FGFR2 fusions assessed by NGS, FISH, and immunohistochemistry in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1007/s00535-024-02175-y
Zi Cao, Yichen Yang, Shasha Liu, Lin Sun, Yanxue Liu, Ye Luo, Jian Wang, Yan Sun
{"title":"FGFR2 fusions assessed by NGS, FISH, and immunohistochemistry in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.","authors":"Zi Cao, Yichen Yang, Shasha Liu, Lin Sun, Yanxue Liu, Ye Luo, Jian Wang, Yan Sun","doi":"10.1007/s00535-024-02175-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>FGFR2 fusion has become a promising therapeutic target in iCCAs; however, the procedure for screening FGFR2 fusion has not been conventionally developed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FGFR2 fusion was identified using DNA + RNA-based NGS and FISH, and the concordance between DNA + RNA-based NGS, FISH, and IHC was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FGFR2 fusions were detected in 9 out of 76 iCCAs (11.8%). The consistency of FISH and DNA + RNA-based NGS for FGFR2 fusions was high (κ value = 0.867, P = 0.001), while the consistency of IHC and DNA + RNA-based NGS was lower (κ value = 0.464, P = 0.072). All nine FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCAs were MSS with a median TMB of 2.1 mut/Mb, and only one had a CPS (PD-L1) above 5. Two FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA patients were treated with and benefited from FGFR inhibitor therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>FGFR2 fusion should be assessed for advanced iCCA patients. We recommend DNA + RNA-based NGS as the preferred option to supply all possible therapeutic targets. FISH should be preferred if the tumor sample is insufficient for NGS or if the patient is inclined to receive FGFR inhibitors promptly. Although IHC is not the preferred method to identify FGFR2 fusion, it might be used as preliminary screening for FGFR2 alterations if the hospital cannot offer NGS or FISH, and the results need to be validated before FGFR2 inhibitors treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02175-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: FGFR2 fusion has become a promising therapeutic target in iCCAs; however, the procedure for screening FGFR2 fusion has not been conventionally developed.

Methods: FGFR2 fusion was identified using DNA + RNA-based NGS and FISH, and the concordance between DNA + RNA-based NGS, FISH, and IHC was compared.

Results: FGFR2 fusions were detected in 9 out of 76 iCCAs (11.8%). The consistency of FISH and DNA + RNA-based NGS for FGFR2 fusions was high (κ value = 0.867, P = 0.001), while the consistency of IHC and DNA + RNA-based NGS was lower (κ value = 0.464, P = 0.072). All nine FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCAs were MSS with a median TMB of 2.1 mut/Mb, and only one had a CPS (PD-L1) above 5. Two FGFR2 fusion-positive iCCA patients were treated with and benefited from FGFR inhibitor therapy.

Conclusions: FGFR2 fusion should be assessed for advanced iCCA patients. We recommend DNA + RNA-based NGS as the preferred option to supply all possible therapeutic targets. FISH should be preferred if the tumor sample is insufficient for NGS or if the patient is inclined to receive FGFR inhibitors promptly. Although IHC is not the preferred method to identify FGFR2 fusion, it might be used as preliminary screening for FGFR2 alterations if the hospital cannot offer NGS or FISH, and the results need to be validated before FGFR2 inhibitors treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过 NGS、FISH 和免疫组化评估肝内胆管癌中的 FGFR2 融合。
背景:表皮生长因子受体2(FGFR2)融合已成为iCCA中一个有前景的治疗靶点;然而,筛选FGFR2融合的程序尚未形成惯例:采用基于 DNA + RNA 的 NGS 和 FISH 方法鉴定 FGFR2 融合,并比较基于 DNA + RNA 的 NGS、FISH 和 IHC 的一致性:76例iCCA中有9例(11.8%)检测到FGFR2融合。FISH 和基于 DNA + RNA 的 NGS 检测 FGFR2 融合的一致性很高(κ值 = 0.867,P = 0.001),而 IHC 和基于 DNA + RNA 的 NGS 的一致性较低(κ值 = 0.464,P = 0.072)。所有九例 FGFR2 融合阳性 iCCA 均为 MSS,中位 TMB 为 2.1 mut/Mb,只有一例的 CPS(PD-L1)高于 5。两名FGFR2融合阳性iCCA患者接受了FGFR抑制剂治疗并从中获益:结论:晚期iCCA患者应进行FGFR2融合评估。我们建议首选基于 DNA + RNA 的 NGS,以提供所有可能的治疗靶点。如果肿瘤样本不足以进行 NGS,或患者倾向于及时接受 FGFR 抑制剂,则应首选 FISH。虽然 IHC 并非鉴别 FGFR2 融合的首选方法,但如果医院无法提供 NGS 或 FISH,且在 FGFR2 抑制剂治疗前需要验证结果,则 IHC 可用作 FGFR2 改变的初步筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.
期刊最新文献
Publisher Correction: CRAFITY score as a predictive marker for refractoriness to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. Alcohol-associated liver disease increases the risk of muscle loss and mortality in patients with cirrhosis. Small extracellular vesicles derived from adipose mesenchymal stem cells alleviate intestinal fibrosis by inhibiting the FAK/Akt signaling pathway via MFGE8. Response to letter to the editor regarding: "Alcohol-associated liver disease increases the risk of muscle reduction and mortality in patients with cirrhosis". Association of circulating cytokine levels and tissue-infiltrating myeloid cells with achalasia: results from Mendelian randomization and validation through clinical characteristics and single-cell RNA sequencing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1