Cultivar-dependent differences in plant bud microbiome and functional gene pathways in woody plants commonly used in urban green space.

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Letters in Applied Microbiology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1093/lambio/ovae110
Marja I Roslund, Polina Galitskaya, Mika Saarenpää, Aki Sinkkonen
{"title":"Cultivar-dependent differences in plant bud microbiome and functional gene pathways in woody plants commonly used in urban green space.","authors":"Marja I Roslund, Polina Galitskaya, Mika Saarenpää, Aki Sinkkonen","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovae110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plant richness and microbiota have been associated with plant health; hardly any studies have investigated how plant taxa differs in microbiota in the context of human health. We investigated the microbial differences in buds of 83 woody plant taxa used in urban green spaces in hemiboreal climate, using 16S rRNA and whole metagenome shotgun sequencing. Bud microbial community was the richest in Cotoneaster Nanshan and C. integerrimus, and Malus domestica cultivars 'Sandra' and 'Lobo' and poorest in Ribes glandulosum. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing of two M. domestica and four Ribes varieties confirmed differences in taxa in bud microbiota and indicated higher siderophore synthesis in Malus. Microbial richness, including bacteria, archaea and viruses, and functional richness of gene pathways was higher in Malus compared to Ribes. The ten most abundant amplicon sequence units, often referred as species, belonged to the phylum Proteobacteria. The differences between plant taxa were evident in classes Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, known for potential human health-benefits. Since environmental microbiota contributes to human microbiota and immunoregulation, horticultural cultivars hosting rich microbiota may have human health benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of microbially-oriented plant selection in optimizing human microbiota and planetary health.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant richness and microbiota have been associated with plant health; hardly any studies have investigated how plant taxa differs in microbiota in the context of human health. We investigated the microbial differences in buds of 83 woody plant taxa used in urban green spaces in hemiboreal climate, using 16S rRNA and whole metagenome shotgun sequencing. Bud microbial community was the richest in Cotoneaster Nanshan and C. integerrimus, and Malus domestica cultivars 'Sandra' and 'Lobo' and poorest in Ribes glandulosum. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing of two M. domestica and four Ribes varieties confirmed differences in taxa in bud microbiota and indicated higher siderophore synthesis in Malus. Microbial richness, including bacteria, archaea and viruses, and functional richness of gene pathways was higher in Malus compared to Ribes. The ten most abundant amplicon sequence units, often referred as species, belonged to the phylum Proteobacteria. The differences between plant taxa were evident in classes Alpha- and Gammaproteobacteria, known for potential human health-benefits. Since environmental microbiota contributes to human microbiota and immunoregulation, horticultural cultivars hosting rich microbiota may have human health benefits. Further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of microbially-oriented plant selection in optimizing human microbiota and planetary health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市绿地常用木本植物植物芽微生物组和功能基因通路的栽培品种依赖性差异。
植物丰富度和微生物群与植物健康有关,但几乎没有研究调查过植物分类群在人类健康方面的微生物群差异。我们利用 16S rRNA 和全元基因组枪式测序技术,研究了半寒带气候条件下城市绿地中 83 种木本植物芽中微生物群落的差异。在栒子属南山和栒子属、马蔺栽培品种 "Sandra "和 "Lobo "中,芽的微生物群落最为丰富,而在Ribes glandulosum中则最为贫乏。对两个 M. domestica 和四个 Ribes 品种进行的元基因组枪式测序证实了花蕾微生物群中类群的差异,并表明 Malus 的苷元合成较高。与 Ribes 相比,Malus 的微生物丰富度(包括细菌、古生菌和病毒)和基因通路的功能丰富度更高。十个最丰富的扩增子序列单位(通常称为物种)属于蛋白细菌门。植物类群之间的差异在α-和γ-蛋白细菌类中很明显,这两类细菌以潜在的人类健康益处而闻名。由于环境微生物群有助于人类微生物群和免疫调节,因此园艺栽培品种中富含的微生物群可能对人类健康有益。要确认以微生物为导向的植物选择在优化人类微生物群和地球健康方面的有效性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
期刊最新文献
Bacterial composition and cultural dynamics of microgreens-associated microbiota during selective enrichment for Listeria monocytogenes. Cultivar-dependent differences in plant bud microbiome and functional gene pathways in woody plants commonly used in urban green space. Impact of High Hydrostatic Pressure and UV-C Radiation on Total Aerobic Bacteria in Minas Frescal Cheese. Impact of Probiotic Bacillus sp. Dietary Supplementation on Pancreatic and Intestinal Activities in Seabream Sparus aurata. Biochemical characterization of HcrF from Limosilactobacillus fermentum, a NADH-dependent 2-ene reductase with activity on hydroxycinnamic acids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1