Short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of low dose of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate injection for type GOV1 gastric varices combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices.

Tingting Zhang, Chuangyang Xin, Xueyun Guo, Sihai Chen, Xuelian Zheng, Wen Xu, Dongjing Zhang, Biming Li, Ye Chen, Xuan Zhu, Anjiang Wang
{"title":"Short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic injection of low dose of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate injection for type GOV1 gastric varices combined with endoscopic variceal ligation for esophageal varices.","authors":"Tingting Zhang, Chuangyang Xin, Xueyun Guo, Sihai Chen, Xuelian Zheng, Wen Xu, Dongjing Zhang, Biming Li, Ye Chen, Xuan Zhu, Anjiang Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-11393-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To explore the short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic low dose injection of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate for gastric varices (GVs) combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for esophageal varices (EVs) in cirrhosis with type GOV1 varices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 521 patients with cirrhosis and GOV1 varices, who were divided into emergence endoscopy treatment layer and secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding layer, were selected. All patients underwent combined therapy or EVL alone (ligation therapy) for the treatment of type GOV1 varices. The baseline between the two groups with significant differences were used as covariates for 1:1 propensity score matching. The early rebleeding rate was compared and the risk factors for rebleeding were identified in each layer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, a total of 122 patients were included in the emergence endoscopy treatment layer, and 234 patients were included in the secondary prophylaxis layer. The early rebleeding rates in the combined therapy group vs. ligation therapy group was 4.92% vs. 16.39% (P = 0.04) and 2.56% vs. 1.71% (P = 0.65) in the emergency endoscopy layer and in the secondary prophylaxis layer, respectively. The median length of hospital stay after endoscopy was 8 days vs. 9 days (P = 0.004) and 7 days vs. 6 days (P = 0.47), in each layer respectively. There was no significant difference in the adverse reactions of endoscopic treatment. EVL treatment (OR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.05-13.96; P = 0.04) and discontinuation of NSBB (non-selective beta-blocker) use after discharge (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.20-10.67; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopy in the emergency endoscopy layer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combined therapy is comparable with ligation therapy in the short-term efficacy and safety of in cirrhosis patients with secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding while it is superior to EVL alone in cirrhosis in the emergency endoscopy treatment as it could reduce the early rebleeding rate and shorten the length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11393-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To explore the short-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic low dose injection of sclerotherapy and cyanoacrylate for gastric varices (GVs) combined with endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for esophageal varices (EVs) in cirrhosis with type GOV1 varices.

Methods: A total of 521 patients with cirrhosis and GOV1 varices, who were divided into emergence endoscopy treatment layer and secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding layer, were selected. All patients underwent combined therapy or EVL alone (ligation therapy) for the treatment of type GOV1 varices. The baseline between the two groups with significant differences were used as covariates for 1:1 propensity score matching. The early rebleeding rate was compared and the risk factors for rebleeding were identified in each layer.

Results: After propensity score matching, a total of 122 patients were included in the emergence endoscopy treatment layer, and 234 patients were included in the secondary prophylaxis layer. The early rebleeding rates in the combined therapy group vs. ligation therapy group was 4.92% vs. 16.39% (P = 0.04) and 2.56% vs. 1.71% (P = 0.65) in the emergency endoscopy layer and in the secondary prophylaxis layer, respectively. The median length of hospital stay after endoscopy was 8 days vs. 9 days (P = 0.004) and 7 days vs. 6 days (P = 0.47), in each layer respectively. There was no significant difference in the adverse reactions of endoscopic treatment. EVL treatment (OR: 3.84; 95% CI: 1.05-13.96; P = 0.04) and discontinuation of NSBB (non-selective beta-blocker) use after discharge (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 1.20-10.67; P = 0.02) were independent risk factors for early rebleeding after endoscopy in the emergency endoscopy layer.

Conclusion: Combined therapy is comparable with ligation therapy in the short-term efficacy and safety of in cirrhosis patients with secondary prophylaxis for rebleeding while it is superior to EVL alone in cirrhosis in the emergency endoscopy treatment as it could reduce the early rebleeding rate and shorten the length of hospital stay.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜下注射低剂量硬化剂疗法和氰基丙烯酸酯注射液治疗 GOV1 型胃静脉曲张并联合内镜下静脉曲张结扎术治疗食管静脉曲张的短期疗效和安全性。
研究背景目的:探讨内镜下低剂量注射硬化剂和氰基丙烯酸酯治疗胃静脉曲张(GVs)联合内镜下食管静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)治疗肝硬化合并GOV1型静脉曲张(EVs)的短期疗效和安全性:方法:共选取521例肝硬化合并GOV1型食管静脉曲张患者,将其分为急诊内镜治疗层和二次预防再出血层。所有患者均接受了治疗 GOV1 型静脉曲张的联合疗法或单独 EVL(结扎疗法)。两组之间存在显著差异的基线被用作 1:1 倾向评分匹配的协变量。比较了各层的早期再出血率,并确定了再出血的风险因素:经过倾向评分匹配后,共有122名患者被纳入急诊内镜治疗层,234名患者被纳入二级预防层。在急诊内镜治疗层和二级预防层,联合治疗组与结扎治疗组的早期再出血率分别为4.92%对16.39%(P=0.04)和2.56%对1.71%(P=0.65)。各层内镜检查后的中位住院时间分别为8天对9天(P = 0.004)和7天对6天(P = 0.47)。内镜治疗的不良反应无明显差异。EVL治疗(OR:3.84;95% CI:1.05-13.96;P = 0.04)和出院后停用NSBB(非选择性β-受体阻滞剂)(OR:3.58;95% CI:1.20-10.67;P = 0.02)是急诊内镜层内镜术后早期再出血的独立危险因素:联合疗法在肝硬化患者二次预防再出血的短期疗效和安全性方面与结扎疗法相当,而在肝硬化急诊内镜治疗中,联合疗法优于单独的EVL疗法,因为它可以降低早期再出血率并缩短住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
期刊最新文献
Clinical features and risk factors for colorectal gas explosion during digestive endoscopy and surgery: a systematic review. Comparison between robotic-assisted Kasai portoenterostomy and open Kasai portoenterostomy in patients with biliary atresia. Inflammation-attenuating effect of carbon dioxide versus room-air environment in a rat laparotomy model. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy with pancreatic remnant-gastric coverage: a modified technique to reduce postoperative pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh plus (IPOM +) repair versus enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (e-TEP) repair for ventral hernias: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1