Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures?

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000002933
Adam Boissonneault, Robert V O'Toole, Roman Hayda, J Spence Reid, Cyrus Caroom, Anthony Carlini, Arman Dagal, Renan Castillo, Madhav Karunakar, Paul Matuszewski, Robert Hymes, Nathan N O'Hara
{"title":"Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures?","authors":"Adam Boissonneault, Robert V O'Toole, Roman Hayda, J Spence Reid, Cyrus Caroom, Anthony Carlini, Arman Dagal, Renan Castillo, Madhav Karunakar, Paul Matuszewski, Robert Hymes, Nathan N O'Hara","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000002933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the association between closed suction drainage and postoperative infection in patients with tibial plateau or pilon fractures. Secondarily, this study assessed if intrawound vancomycin powder modified the association of closed surgical drains with infection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Secondary analysis of the Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Operatively Treated High-risk Tibia Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial (VANCO) trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>36 academic trauma centers.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients with high-risk tibia fractures (OTA/AO classification 41B/C or 43B/C) from the VANCO trial were considered. Closed suction drains were placed based on the treating surgeon's discretion. Patients were randomly assigned to received 1-gram intrawound vancomycin powder in the surgical wound at definitive fixation or the standard infection prevention protocol at each center.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Deep surgical site infection (SSI) within 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients treated with and without drains. Subgroup analysis also examined the effect of drains in patients with and without intrawound vancomycin powder.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 978 study patients, 197 (20%) were treated with drains. Deep infection rates did not significantly differ between patients with or without surgical drains (8% versus 8%, p=0.88). However, intrawound vancomycin powder significantly modified the association of surgical drains on deep SSI (interaction p=0.048). Specifically, patients with drains but no vancomycin powder had the highest deep infection rate (13%; 95% CI, 6% to 19%). When vancomycin powder was used in addition to a drain, deep SSI rates were reduced by 10% (95% CI, 2% to 17%, p=0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that closed suction drains after operative fixation of high-risk tibia fractures may not be associated with deep infection in general. However, a secondary analysis raises the possibility that drains are associated with reduced deep infection rates if topical vancomycin powder is used but associated with increased infection rates if vancomycin powder is not used.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000002933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the association between closed suction drainage and postoperative infection in patients with tibial plateau or pilon fractures. Secondarily, this study assessed if intrawound vancomycin powder modified the association of closed surgical drains with infection.

Methods: Design: Secondary analysis of the Effect of Intrawound Vancomycin Powder in Operatively Treated High-risk Tibia Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial (VANCO) trial.

Setting: 36 academic trauma centers.

Patient selection criteria: All patients with high-risk tibia fractures (OTA/AO classification 41B/C or 43B/C) from the VANCO trial were considered. Closed suction drains were placed based on the treating surgeon's discretion. Patients were randomly assigned to received 1-gram intrawound vancomycin powder in the surgical wound at definitive fixation or the standard infection prevention protocol at each center.Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Deep surgical site infection (SSI) within 6 months. Comparisons were made between patients treated with and without drains. Subgroup analysis also examined the effect of drains in patients with and without intrawound vancomycin powder.

Results: Of the 978 study patients, 197 (20%) were treated with drains. Deep infection rates did not significantly differ between patients with or without surgical drains (8% versus 8%, p=0.88). However, intrawound vancomycin powder significantly modified the association of surgical drains on deep SSI (interaction p=0.048). Specifically, patients with drains but no vancomycin powder had the highest deep infection rate (13%; 95% CI, 6% to 19%). When vancomycin powder was used in addition to a drain, deep SSI rates were reduced by 10% (95% CI, 2% to 17%, p=0.01).

Conclusions: This study suggests that closed suction drains after operative fixation of high-risk tibia fractures may not be associated with deep infection in general. However, a secondary analysis raises the possibility that drains are associated with reduced deep infection rates if topical vancomycin powder is used but associated with increased infection rates if vancomycin powder is not used.

Level of evidence: Level III.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高风险胫骨平台和趾骨骨折手术固定后,引流管是否会导致感染?
目的确定胫骨平台或皮隆骨折患者闭合吸引引流与术后感染之间的关联。其次,本研究还评估了伤口内万古霉素粉是否会改变闭合式手术引流管与感染之间的关系:方法:设计:方法:对 "万古霉素粉对手术治疗高风险胫骨骨折的影响 "进行二次分析:随机临床试验(VANCO):36家学术性创伤中心:所有来自 VANCO 试验的高风险胫骨骨折患者(OTA/AO 分级 41B/C 或 43B/C)均在考虑之列。根据主治医生的判断放置闭合抽吸引流管。患者被随机分配到各中心,在最终固定时在手术伤口内接受1克万古霉素粉末或标准感染预防方案:6个月内的深部手术部位感染(SSI)。对使用和不使用引流管的患者进行比较。亚组分析还考察了引流管对使用和未使用伤口内万古霉素粉的患者的影响:在 978 名研究患者中,197 人(20%)接受了引流管治疗。有无手术引流管的患者深部感染率无明显差异(8% 对 8%,P=0.88)。然而,伤口内万古霉素粉显著改变了手术引流管与深部 SSI 的关系(交互作用 p=0.048)。具体来说,有引流管但未使用万古霉素粉的患者深部感染率最高(13%;95% CI,6% 至 19%)。如果在使用引流管的同时使用万古霉素粉,深部 SSI 感染率降低了 10%(95% CI,2% 至 17%,P=0.01):本研究表明,高风险胫骨骨折手术固定后使用闭合抽吸引流管一般与深部感染无关。然而,一项辅助分析提出了一种可能性,即如果局部使用万古霉素粉末,引流管与深部感染率降低有关,但如果不使用万古霉素粉末,引流管与感染率增加有关:证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures? The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1