Mark Savill, Lindsay M Banks, Regina Gemignani, Jamie Mouzoon, Bethney Bonilla-Herrera, Matthew L Goldman, Joy Melnikow, Cameron S Carter
{"title":"Barriers to and Facilitators of Effective Behavioral Health Crisis Care Services.","authors":"Mark Savill, Lindsay M Banks, Regina Gemignani, Jamie Mouzoon, Bethney Bonilla-Herrera, Matthew L Goldman, Joy Melnikow, Cameron S Carter","doi":"10.1176/appi.ps.20240281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Expanded funding to support care across the crisis continuum is intended to improve behavioral health outcomes. A greater understanding of how to effectively implement and integrate local crisis care systems has been identified as a research and policy priority. The aim of this study was to explore provider perceptions of the barriers and facilitators associated with implementing effective behavioral health crisis services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with personnel from 15 behavioral health crisis care programs across California. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of peer specialists, clinicians, mental health workers, and program leaders. Interview transcripts were analyzed via an inductive approach to thematic analysis. On the basis of patterns identified in the data, initial codes were developed, reviewed, and combined into overarching preliminary themes and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine crisis care personnel participated. Facilitators of effective crisis care included an optimal crisis service structure, a client-centered approach, engagement with clients' support systems, and collaboration with community partners to link clients to services and enable safe delivery of crisis care. Barriers at the client, program, and system levels were identified, with solutions proposed for each.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The participants identified features of crisis care that could improve program implementation and effectiveness or could help mitigate identified barriers. As states and local municipalities work to implement an integrated system of care across the crisis care continuum, input from frontline providers can be used to support the development of new programs, refine existing services, and inform future directions for research.</p>","PeriodicalId":20878,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric services","volume":" ","pages":"appips20240281"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatric services","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.20240281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Expanded funding to support care across the crisis continuum is intended to improve behavioral health outcomes. A greater understanding of how to effectively implement and integrate local crisis care systems has been identified as a research and policy priority. The aim of this study was to explore provider perceptions of the barriers and facilitators associated with implementing effective behavioral health crisis services.
Methods: The authors conducted semistructured qualitative interviews with personnel from 15 behavioral health crisis care programs across California. Purposive sampling was used to ensure adequate representation of peer specialists, clinicians, mental health workers, and program leaders. Interview transcripts were analyzed via an inductive approach to thematic analysis. On the basis of patterns identified in the data, initial codes were developed, reviewed, and combined into overarching preliminary themes and subthemes.
Results: Twenty-nine crisis care personnel participated. Facilitators of effective crisis care included an optimal crisis service structure, a client-centered approach, engagement with clients' support systems, and collaboration with community partners to link clients to services and enable safe delivery of crisis care. Barriers at the client, program, and system levels were identified, with solutions proposed for each.
Conclusions: The participants identified features of crisis care that could improve program implementation and effectiveness or could help mitigate identified barriers. As states and local municipalities work to implement an integrated system of care across the crisis care continuum, input from frontline providers can be used to support the development of new programs, refine existing services, and inform future directions for research.
期刊介绍:
Psychiatric Services, established in 1950, is published monthly by the American Psychiatric Association. The peer-reviewed journal features research reports on issues related to the delivery of mental health services, especially for people with serious mental illness in community-based treatment programs. Long known as an interdisciplinary journal, Psychiatric Services recognizes that provision of high-quality care involves collaboration among a variety of professionals, frequently working as a team. Authors of research reports published in the journal include psychiatrists, psychologists, pharmacists, nurses, social workers, drug and alcohol treatment counselors, economists, policy analysts, and professionals in related systems such as criminal justice and welfare systems. In the mental health field, the current focus on patient-centered, recovery-oriented care and on dissemination of evidence-based practices is transforming service delivery systems at all levels. Research published in Psychiatric Services contributes to this transformation.