Evaluating catatonia care in the psychiatric emergency room: A retrospective study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2024-11-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.015
Samuel Reinfeld
{"title":"Evaluating catatonia care in the psychiatric emergency room: A retrospective study","authors":"Samuel Reinfeld","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Catatonia, characterized by motor, affective, and speech disturbances, is a prevalent yet frequently misdiagnosed syndrome in the psychiatric domain, with reported prevalence ranging from 5% to 18%. This study aimed to ascertain the incidence of catatonia diagnoses and the quality of care provided within the psychiatric emergency room (ER), while also evaluating psychiatrists' general awareness of the syndrome through a survey.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective analysis of psychiatric ER records spanning June 18th to August 20th, 2022, was conducted to assess catatonia diagnosis frequency and treatment approaches. A Google Survey was distributed to full-time psychiatrists in the ER, querying their knowledge about catatonia prevalence, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis of 1118 patient records revealed a catatonia diagnosis rate of 0.36% (four cases) in the psychiatric ER. Remarkably, 75% of diagnosed patients were assessed by a single psychiatrist among nine available. Survey responses from all nine ER psychiatrists highlighted that 44% considered encountering catatonia as infrequent, while 33% regarded it as generally rare. Furthermore, 33% expressed willingness to employ potent antipsychotic interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study revealed a markedly low catatonia detection rate in the psychiatric ER, coupled with inconsistent treatment approaches. Survey findings reflected a considerable proportion of psychiatrists holding outdated perceptions of catatonia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 439-442"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624006356","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Catatonia, characterized by motor, affective, and speech disturbances, is a prevalent yet frequently misdiagnosed syndrome in the psychiatric domain, with reported prevalence ranging from 5% to 18%. This study aimed to ascertain the incidence of catatonia diagnoses and the quality of care provided within the psychiatric emergency room (ER), while also evaluating psychiatrists' general awareness of the syndrome through a survey.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of psychiatric ER records spanning June 18th to August 20th, 2022, was conducted to assess catatonia diagnosis frequency and treatment approaches. A Google Survey was distributed to full-time psychiatrists in the ER, querying their knowledge about catatonia prevalence, diagnostic modalities, and treatment strategies.

Results

Analysis of 1118 patient records revealed a catatonia diagnosis rate of 0.36% (four cases) in the psychiatric ER. Remarkably, 75% of diagnosed patients were assessed by a single psychiatrist among nine available. Survey responses from all nine ER psychiatrists highlighted that 44% considered encountering catatonia as infrequent, while 33% regarded it as generally rare. Furthermore, 33% expressed willingness to employ potent antipsychotic interventions.

Conclusion

The study revealed a markedly low catatonia detection rate in the psychiatric ER, coupled with inconsistent treatment approaches. Survey findings reflected a considerable proportion of psychiatrists holding outdated perceptions of catatonia.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估精神科急诊室的紧张症护理:回顾性研究。
背景:以运动、情感和语言障碍为特征的紧张症是精神科领域一种普遍存在但又经常被误诊的综合征,据报道发病率在 5% 到 18% 之间。本研究旨在确定精神科急诊室(ER)中紧张症诊断的发生率和护理质量,同时通过调查评估精神科医生对该综合征的总体认识:方法:我们对 2022 年 6 月 18 日至 8 月 20 日期间的精神科急诊室记录进行了回顾性分析,以评估紧张症的诊断频率和治疗方法。向急诊室的全职精神科医生发放了一份谷歌调查问卷,询问他们对紧张症的发病率、诊断方式和治疗策略的了解情况:结果:对 1118 份病历的分析显示,精神科急诊室的紧张症诊断率为 0.36%(4 例)。值得注意的是,75%的确诊患者是由九位精神科医生中的一位进行评估的。九名急诊室精神科医生的调查反馈显示,44%的人认为紧张症并不常见,33%的人认为一般很少见。此外,33%的人表示愿意采用强效抗精神病干预措施:研究显示,精神科急诊室的紧张症检出率明显偏低,而且治疗方法也不一致。调查结果反映出相当一部分精神科医生对紧张症持有过时的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Increased risk of suicide reattempt according to the type of brief contact interventions in the VigilanS program: The critical role of PTSD and anxiety disorders. The efficacy of InterRhythmic care for depression: A randomized control trial. The relationship between sleep and circadian patterns with risk for suicide in bipolar disorder varies by subtype. The mediating role of depression and disability in the association between widowhood and cognitive function among elderly Chinese individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1