The Relationship Between Physical Activity Level and Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Parameters in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Respiratory care Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.4187/respcare.12060
Kubra Kardes, Yunus Emre Tutuneken, Yasemin Buran Cırak, Emine Atıcı, Nurgul Durustkan Elbası
{"title":"The Relationship Between Physical Activity Level and Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Parameters in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Kubra Kardes, Yunus Emre Tutuneken, Yasemin Buran Cırak, Emine Atıcı, Nurgul Durustkan Elbası","doi":"10.4187/respcare.12060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal cord injury (SCI) detrimentally impacts individuals' exercise capacity and respiratory parameters depending on sensory, motor, and autonomic dysfunctions. Regular physical activity (PA) positively impacts cardiovascular health and pulmonary function in these individuals. This study determined the relationship between PA and exercise capacity and respiratory parameters in individuals with SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 40 individuals with paraplegia. Assessments included the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD), 6-min manual wheelchair propulsion test (MWPT<sub>6min</sub>), MWPT slalom test (MWPT<sub>slalom</sub>), 20-m MWPT propulsion test (MWPT<sub>20m</sub>), pulmonary function test (FVC, FEV<sub>1</sub>, FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC, and peak expiratory flow [PEF]), maximum inspiratory pressure (P<sub>Imax</sub>), and maximum expiratory pressure (P<sub>Emax</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Subjects' mean age and body mass index were 46 ± 13 y and 26.8 ± 5.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. PASIPD total score was significantly associated with MWPT<sub>6min</sub> (r = 0.657, <i>P</i> < .001), MWPT<sub>slalom</sub> (r = 0.403, <i>P</i> = .17) and MWPT<sub>20m</sub> (r = 0.477, <i>P</i> = .056), FEV<sub>1</sub> (r = 0.552, <i>P</i> < .001), FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC (r = 0.532, <i>P</i> = .02), PEF (r = 0.683, <i>P</i> = .004), P<sub>Imax</sub> (r = 0.484, <i>P</i> = .01), and P<sub>Emax</sub> (r = 0.481, <i>P</i> = .16). However, PASIPD total score was not significantly associated with FVC (r = 0.168, <i>P</i> = .41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PA level influenced exercise capacity and pulmonary function in individuals with SCI and may play an important role in delimiting physical fitness.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.12060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) detrimentally impacts individuals' exercise capacity and respiratory parameters depending on sensory, motor, and autonomic dysfunctions. Regular physical activity (PA) positively impacts cardiovascular health and pulmonary function in these individuals. This study determined the relationship between PA and exercise capacity and respiratory parameters in individuals with SCI.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 40 individuals with paraplegia. Assessments included the Physical Activity Scale for Individuals With Physical Disabilities (PASIPD), 6-min manual wheelchair propulsion test (MWPT6min), MWPT slalom test (MWPTslalom), 20-m MWPT propulsion test (MWPT20m), pulmonary function test (FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and peak expiratory flow [PEF]), maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax), and maximum expiratory pressure (PEmax).

Results: Subjects' mean age and body mass index were 46 ± 13 y and 26.8 ± 5.2 kg/m2, respectively. PASIPD total score was significantly associated with MWPT6min (r = 0.657, P < .001), MWPTslalom (r = 0.403, P = .17) and MWPT20m (r = 0.477, P = .056), FEV1 (r = 0.552, P < .001), FEV1/FVC (r = 0.532, P = .02), PEF (r = 0.683, P = .004), PImax (r = 0.484, P = .01), and PEmax (r = 0.481, P = .16). However, PASIPD total score was not significantly associated with FVC (r = 0.168, P = .41).

Conclusions: PA level influenced exercise capacity and pulmonary function in individuals with SCI and may play an important role in delimiting physical fitness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓损伤患者的体力活动水平与运动能力和呼吸参数之间的关系。
背景:脊髓损伤(SCI)会对人的运动能力和呼吸参数造成不利影响,这取决于感觉、运动和自主神经功能障碍。有规律的体育锻炼(PA)对这些人的心血管健康和肺功能有积极影响。本研究确定了 SCI 患者的 PA 与运动能力和呼吸参数之间的关系:这项横断面研究包括 40 名截瘫患者。评估包括肢体残疾人体力活动量表(PASIPD)、6 分钟手动轮椅推进测试(MWPT6min)、MWPTslalom 测试(MWPTslalom)、20 米 MWPT 推进测试(MWPT20m)、肺功能测试(FVC、FEV1、FEV1/FVC 和呼气流量峰值 [PEF])、最大吸气压力(PImax)和最大呼气压力(PEmax):受试者的平均年龄和体重指数分别为 46 ± 13 岁和 26.8 ± 5.2 kg/m2。PASIPD 总分与 MWPT6min(r = 0.657,P < .001)、MWPTslalom(r = 0.403,P = .17)和 MWPT20m(r = 0.477,P = .056)、FEV1(r = 0.552,P < .001)、FEV1/FVC(r = 0.532,P = .02)、PEF(r = 0.683,P = .004)、PImax(r = 0.484,P = .01)和 PEmax(r = 0.481,P = .16)。然而,PASIPD 总分与 FVC(r = 0.168,P = .41)无明显关联:结论:PA水平影响了SCI患者的运动能力和肺功能,并可能在界定体能方面发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Improving Outcomes for Patients With Tracheostomy Through Implementation of AARC Clinical Practice Guidelines. The Relationship Between Physical Activity Level and Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Parameters in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1