Experimental study of fractures of the posterior pelvic ring C1.1 using LC-II screws and internal fixation by plate.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05229-2
Yu Liu, Xukai Wang, Bin Tian, Hong Yao, Guangyao Liu
{"title":"Experimental study of fractures of the posterior pelvic ring C1.1 using LC-II screws and internal fixation by plate.","authors":"Yu Liu, Xukai Wang, Bin Tian, Hong Yao, Guangyao Liu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05229-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To compare the biomechanical outcomes of C1.1 posterior pelvic ring fractures treated with different numbers of LC-II screws and plate internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine adult preserved pelvic specimens were used. After being measured by bone densitometry, the specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 3 pelvic specimens each. The C1.1 pelvic fractures were generated by iliac osteotomies and anterior pelvic ring osteotomies. The fractures were fixed and randomly divided into three groups: (1) one LC-II screw, (2) two LC-II screws, and (3) two reconstruction plates. The anterior pelvic rings were all fixed with pubic branch screws. A biomechanical testing machine loaded all specimens vertically, recording the displacement and ultimate load of the specimens to quantify the stiffness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When loads up to 1000 N were applied, the displacement of the iliac bone was close between the one LC-II screw and the two LC-II screw group specimens; (P > 0.05); when loads such as 1000 N, 1200 N and 1400 N were applied, there was no significant difference in displacement between the plate fixation group and the two LC-II screw fixation group (P > 0.05), both of which were superior to the one LC-II screw fixation group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in compressive stiffness between the two LC-II screw fixation groups and the plate fixation group (P > 0.05), and both were superior to the one LC-II screw fixation group (P < 0.05) the ultimate load of both the two LC-II screws and the steel plate is greater than that of one LC-II screw (1.74 times the ultimate load of one LC-II screw for the two LC-II screws and 1.83 times the ultimate load of one LC-II screw for the steel plate).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For posterior pelvic ring fractures of type C1.1, placement of two LC-II screws provides comparable posterior pelvic ring stability compared to reconstructed plates. At loads below 1000 N, one LC-II screw fixation and two LC-II screws were comparable in restoring posterior pelvic ring stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05229-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To compare the biomechanical outcomes of C1.1 posterior pelvic ring fractures treated with different numbers of LC-II screws and plate internal fixation.

Materials and methods: Nine adult preserved pelvic specimens were used. After being measured by bone densitometry, the specimens were randomly divided into 3 groups of 3 pelvic specimens each. The C1.1 pelvic fractures were generated by iliac osteotomies and anterior pelvic ring osteotomies. The fractures were fixed and randomly divided into three groups: (1) one LC-II screw, (2) two LC-II screws, and (3) two reconstruction plates. The anterior pelvic rings were all fixed with pubic branch screws. A biomechanical testing machine loaded all specimens vertically, recording the displacement and ultimate load of the specimens to quantify the stiffness.

Results: When loads up to 1000 N were applied, the displacement of the iliac bone was close between the one LC-II screw and the two LC-II screw group specimens; (P > 0.05); when loads such as 1000 N, 1200 N and 1400 N were applied, there was no significant difference in displacement between the plate fixation group and the two LC-II screw fixation group (P > 0.05), both of which were superior to the one LC-II screw fixation group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in compressive stiffness between the two LC-II screw fixation groups and the plate fixation group (P > 0.05), and both were superior to the one LC-II screw fixation group (P < 0.05) the ultimate load of both the two LC-II screws and the steel plate is greater than that of one LC-II screw (1.74 times the ultimate load of one LC-II screw for the two LC-II screws and 1.83 times the ultimate load of one LC-II screw for the steel plate).

Conclusion: For posterior pelvic ring fractures of type C1.1, placement of two LC-II screws provides comparable posterior pelvic ring stability compared to reconstructed plates. At loads below 1000 N, one LC-II screw fixation and two LC-II screws were comparable in restoring posterior pelvic ring stability.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用 LC-II 螺钉和钢板内固定骨盆后环 C1.1 骨折的实验研究。
简介:目的:比较采用不同数量的LC-II螺钉和钢板内固定治疗C1.1后骨盆环骨折的生物力学结果:比较使用不同数量的 LC-II 螺钉和钢板内固定治疗 C1.1 后骨盆环骨折的生物力学结果:材料和方法:使用九个保存完好的成人骨盆标本。经骨密度测量后,将标本随机分为 3 组,每组 3 个骨盆标本。C1.1骨盆骨折由髂骨截骨和骨盆前环截骨造成。骨折固定后随机分为三组:(1) 一枚 LC-II 螺钉;(2) 两枚 LC-II 螺钉;(3) 两枚重建钢板。骨盆前环均用耻骨支螺钉固定。生物力学试验机对所有试样进行垂直加载,记录试样的位移和极限载荷,以量化刚度:结果:当施加 1000 N 负荷时,单个 LC-II 螺钉组和两个 LC-II 螺钉组试样的髂骨位移接近;(P > 0.对于 C1.1 型后骨盆环骨折,与重建钢板相比,放置两枚 LC-II 螺钉可提供相当的后骨盆环稳定性。当载荷低于 1000 N 时,一颗 LC-II 螺钉固定和两颗 LC-II 螺钉固定在恢复骨盆后环稳定性方面具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of surgical invasiveness and hidden blood loss between unilateral double portal endoscopic lumbar disc extraction and percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Effect of the orthogeriatric co-management on older hip fracture patients with multimorbidity: a post-hoc exploratory subgroup analysis of a non-randomised controlled trial. Pilot study on the in-vitro effect of radiation therapy on bending stiffness of intramedullary photodynamic implants. Comparison of three sacral screw internal fixation techniques in the treatment of L4-S1 lumbar degenerative disease with osteoporosis: a retrospective observational study. Correction: CRISPR activation identifies a novel miR-2861 binding site that facilitates the osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1