Victoria A Marks, Basil K Williams, Michael S Leapman, Carol L Shields
{"title":"The Association Between Medical Insurance, Access to Care, and Outcomes for Patients with Uveal Melanoma in the United States.","authors":"Victoria A Marks, Basil K Williams, Michael S Leapman, Carol L Shields","doi":"10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the association between insurance status and uveal melanoma (UM) care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with UM from 2004 to 2017. We examined the associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics, specifically insurance status, and UM care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7677 patients, 50% had private, 41% Medicare, 4% Medicaid, 3% other government, and 3% no insurance. Most initially received brachytherapy (66%), followed by enucleation/resection (19%) and other treatment (15%). Compared to private, Medicaid and no insurance were associated with higher odds of late-stage disease presentation (<i>p</i> < .05). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance had higher odds of enucleation/resection and lower odds of brachytherapy versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05 for all). Medicaid and no insurance were associated with lower odds of other treatment versus enucleation/resection (<i>p</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Access barriers to UM care may exist based on insurance status and may be associated with later-stage presentation and more radical treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21702,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2426479","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between insurance status and uveal melanoma (UM) care.
Methods: We utilized the National Cancer Database to identify patients diagnosed with UM from 2004 to 2017. We examined the associations between patient sociodemographic characteristics, specifically insurance status, and UM care.
Results: Of 7677 patients, 50% had private, 41% Medicare, 4% Medicaid, 3% other government, and 3% no insurance. Most initially received brachytherapy (66%), followed by enucleation/resection (19%) and other treatment (15%). Compared to private, Medicaid and no insurance were associated with higher odds of late-stage disease presentation (p < .05). Patients with Medicare, Medicaid, and no insurance had higher odds of enucleation/resection and lower odds of brachytherapy versus enucleation/resection (p < .05 for all). Medicaid and no insurance were associated with lower odds of other treatment versus enucleation/resection (p < .05).
Conclusions: Access barriers to UM care may exist based on insurance status and may be associated with later-stage presentation and more radical treatment.
目的:研究保险状况与葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UM)治疗之间的关联:我们利用国家癌症数据库识别了2004年至2017年期间确诊为葡萄膜黑色素瘤的患者。我们研究了患者社会人口学特征(尤其是保险状况)与 UM 治疗之间的关联:在7677名患者中,50%有私人保险,41%有医疗保险,4%有医疗补助,3%有其他政府保险,3%没有保险。大多数患者最初接受的是近距离放射治疗(66%),其次是去核/切除术(19%)和其他治疗(15%)。与私人保险相比,医疗补助和无保险与疾病晚期发病率较高有关(p p p 结论:获得铀矿治疗的障碍可能因保险状况而存在,并可能与晚期发病和更彻底的治疗有关。
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Ophthalmology offers current, clinically oriented reviews on the diagnosis and treatment of ophthalmic disorders. Each issue focuses on a single topic, with a primary emphasis on appropriate surgical techniques.