Unilateral and bilateral theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Follow up on a naturalistic observation study

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Journal of psychiatric research Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.10.031
Mariam Elnazali , Ashan Veerakumar , Mervin Blair , Emily L. Pearce , Noah Kim , Sreya Sebastian , Jonathan B. Santo , Yuri E. Rybak , Amer M. Burhan
{"title":"Unilateral and bilateral theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: Follow up on a naturalistic observation study","authors":"Mariam Elnazali ,&nbsp;Ashan Veerakumar ,&nbsp;Mervin Blair ,&nbsp;Emily L. Pearce ,&nbsp;Noah Kim ,&nbsp;Sreya Sebastian ,&nbsp;Jonathan B. Santo ,&nbsp;Yuri E. Rybak ,&nbsp;Amer M. Burhan","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.10.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a novel and faster modality of transcranial magnetic stimulation, which is showing promise as a treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treatment. Though TBS can be applied unilaterally or bilaterally, few studies have compared the effectiveness of both approaches in a naturalistic clinical sample. In this retrospective chart review, we aimed to: (1) replicate previous bilateral sequential TBS effectiveness in a larger cohort of patients at a single centre, (2) present treatment outcome data between unilateral and bilateral TBS approaches, (3) investigate baseline factors associated with our observed outcomes, and (4) examine the sustainability of response, with follow-up data up to 6 months from patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included 161 patients who received TBS (unilateral: n = 64 (40%), 45.55 ± 14.25 years old, 55% females; bilateral: n = 97 (60%), 47.67 ± 15.11 years old, 58% females).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Firstly, we observed 47% response and 34% remission in the bilateral group, replicating findings from a smaller naturalistic study from our group; patients receiving unilateral TBS displayed 36% response and 26% remission, with no significant differences found between unilateral and bilateral TBS in remission and response rates. Secondly, bilaterally stimulated patients needed fewer treatments than those stimulated unilaterally (27 vs 29 on average respectively, <em>t</em> [159] = 3.31, <em>p</em> = .001), and had significantly lower anxiety symptoms post treatment (GAD-7) relative to patients receiving unilateral stimulation, <em>F</em> (1,148) = 3.95, <em>p</em> = .049. Thirdly, no baseline factors were found to predict treatment outcomes. Lastly, after six months, 69% of patients who met the response criteria did not require additional treatment or a change in medication.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings support the efficacy and tolerability of TBS in TRD and indicate that bilateral TBS may have a superior anxiolytic effect and offer a slightly faster time to response.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychiatric research","volume":"180 ","pages":"Pages 387-393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychiatric research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022395624006162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is a novel and faster modality of transcranial magnetic stimulation, which is showing promise as a treatment-resistant depression (TRD) treatment. Though TBS can be applied unilaterally or bilaterally, few studies have compared the effectiveness of both approaches in a naturalistic clinical sample. In this retrospective chart review, we aimed to: (1) replicate previous bilateral sequential TBS effectiveness in a larger cohort of patients at a single centre, (2) present treatment outcome data between unilateral and bilateral TBS approaches, (3) investigate baseline factors associated with our observed outcomes, and (4) examine the sustainability of response, with follow-up data up to 6 months from patients.

Methods

We included 161 patients who received TBS (unilateral: n = 64 (40%), 45.55 ± 14.25 years old, 55% females; bilateral: n = 97 (60%), 47.67 ± 15.11 years old, 58% females).

Results

Firstly, we observed 47% response and 34% remission in the bilateral group, replicating findings from a smaller naturalistic study from our group; patients receiving unilateral TBS displayed 36% response and 26% remission, with no significant differences found between unilateral and bilateral TBS in remission and response rates. Secondly, bilaterally stimulated patients needed fewer treatments than those stimulated unilaterally (27 vs 29 on average respectively, t [159] = 3.31, p = .001), and had significantly lower anxiety symptoms post treatment (GAD-7) relative to patients receiving unilateral stimulation, F (1,148) = 3.95, p = .049. Thirdly, no baseline factors were found to predict treatment outcomes. Lastly, after six months, 69% of patients who met the response criteria did not require additional treatment or a change in medication.

Conclusions

Our findings support the efficacy and tolerability of TBS in TRD and indicate that bilateral TBS may have a superior anxiolytic effect and offer a slightly faster time to response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单侧和双侧θ脉冲刺激治疗耐药抑郁症:自然观察研究的后续研究。
目的:Theta 脉冲串刺激(TBS)是一种新颖、快速的经颅磁刺激方式,在治疗耐药抑郁症(TRD)方面前景看好。虽然 TBS 可单侧或双侧使用,但很少有研究在自然临床样本中比较这两种方法的有效性。在这项回顾性病历审查中,我们旨在(1)在一个中心的更大患者群中复制之前的双侧顺序 TBS 的有效性;(2)提供单侧和双侧 TBS 方法的治疗结果数据;(3)调查与我们观察到的结果相关的基线因素;以及(4)利用患者长达 6 个月的随访数据检查反应的持续性:我们纳入了 161 名接受 TBS 治疗的患者(单侧:n = 64(40%),45.55 ± 14.25 岁,55% 为女性;双侧:n = 97(60%),47.67 ± 15.11 岁,58% 为女性):首先,我们观察到双侧组的反应率为 47%,缓解率为 34%,这与我们小组的一项规模较小的自然研究结果相同;接受单侧 TBS 的患者反应率为 36%,缓解率为 26%,单侧和双侧 TBS 在缓解率和反应率方面没有显著差异。其次,与单侧刺激患者相比,双侧刺激患者所需的治疗次数更少(分别为平均 27 次和 29 次,t [159] = 3.31,p = .001),治疗后的焦虑症状(GAD-7)也明显低于单侧刺激患者,F (1,148) = 3.95,p = .049。第三,没有发现任何基线因素可以预测治疗结果。最后,6 个月后,69% 符合反应标准的患者不需要额外治疗或更换药物:我们的研究结果支持TBS对TRD的疗效和耐受性,并表明双侧TBS可能具有更优越的抗焦虑效果,且反应时间稍快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of psychiatric research
Journal of psychiatric research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
622
审稿时长
130 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1961 to report on the latest work in psychiatry and cognate disciplines, the Journal of Psychiatric Research is dedicated to innovative and timely studies of four important areas of research: (1) clinical studies of all disciplines relating to psychiatric illness, as well as normal human behaviour, including biochemical, physiological, genetic, environmental, social, psychological and epidemiological factors; (2) basic studies pertaining to psychiatry in such fields as neuropsychopharmacology, neuroendocrinology, electrophysiology, genetics, experimental psychology and epidemiology; (3) the growing application of clinical laboratory techniques in psychiatry, including imagery and spectroscopy of the brain, molecular biology and computer sciences;
期刊最新文献
The mediating role of depression and disability in the association between widowhood and cognitive function among elderly Chinese individuals. Non-attendance in randomized remote mental health clinical trial during the COVID-19 pandemic Clinical and lifestyle predictors of loneliness: A two-year longitudinal study Parental mental disorders and ages of onset of severe mental disorders in offspring: A nationwide family-link study Corrigendum to “German translation and psychometric evaluation of the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS-GER) in a general population sample and in patients with acute myocardial infarction” [J. Psychiat. Res. 178 (2024) 201–209]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1