Reducing the Distance Between Anode and Cathode to Make Handheld Nerve Stimulators More Selective in Nerve Fascicle Selection: Report of Two Cases

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Microsurgery Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI:10.1002/micr.31263
Lucas Marina, Elisa Sanz, Lara Cristobal, Andres A. Maldonado
{"title":"Reducing the Distance Between Anode and Cathode to Make Handheld Nerve Stimulators More Selective in Nerve Fascicle Selection: Report of Two Cases","authors":"Lucas Marina,&nbsp;Elisa Sanz,&nbsp;Lara Cristobal,&nbsp;Andres A. Maldonado","doi":"10.1002/micr.31263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Precise nerve fascicle identification is important in certain peripheral nerve procedures. Although we believe bipolar nerve stimulation with intraoperative neuromonitoring is a superior method, many rely on clinical response evoked by handheld monopolar nerve stimulators. We present a modification in the use of the latter for a more precise fascicle stimulation. A 55-year-old man with a right high brachial plexus injury and a 47-year-old woman with a left median nerve schwannoma were scheduled for exploration and ulnar-to-musculocutaneous nerve transfer, and for surgical excision respectively. Intraoperatively, we used a disposable handheld monopolar nerve stimulator in an unorthodox way, placing the anode right next to the cathode (both touching the same nerve fascicle). In the first case, a fascicle that showed flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and intrinsic hand muscle contraction with standard stimulation (anode placed on patient's skin), showed only FCU activation with our modified method, and was chosen as donor. A BMC grade M4 elbow flexion was achieved 9 months after surgery. In the second case, safe schwannoma excision was performed after our modified stimulation technique caused thenar muscle activation in a single, unaffected fascicle, while standard monopolar stimulation showed activation in several fascicles. No unexpected motor/sensory deficits were noted during follow-up. This report shows an easy modification in the use of handheld nerve stimulators that improves selectiveness when looking for nerve fascicles.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18600,"journal":{"name":"Microsurgery","volume":"44 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/micr.31263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise nerve fascicle identification is important in certain peripheral nerve procedures. Although we believe bipolar nerve stimulation with intraoperative neuromonitoring is a superior method, many rely on clinical response evoked by handheld monopolar nerve stimulators. We present a modification in the use of the latter for a more precise fascicle stimulation. A 55-year-old man with a right high brachial plexus injury and a 47-year-old woman with a left median nerve schwannoma were scheduled for exploration and ulnar-to-musculocutaneous nerve transfer, and for surgical excision respectively. Intraoperatively, we used a disposable handheld monopolar nerve stimulator in an unorthodox way, placing the anode right next to the cathode (both touching the same nerve fascicle). In the first case, a fascicle that showed flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) and intrinsic hand muscle contraction with standard stimulation (anode placed on patient's skin), showed only FCU activation with our modified method, and was chosen as donor. A BMC grade M4 elbow flexion was achieved 9 months after surgery. In the second case, safe schwannoma excision was performed after our modified stimulation technique caused thenar muscle activation in a single, unaffected fascicle, while standard monopolar stimulation showed activation in several fascicles. No unexpected motor/sensory deficits were noted during follow-up. This report shows an easy modification in the use of handheld nerve stimulators that improves selectiveness when looking for nerve fascicles.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
缩小阳极和阴极之间的距离,使手持式神经刺激器在选择神经束时更具选择性:两个病例的报告。
在某些周围神经手术中,精确的神经束识别非常重要。尽管我们认为术中神经监测的双极神经刺激是一种更优越的方法,但许多人还是依赖于手持式单极神经刺激器诱发的临床反应。我们介绍了使用单极神经刺激器进行更精确筋束刺激的改良方法。一名 55 岁的男子患有右侧臂丛神经高位损伤,一名 47 岁的妇女患有左侧正中神经分裂瘤,他们分别被安排进行探查、尺神经至肌皮神经转移和手术切除。术中,我们以一种非正统的方式使用了一次性手持单极神经刺激器,将阳极放在阴极旁边(两者都触及同一神经束)。在第一个病例中,在标准刺激(阳极置于患者皮肤上)下显示尺侧屈肌(FCU)和手部固有肌收缩的神经束,在我们的改良方法下仅显示 FCU 激活,因此被选为供体。术后 9 个月,患者的肘关节屈曲度达到了 BMC M4 级。在第二个病例中,我们的改良刺激技术只激活了一条未受影响的腓肠肌束,而标准单极刺激则激活了多条腓肠肌束,因此患者安全地进行了裂孔瘤切除术。随访期间未发现意外的运动/感觉障碍。本报告展示了使用手持式神经刺激器的简易改良方法,提高了寻找神经束时的选择性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microsurgery
Microsurgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
19.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Microsurgery is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions concerning surgery under microscopic magnification. Microsurgery publishes clinical studies, research papers, invited articles, relevant reviews, and other scholarly works from all related fields including orthopaedic surgery, otolaryngology, pediatric surgery, plastic surgery, urology, and vascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Effects of Preoperative Hemoglobin on Microsurgical Reconstruction and Perioperative Blood Transfusion Requirement: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Literature Pain Remission Following Delayed Targeted Muscle Reinnervation in Amputees The Impact of Depression and Anxiety Comorbidities on Acute Postoperative Pain After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Double Medial Circumflex Femoral Artery Perforator Flaps for Unilateral Breast Reconstruction—A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1