Assessing and tailoring predictive equations of VO2max for women with multiple sclerosis with mild to moderate disability

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Multiple sclerosis and related disorders Pub Date : 2024-11-02 DOI:10.1016/j.msard.2024.106154
Marco Morrone , Anna Boi , Lucia Ventura , Gianluca Martinez , Elena Aiello , Franca Deriu , Andrea Manca
{"title":"Assessing and tailoring predictive equations of VO2max for women with multiple sclerosis with mild to moderate disability","authors":"Marco Morrone ,&nbsp;Anna Boi ,&nbsp;Lucia Ventura ,&nbsp;Gianluca Martinez ,&nbsp;Elena Aiello ,&nbsp;Franca Deriu ,&nbsp;Andrea Manca","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Established equations to predict peak oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>max) in healthy subjects are not directly applicable to patient populations, including people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). PwMS, who commonly exhibit impaired cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular function, often require tailored predictive models. This study aimed at (1) testing the validity, reliability, and accuracy of four widely used formulae, developed in healthy populations, to estimate VO<sub>2</sub>max in mildly to moderately disabled women with MS, and (2) develop adjusted formulae tailored on MS features.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Fifty-one mildly to moderately disabled women (mean age 46, median EDSS 3.5) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) underwent incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using cycle ergometry. Gas exchanges were analyzed by open-circuit spirometry. Four commonly employed predictive equations (ACSM, Storer's, Uth's, and Myers’) were tested for reliability and accuracy against measured VO<sub>2</sub>max. Regressions were performed to identify significant VO<sub>2</sub>max predictors and to introduce adjustments to develop gender-specific equations aimed at estimating cardiorespiratory fitness with varying degrees of exercise involvement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ACSM and Storer's equations underestimated VO<sub>2</sub>max (-6.09 %, <em>Z</em> = -3.22, <em>p</em> = 0.001; and -21.74 %, <em>Z</em> = -5.02, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively) whereas Uth's and Myers’ equations overestimated it (+20.19 %, <em>Z</em> = -5.92, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; and +19.31 %, <em>Z</em> = -6.19, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively). Regressions for adjusted equations revealed work rate/bodyweight (WR/BW) (β = 0.867, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) for ACSM adjusted; age (β = -0.275, <em>p</em> = 0.004), BW (β = -0.658, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and peak Watts (β = 0.485, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) for Storer's adjusted; heart rate ratio (β = 0.512, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) for Uth's adjusted, and age (β = -0.492, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), BW (β = -0.483, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and EDSS (β = -0.211, <em>p</em> = 0.046) for Myers’ adjusted as predictors of VO<sub>2</sub>max.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VO<sub>2</sub>max can be validly estimated in women with MS using established formulae, provided that specific adjustments are introduced to account for their signature functional impairments. The models proposed in this study enable reliable assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness with protocols at different levels of exercise involvement, making them practical for clinical and everyday use. This approach supports a translationally driven bench-to-bedside perspective, allowing for patient VO<sub>2</sub>max assessment in virtually all settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Established equations to predict peak oxygen uptake (VO2max) in healthy subjects are not directly applicable to patient populations, including people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). PwMS, who commonly exhibit impaired cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular function, often require tailored predictive models. This study aimed at (1) testing the validity, reliability, and accuracy of four widely used formulae, developed in healthy populations, to estimate VO2max in mildly to moderately disabled women with MS, and (2) develop adjusted formulae tailored on MS features.

Methods

Fifty-one mildly to moderately disabled women (mean age 46, median EDSS 3.5) with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) underwent incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) using cycle ergometry. Gas exchanges were analyzed by open-circuit spirometry. Four commonly employed predictive equations (ACSM, Storer's, Uth's, and Myers’) were tested for reliability and accuracy against measured VO2max. Regressions were performed to identify significant VO2max predictors and to introduce adjustments to develop gender-specific equations aimed at estimating cardiorespiratory fitness with varying degrees of exercise involvement.

Results

ACSM and Storer's equations underestimated VO2max (-6.09 %, Z = -3.22, p = 0.001; and -21.74 %, Z = -5.02, p < 0.001, respectively) whereas Uth's and Myers’ equations overestimated it (+20.19 %, Z = -5.92, p < 0.001; and +19.31 %, Z = -6.19, p < 0.001, respectively). Regressions for adjusted equations revealed work rate/bodyweight (WR/BW) (β = 0.867, p < 0.001) for ACSM adjusted; age (β = -0.275, p = 0.004), BW (β = -0.658, p < 0.001) and peak Watts (β = 0.485, p < 0.001) for Storer's adjusted; heart rate ratio (β = 0.512, p < 0.001) for Uth's adjusted, and age (β = -0.492, p < 0.001), BW (β = -0.483, p < 0.001) and EDSS (β = -0.211, p = 0.046) for Myers’ adjusted as predictors of VO2max.

Conclusions

VO2max can be validly estimated in women with MS using established formulae, provided that specific adjustments are introduced to account for their signature functional impairments. The models proposed in this study enable reliable assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness with protocols at different levels of exercise involvement, making them practical for clinical and everyday use. This approach supports a translationally driven bench-to-bedside perspective, allowing for patient VO2max assessment in virtually all settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估和定制轻度至中度残疾的女性多发性硬化症患者的 VO2max 预测方程。
背景:用于预测健康人摄氧量峰值(VO2max)的既定公式并不能直接适用于患者群体,包括多发性硬化症患者(PwMS)。多发性硬化症患者通常会表现出心肺功能和神经肌肉功能受损,因此往往需要量身定制的预测模型。本研究旨在(1)测试在健康人群中广泛使用的四种公式的有效性、可靠性和准确性,以估算患有多发性硬化症的轻度至中度残疾妇女的 VO2max;(2)根据多发性硬化症的特征开发调整后的公式:方法:51 名患有复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)的轻度至中度残疾女性(平均年龄 46 岁,EDSS 中位数 3.5)使用循环测力法进行了增量心肺运动测试(CPET)。气体交换通过开路肺活量测定法进行分析。对四种常用的预测方程(ACSM、Storer's、Uth's 和 Myers's)进行了可靠性和准确性测试,并与测量的 VO2max 进行对比。通过回归分析确定了重要的 VO2max 预测因子,并进行了调整,以开发出针对不同性别的方程,用于估算不同运动参与程度的心肺功能:结果:ACSM和Storer方程低估了最大氧饱和度(分别为-6.09 %,Z = -3.22,p = 0.001;和-21.74 %,Z = -5.02,p < 0.001),而Uth和Myers方程则高估了最大氧饱和度(分别为+20.19 %,Z = -5.92,p < 0.001;和+19.31 %,Z = -6.19,p < 0.001)。调整方程的回归结果显示,ACSM 调整方程的工作率/体重(WR/BW)(β = 0.867,p < 0.001);Storer 调整方程的年龄(β = -0.275,p = 0.004)、体重(β = -0.658,p < 0.001)和峰值瓦特(β = 0.485,p < 0.001);心率比(β = 0.512,p < 0.001)(Uth's adjusted);年龄(β = -0.492,p < 0.001)、体重(β = -0.483,p < 0.001)和 EDSS(β = -0.211,p = 0.046)(Myers's adjusted)作为 VO2max 的预测因子:结论:只要根据女性多发性硬化症患者的特征性功能障碍进行特定调整,就可以使用已建立的公式对其 VO2max 进行有效估算。本研究中提出的模型能够在不同运动参与程度的方案中对心肺功能进行可靠的评估,因此适用于临床和日常使用。这种方法支持 "从工作台到床边 "的转化驱动视角,允许在几乎所有环境中对患者进行 VO2max 评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
期刊最新文献
Strength training attenuates neuropathic pain by Preventing dendritic Spine dysgenesis through Suppressing Rac1 and inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis Adaptation, construct validity, and test-retest reliability of the Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire for the Israeli multiple sclerosis population Incorporation of the central vein sign into the McDonald criteria Hypogammaglobulinemia and severe infections in Multiple Sclerosis patients on anti-CD20 agents: A multicentre study Curriculum innovation: Interactive educational workshop improves neurology resident knowledge of multiple sclerosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1