- [1-3 years], mid- [4-6 years] and long-term [≥ 7 years]).

Results: Twenty-nine studies were included. Meta-analysis revealed a pooled survival-rate of 96.13% for feldspathic, 93.70% for LRGC and 96.81% for LDS at 10.4 years. No difference was found between materials. Complication rates (technical/esthetic/biological) were as follows: Feldspathic: 41.48%/19.64%/6.51%; LRGC: 29.87%/17.89%/4.4%; LDS: 6.1%/1.9%/0.45% at 10.4 years. Zirconia showed a 100% survival-rate with no complications at 2.6 years. No long-term data was available for zirconia.

Conclusions: Feldspathic, LRGC and LDS laminate-veneers showed high survival-rates at long-term observation. LDS slightly outperforms feldspathic and LRGC laminate-veneers with lower long-term complication rates. More studies providing long-term data on zirconia laminate-veneers are needed.

Clinical significance: Ceramic laminate-veneers are a reliable treatment option. LDS may be preferred as a restorative material for long-term success.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长石、褐铁矿强化、二硅酸锂和氧化锆陶瓷贴面的存活率和并发症发生率:系统回顾与元分析》。
目的分析不同陶瓷材料(长石、钙钛矿强化玻璃陶瓷[LRGC]、二硅酸锂[LDS]和氧化锆)制成的前牙和前臼齿覆膜基台的存活率和并发症发生率:我们在多个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索,以了解至少随访 ≥ 1 年的陶瓷基底瓣临床研究。最后一次搜索日期为 2024 年 2 月 19 日。在三个观察期内(短期[1-3年]、中期[4-6年]和长期[≥7年]),对不同陶瓷基底板材料的存活率、技术、美学和生物学事件进行了评估:结果:共纳入 29 项研究。Meta 分析表明,在 10.4 年的存活率中,长石材料为 96.13%,LRGC 为 93.70%,LDS 为 96.81%。不同材料之间没有差异。并发症(技术/美学/生物学)发生率如下:长石:41.48%/19.64%/6.51%;LRGC:29.87%/17.89%/4.4%;LDS:6.1%/1.9%/0.45%(10.4 年)。氧化锆的存活率为100%,2.6年无并发症。没有关于氧化锆的长期数据:结论:长石、LRGC和LDS层状文氏体在长期观察中显示出较高的存活率。LDS的长期并发症发生率较低,略优于长石和LRGC覆膜veneers。临床意义:临床意义:陶瓷基台是一种可靠的治疗选择。临床意义:陶瓷覆膜veneers是一种可靠的治疗选择,LDS可能是获得长期成功的首选修复材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry
Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features. The range of topics covered in the journal includes: - Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts - Implants - Conservative adhesive restorations - Tooth Whitening - Prosthodontic materials and techniques - Dental materials - Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics - Esthetics related research - Innovations in esthetics
期刊最新文献
Introducing a novel approach to dental color reproduction using AI technology. Digital Guides for Precise U-Shaped Splitting and Simultaneous Implant Placement With Minimal Surgical Trauma. Survival and Complications of Partial Coverage Restorations on Posterior Teeth-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. B-Guide System: Improving the Predictability of Complete-Arch Implant and Prosthetic Placement Using Fixed Prosthesis Guides. Advances in Dental Restorations: A Comprehensive Review of Machinable and 3D-Printed Ceramic-Reinforced Composites.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1