Systematic evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification in patients with a recent clinical fracture visiting the Fracture Liaison Service.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Osteoporosis International Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1007/s00198-024-07288-x
Irma J A de Bruin, Caroline E Wyers, Lisanne Vranken, John T Schousboe, Robert Y van der Velde, Heinrich M J Janzing, Frederik O Lambers Heerspink, Piet P M M Geusens, Joop P van den Bergh
{"title":"Systematic evaluation of abdominal aortic calcification in patients with a recent clinical fracture visiting the Fracture Liaison Service.","authors":"Irma J A de Bruin, Caroline E Wyers, Lisanne Vranken, John T Schousboe, Robert Y van der Velde, Heinrich M J Janzing, Frederik O Lambers Heerspink, Piet P M M Geusens, Joop P van den Bergh","doi":"10.1007/s00198-024-07288-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prevalence of AAC in patients attending a Fracture Liaison Service is 27.6%. Prevalent vertebral fractures were associated with AAC, but not with severe AAC in patients without CVD. Fracture location and BMD were not related to AAC or severe AAC.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), osteoporosis and fractures. We aimed to analyze the prevalence and severity of AAC and to assess whether index fracture location, bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalent VFs are associated with AAC in patients with a recent fracture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional cohort study of patients with a recent clinical fracture (aged 50-90 years) attending the FLS. Patients received a BMD measurement and lateral spine imaging using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. AAC prevalence was assessed using the AAC-24 score and categorized as none, moderate (AAC-24 1-4) and severe (AAC-24 ≥ 5). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the association between risk factors and AAC presence/ severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AAC was present in 478 (27.6%) of 1731 patients of whom 207 (43.3%) had moderate and 271 (56.7%) severe AAC. The presence of AAC was associated with age, BMI, smoking, history of CVD and prevalent grade 2 or 3 VFs, but index fracture location and BMD were not associated with AAC or severe AAC. In patients with AAC (n =  318) without a history of CVD, there was no association between index fracture location and BMD. In that subgroup, severe AAC was not associated with prevalent VFs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In FLS patients, the prevalence of AAC and severe AAC was 27.6% and 15.7%. Index fracture location and BMD were not associated with AAC or severe AAC. Prevalent VFs were associated with AAC, but not with severe AAC in the subgroup of patients without CVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19638,"journal":{"name":"Osteoporosis International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoporosis International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-024-07288-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prevalence of AAC in patients attending a Fracture Liaison Service is 27.6%. Prevalent vertebral fractures were associated with AAC, but not with severe AAC in patients without CVD. Fracture location and BMD were not related to AAC or severe AAC.

Purpose: Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), osteoporosis and fractures. We aimed to analyze the prevalence and severity of AAC and to assess whether index fracture location, bone mineral density (BMD) and prevalent VFs are associated with AAC in patients with a recent fracture.

Methods: Cross-sectional cohort study of patients with a recent clinical fracture (aged 50-90 years) attending the FLS. Patients received a BMD measurement and lateral spine imaging using Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. AAC prevalence was assessed using the AAC-24 score and categorized as none, moderate (AAC-24 1-4) and severe (AAC-24 ≥ 5). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to study the association between risk factors and AAC presence/ severity.

Results: AAC was present in 478 (27.6%) of 1731 patients of whom 207 (43.3%) had moderate and 271 (56.7%) severe AAC. The presence of AAC was associated with age, BMI, smoking, history of CVD and prevalent grade 2 or 3 VFs, but index fracture location and BMD were not associated with AAC or severe AAC. In patients with AAC (n =  318) without a history of CVD, there was no association between index fracture location and BMD. In that subgroup, severe AAC was not associated with prevalent VFs.

Conclusions: In FLS patients, the prevalence of AAC and severe AAC was 27.6% and 15.7%. Index fracture location and BMD were not associated with AAC or severe AAC. Prevalent VFs were associated with AAC, but not with severe AAC in the subgroup of patients without CVD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对近期到骨折联络处就诊的临床骨折患者腹主动脉钙化情况进行系统评估。
在接受骨折联络服务的患者中,AAC 的发病率为 27.6%。在无心血管疾病的患者中,普遍的椎体骨折与AAC有关,但与严重的AAC无关。目的:腹主动脉钙化(AAC)与心血管疾病(CVD)、骨质疏松症和骨折风险增加有关。我们旨在分析腹主动脉钙化的患病率和严重程度,并评估近期骨折患者的骨折位置、骨矿密度(BMD)和流行的VFs是否与腹主动脉钙化有关:方法:横断面队列研究,研究对象为近期在FLS就诊的临床骨折患者(50-90岁)。患者接受了 BMD 测量和使用双能 X 射线吸收仪进行的脊柱侧位成像。AAC患病率使用AAC-24评分进行评估,分为无、中度(AAC-24 1-4)和重度(AAC-24 ≥ 5)。为研究风险因素与 AAC 存在/严重程度之间的关系,进行了多变量逻辑回归分析:结果:1731 名患者中有 478 人(27.6%)存在 AAC,其中 207 人(43.3%)为中度 AAC,271 人(56.7%)为重度 AAC。AAC的存在与年龄、体重指数(BMI)、吸烟、心血管疾病史和流行的2级或3级VF有关,但指数骨折位置和BMD与AAC或重度AAC无关。在无心血管疾病史的AAC患者(n = 318)中,指数骨折位置和BMD之间没有关联。在该亚组中,严重AAC与VFs的流行无关:在FLS患者中,AAC和严重AAC的患病率分别为27.6%和15.7%。指数骨折位置和 BMD 与 AAC 或严重 AAC 无关。在无心血管疾病的患者亚组中,流行性室颤与AAC相关,但与严重AAC无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoporosis International
Osteoporosis International 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: An international multi-disciplinary journal which is a joint initiative between the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, Osteoporosis International provides a forum for the communication and exchange of current ideas concerning the diagnosis, prevention, treatment and management of osteoporosis and other metabolic bone diseases. It publishes: original papers - reporting progress and results in all areas of osteoporosis and its related fields; review articles - reflecting the present state of knowledge in special areas of summarizing limited themes in which discussion has led to clearly defined conclusions; educational articles - giving information on the progress of a topic of particular interest; case reports - of uncommon or interesting presentations of the condition. While focusing on clinical research, the Journal will also accept submissions on more basic aspects of research, where they are considered by the editors to be relevant to the human disease spectrum.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Exposure to air pollution might decrease bone mineral density and increase the prevalence of osteoporosis: A mendelian randomization study. Type 2 diabetes incidence in patients initiating denosumab or alendronate treatment: a primary care cohort study. Real-world efficacy of a teriparatide biosimilar (RGB-10) compared with reference teriparatide on bone mineral density, trabecular bone score, and bone parameters assessed using quantitative ultrasound, 3D-SHAPER® and high-resolution peripheral computer tomography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and very high fracture risk. One versus 2 years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension. Association of proton-density fat fraction with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1