Financial toxicity of total cancer care immunotherapy patients and caregivers: impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and inflation.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y
Irene Liang, Djin L Tay, Anne C Kirchhoff, Garrett Schwanke, Lee Ellington, Maria Pisu, Kathi Mooney
{"title":"Financial toxicity of total cancer care immunotherapy patients and caregivers: impacts of COVID-19 pandemic and inflation.","authors":"Irene Liang, Djin L Tay, Anne C Kirchhoff, Garrett Schwanke, Lee Ellington, Maria Pisu, Kathi Mooney","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Financial toxicity, cancer-treatment-related financial harm, is associated with expensive treatments like immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore financial toxicity among advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers and, secondarily, to study how recent inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews about supportive care needs from 2022 to 2023. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity was collected. Guided by Jones et al.'s cancer financial toxicity model, the content analysis was conducted by two trained coders using NVIVO R1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen patients and 10 caregivers (including 7 dyads) across 5 states participated in interviews in 2022-2023. Participants averaged 63.43 years (SD = 12.75), and patients received an average of 14.6 months of immunotherapy (SD = 9.415). The majority lived in non-metropolitan areas (67%) and were white (95%). Three theory-driven themes were developed: (1) Sources of Financial Toxicity, (2) Buffers of Financial Toxicity, and (3) Consequences of Financial Toxicity. Inflation was added to financial toxicity for non-metropolitan dwelling participants due to increased prices of gas and accommodation. Social support systems buffered the impact of financial toxicity. Material and psychological impacts of financial toxicity disproportionately affected younger and privately insured participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While immunotherapy patients face high medical costs of treatment, the burdens of accessing treatment for people living at a distance from the cancer center can exacerbate financial toxicity. Clinicians and researchers should also consider external financial pressures such as national economic impacts that compound the financial toxicity of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 12","pages":"790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-09007-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Financial toxicity, cancer-treatment-related financial harm, is associated with expensive treatments like immunotherapy. The purpose of this study was to explore financial toxicity among advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers and, secondarily, to study how recent inflation and the COVID-19 pandemic impacted these experiences.

Methods: Advanced cancer patients receiving immunotherapies and their caregivers were recruited to participate in semi-structured interviews about supportive care needs from 2022 to 2023. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity was collected. Guided by Jones et al.'s cancer financial toxicity model, the content analysis was conducted by two trained coders using NVIVO R1.

Results: Sixteen patients and 10 caregivers (including 7 dyads) across 5 states participated in interviews in 2022-2023. Participants averaged 63.43 years (SD = 12.75), and patients received an average of 14.6 months of immunotherapy (SD = 9.415). The majority lived in non-metropolitan areas (67%) and were white (95%). Three theory-driven themes were developed: (1) Sources of Financial Toxicity, (2) Buffers of Financial Toxicity, and (3) Consequences of Financial Toxicity. Inflation was added to financial toxicity for non-metropolitan dwelling participants due to increased prices of gas and accommodation. Social support systems buffered the impact of financial toxicity. Material and psychological impacts of financial toxicity disproportionately affected younger and privately insured participants.

Conclusion: While immunotherapy patients face high medical costs of treatment, the burdens of accessing treatment for people living at a distance from the cancer center can exacerbate financial toxicity. Clinicians and researchers should also consider external financial pressures such as national economic impacts that compound the financial toxicity of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症整体护理免疫疗法患者和护理人员的财务毒性:COVID-19 大流行和通货膨胀的影响。
目的财务毒性(与癌症治疗相关的财务伤害)与免疫疗法等昂贵的治疗方法有关。本研究旨在探讨接受免疫疗法的晚期癌症患者及其护理人员的经济毒性,其次研究近期的通货膨胀和 COVID-19 大流行对这些经历有何影响:招募接受免疫疗法的晚期癌症患者及其护理人员参加半结构式访谈,了解他们在2022年至2023年期间的支持性护理需求。收集了财务毒性综合评分。在琼斯等人的癌症财务毒性模型指导下,由两名经过培训的编码员使用 NVIVO R1 进行内容分析:5 个州的 16 名患者和 10 名护理人员(包括 7 对夫妇)参加了 2022-2023 年的访谈。参与者的平均年龄为 63.43 岁(SD = 12.75),患者平均接受了 14.6 个月的免疫治疗(SD = 9.415)。大多数人居住在非大都市地区(67%),为白人(95%)。研究人员提出了三个理论驱动的主题:(1) 金融毒性的来源;(2) 金融毒性的缓冲;(3) 金融毒性的后果。由于天然气和住宿价格上涨,通货膨胀增加了非大都市居民参与者的财务毒性。社会支持系统缓冲了财务毒性的影响。经济毒性的物质和心理影响不成比例地影响着年轻的和有私人保险的参与者:尽管免疫疗法患者面临着高昂的医疗费用,但对于远离癌症中心的人来说,接受治疗的负担会加剧经济毒性。临床医生和研究人员还应考虑外部经济压力,如国家经济影响,这些都会加重治疗的经济毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
KRAS-G12 inhibitors in lung cancer therapy: unveiling the toxicity profile through a pharmacovigilance study. Streptococcus pneumoniae and influenza vaccination rates in oncological patients - data from Germany. Evaluating pain management practices for cancer patients among health professionals in cancer and supportive/palliative care units: a Belgian survey. Incidence and impact of food aversions among patients with cancer receiving outpatient chemotherapy: a one-year prospective survey. Perceptions, facilitators, and barriers of participation for a behavioral weight loss group-based telehealth program for breast cancer survivors: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1