Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Swallowing Function of Patients With Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Bohan Zhang, Ka Po Wong, Cai Guo, Shu-Cheng Chen, Shuojin Fu, Ruifu Kang, Qian Xiao, Jing Qin
{"title":"Effects of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on the Swallowing Function of Patients With Post-Stroke Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bohan Zhang, Ka Po Wong, Cai Guo, Shu-Cheng Chen, Shuojin Fu, Ruifu Kang, Qian Xiao, Jing Qin","doi":"10.1111/joor.13901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-stroke dysphagia can lead to serious complications and appropriate rehabilitation can significantly improve swallowing function. However, the best rehabilitation method for post-stroke dysphagia patients is not clear at the present stage, so it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis and systematic review of different interventions for dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness and ranking of different interventions for improving swallowing function, and feeding and daily function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched from the date of inception to September 1, 2022. Two investigators independently conducted literature searches, selected randomized controlled trials on dysphagia interventions, and assessed study quality. Network meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 studies involving 1,341 patients were included. According to the ranking probabilities, acupuncture was rated as the most effective of all interventions to enhance patients' swallowing function (surface under cumulative ranking curve values [SUCRCV]: 99.0%, standardized mean difference [SMD]: -2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.38 to -1.43), followed by the chin tuck against resistance exercise (CTAR, SUCRA: 89.9%, SMD: -1.83, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.97). Among all the interventions, acupuncture was the most effective for feeding and daily function (SUCRCV: 88.4%, SMD: -1.62, 95% CI: -2.94 to -0.30).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results showed that acupuncture was the most effective in the rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke dysphagia, followed by CTAR. Considering that CTAR is a low-cost and highly feasible intervention, we suggest that CTAR should be selected as a rehabilitation measure for patients with post-stroke dysphagia to improve their swallowing function.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13901","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Post-stroke dysphagia can lead to serious complications and appropriate rehabilitation can significantly improve swallowing function. However, the best rehabilitation method for post-stroke dysphagia patients is not clear at the present stage, so it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive network meta-analysis and systematic review of different interventions for dysphagia.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness and ranking of different interventions for improving swallowing function, and feeding and daily function in patients with post-stroke dysphagia.
Methods: Seven databases were searched from the date of inception to September 1, 2022. Two investigators independently conducted literature searches, selected randomized controlled trials on dysphagia interventions, and assessed study quality. Network meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata software.
Results: A total of 33 studies involving 1,341 patients were included. According to the ranking probabilities, acupuncture was rated as the most effective of all interventions to enhance patients' swallowing function (surface under cumulative ranking curve values [SUCRCV]: 99.0%, standardized mean difference [SMD]: -2.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.38 to -1.43), followed by the chin tuck against resistance exercise (CTAR, SUCRA: 89.9%, SMD: -1.83, 95% CI: -2.69 to -0.97). Among all the interventions, acupuncture was the most effective for feeding and daily function (SUCRCV: 88.4%, SMD: -1.62, 95% CI: -2.94 to -0.30).
Conclusions: The results showed that acupuncture was the most effective in the rehabilitation of patients with post-stroke dysphagia, followed by CTAR. Considering that CTAR is a low-cost and highly feasible intervention, we suggest that CTAR should be selected as a rehabilitation measure for patients with post-stroke dysphagia to improve their swallowing function.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function.
Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology.
The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
