[Evaluation of the effectiveness of chemical inactivation and immunogenicity of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus].

Q3 Medicine Voprosy virusologii Pub Date : 2024-11-09 DOI:10.36233/0507-4088-253
G A Zhapparova, B S Myrzakhmetova, T M Tlenchiyeva, A A Tussipova, K B Bissenbayeva, A S Toytanova, L B Kutumbetov
{"title":"[Evaluation of the effectiveness of chemical inactivation and immunogenicity of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus].","authors":"G A Zhapparova, B S Myrzakhmetova, T M Tlenchiyeva, A A Tussipova, K B Bissenbayeva, A S Toytanova, L B Kutumbetov","doi":"10.36233/0507-4088-253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rapid spread of coronavirus infection COVID-19 among the population of many countries around the world has contributed to the emergence of many genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2. Compared to previous coronavirus variants, the new Omicron variants have shown a noticeable degree of mutation. Virus inactivation is one of the most important steps in the development of inactivated vaccines. The chemical inactivation agents currently used are β-propiolactone and formaldehyde, but there is no uniform standard for designing and specifying the inactivation process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluation and comparison of the effectiveness of chemical inactivation of two agents, formaldehyde and β-propiolactone against immunogenicity of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nasopharyngeal swabs were used to obtain the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant virus. Vero cell culture was used to isolate, reproduce, titrate the virus, and perform a neutralization reaction. The kinetics of studying the inactivation of the virus by chemical agents such as formaldehyde and β-propiolactone was carried out.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Studies have been conducted to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of chemical agents used to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus of the Omicron variant, planned for use in the production of an inactivated whole-virion vaccine. Formaldehyde and β-propiolactone were used as inactivation agents in concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5% of the total volume of the virus suspension. It has been established that complete inactivation of the virus by formaldehyde in the concentrations used at a temperature of 37 °C occurs within up to 2 hours, and when using beta-propiolactone, within up to 12 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Inactivated virus samples have different antigenic activity depending on the concentration of the inactivation agents used. The most pronounced antigenic activity is manifested in samples of the pathogen that were treated with an inactivation agent at a mild concentration of 0.05%. Increasing the concentration of inactivation agent by 5 or more times leads to a significant decrease in the antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. With the inactivation modes used, the loss of biological activity of the virus occurs faster and antigenicity is retained largely when treated with formaldehyde.</p>","PeriodicalId":23669,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy virusologii","volume":"69 5","pages":"459-469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy virusologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36233/0507-4088-253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The rapid spread of coronavirus infection COVID-19 among the population of many countries around the world has contributed to the emergence of many genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2. Compared to previous coronavirus variants, the new Omicron variants have shown a noticeable degree of mutation. Virus inactivation is one of the most important steps in the development of inactivated vaccines. The chemical inactivation agents currently used are β-propiolactone and formaldehyde, but there is no uniform standard for designing and specifying the inactivation process.

Objective: Evaluation and comparison of the effectiveness of chemical inactivation of two agents, formaldehyde and β-propiolactone against immunogenicity of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Materials and methods: Nasopharyngeal swabs were used to obtain the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant virus. Vero cell culture was used to isolate, reproduce, titrate the virus, and perform a neutralization reaction. The kinetics of studying the inactivation of the virus by chemical agents such as formaldehyde and β-propiolactone was carried out.

Results: Studies have been conducted to comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of chemical agents used to inactivate the SARS-CoV-2 virus of the Omicron variant, planned for use in the production of an inactivated whole-virion vaccine. Formaldehyde and β-propiolactone were used as inactivation agents in concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5% of the total volume of the virus suspension. It has been established that complete inactivation of the virus by formaldehyde in the concentrations used at a temperature of 37 °C occurs within up to 2 hours, and when using beta-propiolactone, within up to 12 hours.

Conclusion: Inactivated virus samples have different antigenic activity depending on the concentration of the inactivation agents used. The most pronounced antigenic activity is manifested in samples of the pathogen that were treated with an inactivation agent at a mild concentration of 0.05%. Increasing the concentration of inactivation agent by 5 or more times leads to a significant decrease in the antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. With the inactivation modes used, the loss of biological activity of the virus occurs faster and antigenicity is retained largely when treated with formaldehyde.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[评估化学灭活的有效性和 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 Omicron 变体的免疫原性]。
导言:冠状病毒 COVID-19 在世界许多国家的人群中迅速传播,导致出现了许多 SARS-CoV-2 基因变种。与以前的冠状病毒变种相比,新的 Omicron 变种出现了明显的变异。病毒灭活是开发灭活疫苗的最重要步骤之一。目前使用的化学灭活剂有 β-丙内酯和甲醛,但在设计和规定灭活过程方面没有统一的标准:评估和比较甲醛和 β-丙内酯两种化学灭活剂对 SARS-CoV-2 病毒 Omicron 变体免疫原性的有效性:用鼻咽拭子获取 SARS-CoV-2 Omicron 变体病毒。用 Vero 细胞培养分离、繁殖、滴定病毒并进行中和反应。对甲醛和 β-丙内酯等化学试剂灭活病毒的动力学进行了研究:对用于灭活计划用于生产全病毒灭活疫苗的 Omicron 变异型 SARS-CoV-2 病毒的化学制剂的有效性进行了比较评估。灭活剂为甲醛和 β-丙内酯,浓度分别为病毒悬浮液总体积的 0.05%、0.1%、0.5%。结果表明,在温度为 37 ℃ 的条件下,使用不同浓度的甲醛可在 2 小时内完全灭活病毒,而使用β-丙内酯可在 12 小时内完全灭活病毒:结论:灭活病毒样本具有不同的抗原活性,这取决于所用灭活剂的浓度。用 0.05% 的温和灭活剂处理的病原体样本的抗原活性最明显。将灭活剂的浓度提高 5 倍或更多,SARS-CoV-2 病毒的抗原性就会明显降低。在所使用的灭活模式中,病毒生物活性丧失的速度较快,而用甲醛处理时,抗原性基本保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy virusologii
Voprosy virusologii Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: The journal deals with advances in virology in Russia and abroad. It publishes papers dealing with investigations of viral diseases of man, animals and plants, the results of experimental research on different problems of general and special virology. The journal publishes materials are which promote introduction into practice of the achievements of the virological science in the eradication and incidence reduction of infectious diseases, as well as their diagnosis, treatment and prevention. The reader will find a description of new methods of investigation, new apparatus and devices.
期刊最新文献
[Evaluation of the effectiveness of chemical inactivation and immunogenicity of the Omicron variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus]. A preregistered meta-meta-analysis on the global distribution of Hepatotropic Viruses. Comparative analysis of whole-genome sequences of African swine fever virus (Asfarviridae: Asfivirus) isolates сollected on the territory of the left bank of the Dnieper River in 2023. Defective HIV proviruses: possible involvement in the HIV infection pathogenesis. Evaluation of anti-HIV-1 (Retroviridae: Orthoretrovirinae: Lentivirus: Human immunodeficiency virus type 1) activity of 6HP and 3TC in vitro using MT-4 cell line variants with different replicative activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1