Non-inferiority of Cataract Surgery in a Stand-Alone Unidirectional Airflow System Versus in a Conventional Operating Room: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of refractive surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.3928/1081597X-20241009-01
Sarah Partouche, Filippo Fabro, Artus Arnaud, Lucile Senicourt, Damien Gatinel, Christophe Panthier
{"title":"Non-inferiority of Cataract Surgery in a Stand-Alone Unidirectional Airflow System Versus in a Conventional Operating Room: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Sarah Partouche, Filippo Fabro, Artus Arnaud, Lucile Senicourt, Damien Gatinel, Christophe Panthier","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20241009-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To demonstrate the non-inferiority of a stand-alone unidirectional airflow system, the SurgiCube (Surgi-Cube International BV), for cataract surgery compared to a conventional operating theater (OT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective and comparative cross-sectional study conducted at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. All patients who underwent cataract surgery using the SurgiCube between February 2020 and February 2023 were included and compared to a separate group of patients with cataract surgery performed in a conventional OT and under topical anesthesia during the same period. Patients with less than 1 month of follow-up after surgery were excluded. We collected relevant information from the patient's medical records. Main outcome measures, incidence of endophthalmitis, intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence, 1-month logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and intraocular pressure, and operating times were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,901 eyes in the SurgiCube group were compared to 5,474 eyes in the OT group. The occurrence of endophthalmitis was 0.05% (n = 1) in the SurgiCube group versus 0.07% (n = 4) in the OT group (<i>P</i> = 1.00; odds ratio = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.01 to 7.28]). The percentage of procedures with at least one perioperative complication was 2.6% in the SurgiCube group and 2.7% in the OT group (<i>P</i> = .87; odds ratio = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.68 to 1.34]). The percentage of procedures with a postoperative complication was 6.31% in the SurgiCube group and 6.6% in the OT group (<i>P</i> = .59; odds ratio = 0.94 [95% CI = 0.75 to 1.17]. Average visual acuity at 30 days was 0.04 logMAR in the SurgiCube group and 0.07 logMAR in the OT group (<i>P</i> = .62). The average operating times were 16.8 and 19.7 minutes for the SurgiCube and OT groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). The average occupation room times were 26.2 and 32.3 minutes for the SurgiCube and OT groups, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cataract surgery in the SurgiCube seems to be non-inferior to cataract surgery in a conventional OT. <b>[<i>J Refract Surg</i>. 2024;40(11):e884-e891.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"40 11","pages":"e884-e891"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20241009-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate the non-inferiority of a stand-alone unidirectional airflow system, the SurgiCube (Surgi-Cube International BV), for cataract surgery compared to a conventional operating theater (OT).

Methods: This was a retrospective and comparative cross-sectional study conducted at the Rothschild Foundation, Paris, France. All patients who underwent cataract surgery using the SurgiCube between February 2020 and February 2023 were included and compared to a separate group of patients with cataract surgery performed in a conventional OT and under topical anesthesia during the same period. Patients with less than 1 month of follow-up after surgery were excluded. We collected relevant information from the patient's medical records. Main outcome measures, incidence of endophthalmitis, intraoperative and postoperative complication incidence, 1-month logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity and intraocular pressure, and operating times were analyzed.

Results: A total of 1,901 eyes in the SurgiCube group were compared to 5,474 eyes in the OT group. The occurrence of endophthalmitis was 0.05% (n = 1) in the SurgiCube group versus 0.07% (n = 4) in the OT group (P = 1.00; odds ratio = 0.72 [95% CI = 0.01 to 7.28]). The percentage of procedures with at least one perioperative complication was 2.6% in the SurgiCube group and 2.7% in the OT group (P = .87; odds ratio = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.68 to 1.34]). The percentage of procedures with a postoperative complication was 6.31% in the SurgiCube group and 6.6% in the OT group (P = .59; odds ratio = 0.94 [95% CI = 0.75 to 1.17]. Average visual acuity at 30 days was 0.04 logMAR in the SurgiCube group and 0.07 logMAR in the OT group (P = .62). The average operating times were 16.8 and 19.7 minutes for the SurgiCube and OT groups, respectively (P < .001). The average occupation room times were 26.2 and 32.3 minutes for the SurgiCube and OT groups, respectively (P < .001).

Conclusions: Cataract surgery in the SurgiCube seems to be non-inferior to cataract surgery in a conventional OT. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e884-e891.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立单向气流系统与传统手术室中白内障手术的非劣效性:回顾性研究。
目的:证明在白内障手术中使用独立的单向气流系统 SurgiCube(Surgi-Cube International BV)与传统手术室(OT)相比没有劣势:这是一项在法国巴黎罗斯柴尔德基金会进行的回顾性横断面比较研究。研究纳入了 2020 年 2 月至 2023 年 2 月期间使用 SurgiCube 进行白内障手术的所有患者,并与同期在传统手术室和局部麻醉下进行白内障手术的另一组患者进行了比较。手术后随访不足 1 个月的患者被排除在外。我们从患者的病历中收集了相关信息。我们分析了主要结果指标、眼底病发生率、术中和术后并发症发生率、1个月最小分辨角(logMAR)视力和眼压对数以及手术时间:结果:SurgiCube 组共有 1,901 只眼睛,而 OT 组有 5,474 只眼睛。SurgiCube组眼底炎发生率为0.05%(n = 1),而OT组为0.07%(n = 4)(P = 1.00;几率比=0.72 [95% CI = 0.01至7.28])。SurgiCube组至少出现一种围手术期并发症的手术比例为2.6%,OT组为2.7%(P = 0.87;几率比 = 0.96 [95% CI = 0.68 至 1.34])。术后出现并发症的手术比例,SurgiCube 组为 6.31%,OT 组为 6.6%(P = .59;几率比 = 0.94 [95% CI = 0.75 至 1.17])。手术立方组 30 天后的平均视力为 0.04 logMAR,OT 组为 0.07 logMAR(P = 0.62)。SurgiCube组和OT组的平均手术时间分别为16.8分钟和19.7分钟(P < .001)。手术立方组和手术室组的平均手术时间分别为 26.2 分钟和 32.3 分钟(P < .001):结论:在 SurgiCube 中进行白内障手术似乎并不比在传统 OT 中进行白内障手术效果差。[J Refract Surg. 2024;40(11):e884-e891.]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Visual and Safety Outcomes of Refractive Correction Procedures Following Lens Removal for Residual Refractive Error: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2024 Reviewers. A Nomogram to Improve the Predictability of High Myopic Astigmatism in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery. Application of the Taylor Diagram in Evaluating the Performance of IOL Formulas. Clarification of Femtosecond Laser Terminology: Energy, Fluence, Dose.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1