Bacterial Superinfections in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1177/08850666241298229
Anfal Y Al-Ali, Abdul Salam, Osama Almuslim, Maha Alayouny, Mohammed Alhabib, Nada AlQadheeb
{"title":"Bacterial Superinfections in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Anfal Y Al-Ali, Abdul Salam, Osama Almuslim, Maha Alayouny, Mohammed Alhabib, Nada AlQadheeb","doi":"10.1177/08850666241298229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a considerable gap in the current evidence concerning the prevalence of superinfections among critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the prevalence of bacterial superinfections following the initiation of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational study that included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 hours and received empirical antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of bacterial superinfections occurring at least 48 hours after the initiation of antibiotics. ICU-related outcomes and complications were compared between subgroups with and without superinfections and amongst the two most frequently used antibiotic regimens.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 230 patients were included in our study. Superinfections developed in 40 (17.4%) patients, with the median time from the first dose of antibiotic to the emergence of superinfection of 17.6 days (IQR 9.8-29.2). Patients with superinfections had longer median ICU stays [ 27.1 days(IQR 15.2-43.3) versus 7.1 days(IQR 3.8-11.8); <i>P</i> < 0.001], developed more complications [92.5% versus 52.6%; <i>P</i> < 0.001], and had higher ICU mortality [45.0% versus 22.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.0034] compared to patients without superinfections. The two most frequently prescribed antibiotic regimens were piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin (53.9%) and meropenem plus levofloxacin (19.7%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of superinfections [15.3% versus 26.7%; <i>P</i> = 0.09] between the two groups, patients in the superinfections group who received piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin developed more complications [94.7% versus 91.7%; <i>P</i> < 0.001] and had a higher ICU mortality [57.9% versus 50%; <i>P</i> < 0.001].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Superinfections occurred at a higher rate in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection post empirical antibiotics initiation. The use of piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin was associated with an increase in the rate of complications and higher ICU mortality. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241298229"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241298229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a considerable gap in the current evidence concerning the prevalence of superinfections among critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in Saudi Arabia.

Objectives: We sought to determine the prevalence of bacterial superinfections following the initiation of antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Methods: A retrospective observational study that included patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for at least 24 hours and received empirical antibiotic therapy. The primary outcome was the rate of bacterial superinfections occurring at least 48 hours after the initiation of antibiotics. ICU-related outcomes and complications were compared between subgroups with and without superinfections and amongst the two most frequently used antibiotic regimens.

Results: A total of 230 patients were included in our study. Superinfections developed in 40 (17.4%) patients, with the median time from the first dose of antibiotic to the emergence of superinfection of 17.6 days (IQR 9.8-29.2). Patients with superinfections had longer median ICU stays [ 27.1 days(IQR 15.2-43.3) versus 7.1 days(IQR 3.8-11.8); P < 0.001], developed more complications [92.5% versus 52.6%; P < 0.001], and had higher ICU mortality [45.0% versus 22.1%; P = 0.0034] compared to patients without superinfections. The two most frequently prescribed antibiotic regimens were piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin (53.9%) and meropenem plus levofloxacin (19.7%). Although there was no significant difference in the rate of superinfections [15.3% versus 26.7%; P = 0.09] between the two groups, patients in the superinfections group who received piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin developed more complications [94.7% versus 91.7%; P < 0.001] and had a higher ICU mortality [57.9% versus 50%; P < 0.001].

Conclusion: Superinfections occurred at a higher rate in critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection post empirical antibiotics initiation. The use of piperacillin/tazobactam plus levofloxacin was associated with an increase in the rate of complications and higher ICU mortality. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SARS-CoV-2 感染重症患者的细菌超级感染:回顾性队列研究
背景:在沙特阿拉伯,关于感染 SARS-CoV-2 的重症患者中超级感染的现有证据存在相当大的差距:关于沙特阿拉伯感染 SARS-CoV-2 的重症患者中超级感染的发生率,目前的证据还存在相当大的差距:我们试图确定感染 SARS-CoV-2 的重症患者开始接受抗生素治疗后细菌超级感染的发生率:方法: 这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象包括入住重症监护室(ICU)至少 24 小时并接受经验性抗生素治疗的 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者。研究的主要结果是开始使用抗生素至少 48 小时后的细菌超级感染率。对有无超级感染的亚组以及两种最常用的抗生素方案进行了ICU相关结果和并发症的比较:研究共纳入 230 名患者。40例(17.4%)患者出现了超级感染,从首次使用抗生素到出现超级感染的中位时间为17.6天(IQR为9.8-29.2)。与没有超级感染的患者相比,超级感染患者在重症监护室的中位住院时间更长[27.1天(IQR 15.2-43.3)对7.1天(IQR 3.8-11.8);P P = 0.0034]。最常处方的两种抗生素方案是哌拉西林/他唑巴坦加左氧氟沙星(53.9%)和美罗培南加左氧氟沙星(19.7%)。虽然两组患者的超级感染率没有明显差异[15.3%对26.7%;P = 0.09],但接受哌拉西林/他唑巴坦加左氧氟沙星治疗的超级感染组患者出现更多并发症[94.7%对91.7%;P P 结论:SARS-CoV-2感染的重症患者在使用经验性抗生素后发生超级感染的比例较高。使用哌拉西林/他唑巴坦加左氧氟沙星与并发症发生率增加和重症监护病房死亡率升高有关。需要更大规模的多中心研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Dexmedetomidine in non-Mechanically Ventilated COVID-19 Critically ill Patients: A Multicentre Cohort Study. Spinal Cord Injury Following Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Overlooked and Underreported Complication. Ultrasound-Guided Venous Catheter Placement in Prone Position. Assessing the Role of Blood Gas Analysis in COVID-19 Patients for Early Warning and Clinical Guidance. Bacterial Superinfections in Critically Ill Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1