Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers.

IF 1.8 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY OTO Open Pub Date : 2024-11-12 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/oto2.70034
Taylor J Stack, Morgan N McCain, Ezer H Benaim, Theresa A Dickerson, Ibtisam Mohammad, Brent A Senior, Adam J Kimple, Christine DeMason
{"title":"Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers.","authors":"Taylor J Stack, Morgan N McCain, Ezer H Benaim, Theresa A Dickerson, Ibtisam Mohammad, Brent A Senior, Adam J Kimple, Christine DeMason","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nicotine-containing products have historically been tobacco derivatives like cigarettes, cigars, and dip. Recently, tobacco-free nicotine (TFN) products have been marketed as a healthy alternative. TFN pouches are small, discreet, flavored pouches containing nicotine designed to be placed between the gum and lip. This product does not fit a conventional tobacco category, leading to inaccurate reporting. This study aims to investigate discrepancies in physician documentation of TFN pouches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on TFN users.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Health Care System.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Statistical analyses assessed TFN documentation concordance between social history templates and physician notes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 150 patients who used TFN and 841 patients who vaped. Concordance was higher for vape documentation than TFN pouch documentation (55.9%, 470/841 vs 25.3%, 38/150; <i>P</i> < .001). Of those who used TFN, 60% (90/150) were classified as \"Smokeless Tobacco Users\" in the social history; however, 35 were inaccurately classified as chew, and 17 did not specify TFN use. Only 38 specified TFN use; only 25% (38/150) of records demonstrated concordance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Only 25% of records were concordant with physician notes, highlighting the need for a designated place for TFN use within social history templates. Nicotine use history is crucial in the setting of microvascular reconstruction and cosmetic surgeries. Thus, accurate reporting is crucial for future research on the long-term effects of TFN. This study's findings underscore a deficit in current social history templates and the need to recognize TFN pouches as distinct entities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"8 4","pages":"e70034"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nicotine-containing products have historically been tobacco derivatives like cigarettes, cigars, and dip. Recently, tobacco-free nicotine (TFN) products have been marketed as a healthy alternative. TFN pouches are small, discreet, flavored pouches containing nicotine designed to be placed between the gum and lip. This product does not fit a conventional tobacco category, leading to inaccurate reporting. This study aims to investigate discrepancies in physician documentation of TFN pouches.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on TFN users.

Setting: Single Health Care System.

Methods: Statistical analyses assessed TFN documentation concordance between social history templates and physician notes.

Results: There were 150 patients who used TFN and 841 patients who vaped. Concordance was higher for vape documentation than TFN pouch documentation (55.9%, 470/841 vs 25.3%, 38/150; P < .001). Of those who used TFN, 60% (90/150) were classified as "Smokeless Tobacco Users" in the social history; however, 35 were inaccurately classified as chew, and 17 did not specify TFN use. Only 38 specified TFN use; only 25% (38/150) of records demonstrated concordance.

Conclusion: Only 25% of records were concordant with physician notes, highlighting the need for a designated place for TFN use within social history templates. Nicotine use history is crucial in the setting of microvascular reconstruction and cosmetic surgeries. Thus, accurate reporting is crucial for future research on the long-term effects of TFN. This study's findings underscore a deficit in current social history templates and the need to recognize TFN pouches as distinct entities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烟草之外:弥补无烟尼古丁袋消费者社会历史记录的空白。
目的:含尼古丁的产品历来都是香烟、雪茄和蘸酱等烟草衍生物。最近,无烟尼古丁(TFN)产品作为一种健康的替代品被推向市场。无烟尼古丁小袋是一种含尼古丁的小而隐蔽的调味小袋,可放置在牙龈和嘴唇之间。这种产品不属于传统烟草类别,导致报告不准确。本研究旨在调查医生在记录 TFN 小袋时存在的差异:方法:对 TFN 用户进行回顾性病历审查:地点:单一医疗保健系统:方法:统计分析评估社会病史模板和医生笔记之间的TFN记录一致性:结果:150 名患者使用了 TFN,841 名患者吸食了烟草。吸食记录的一致性高于 TFN 袋记录(55.9%,470/841 对 25.3%,38/150;P 结论:只有 25% 的记录与 TFN 袋记录一致:只有 25% 的记录与医生笔记一致,这说明有必要在社会病史模板中为 TFN 的使用指定一个位置。尼古丁使用史在微血管重建和美容手术中至关重要。因此,准确的报告对于未来研究 TFN 的长期影响至关重要。本研究的发现强调了当前社会病史模板中的不足之处,以及将 TFN 烟袋视为不同实体的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
OTO Open
OTO Open Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Music on Pain and Anxiety During Otolaryngology Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Impact of Language Barriers and Age on English Hearing Test App Accuracy for Polish Users. Epidemiology of Barbell Weightlifting-Related Head and Neck Injuries in the United States: A 10-Year Analysis of National Injury Data. Beyond Tobacco: Bridging Gaps in Social History Records for Tobacco-Free Nicotine Pouch Consumers. Clinical and Histological Differences Between Choanal Polyps in Children and Adults: A 15-Year Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1