Predicting Calcein Release from Ultrasound-Targeted Liposomes: A Comparative Analysis of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/15330338241296725
Ibrahim Shomope, Kelly M Percival, Nabil M Abdel Jabbar, Ghaleb A Husseini
{"title":"Predicting Calcein Release from Ultrasound-Targeted Liposomes: A Comparative Analysis of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine.","authors":"Ibrahim Shomope, Kelly M Percival, Nabil M Abdel Jabbar, Ghaleb A Husseini","doi":"10.1177/15330338241296725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study presents a comparative analysis of RF and SVM for predicting calcein release from ultrasound-triggered, targeted liposomes under varied low-frequency ultrasound (LFUS) power densities (6.2, 9, and 10 mW/cm<sup>2</sup>).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Liposomes loaded with calcein and targeted with seven different moieties (cRGD, estrone, folate, Herceptin, hyaluronic acid, lactobionic acid, and transferrin) were synthesized using the thin-film hydration method. The liposomes were characterized using Dynamic Light Scattering and Bicinchoninic Acid assays. Extensive data collection and preprocessing were performed. RF and SVM models were trained and evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²), and the a20 index as performance metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RF consistently outperformed SVM, achieving R<sup>2</sup> scores above 0.96 across all power densities, particularly excelling at higher power densities and indicating a strong correlation with the actual data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RF outperforms SVM in drug release prediction, though both show strengths and apply based on specific prediction needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"23 ","pages":"15330338241296725"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11561990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241296725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study presents a comparative analysis of RF and SVM for predicting calcein release from ultrasound-triggered, targeted liposomes under varied low-frequency ultrasound (LFUS) power densities (6.2, 9, and 10 mW/cm2).

Methods: Liposomes loaded with calcein and targeted with seven different moieties (cRGD, estrone, folate, Herceptin, hyaluronic acid, lactobionic acid, and transferrin) were synthesized using the thin-film hydration method. The liposomes were characterized using Dynamic Light Scattering and Bicinchoninic Acid assays. Extensive data collection and preprocessing were performed. RF and SVM models were trained and evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R²), and the a20 index as performance metrics.

Results: RF consistently outperformed SVM, achieving R2 scores above 0.96 across all power densities, particularly excelling at higher power densities and indicating a strong correlation with the actual data.

Conclusion: RF outperforms SVM in drug release prediction, though both show strengths and apply based on specific prediction needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测超声靶向脂质体的钙黄绿素释放:随机森林与支持向量机的比较分析。
研究目的本研究比较分析了 RF 和 SVM 在不同低频超声(LFUS)功率密度(6.2、9 和 10 mW/cm2)条件下预测超声触发靶向脂质体释放钙黄绿素的方法:采用薄膜水合法合成了负载钙黄绿素的脂质体,并以七种不同的分子(cRGD、雌酮、叶酸、赫赛汀、透明质酸、乳糖酸和转铁蛋白)为靶标。利用动态光散射和双喹啉酸测定法对脂质体进行了表征。进行了广泛的数据收集和预处理。使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、平均平方误差(MSE)、决定系数(R²)和 a20 指数作为性能指标,对 RF 和 SVM 模型进行了训练和评估:结果:RF 的性能始终优于 SVM,在所有功率密度下的 R2 得分都超过了 0.96,尤其是在较高的功率密度下表现尤为突出,并且与实际数据具有很强的相关性:结论:在药物释放预测方面,RF 的表现优于 SVM,但两者都有各自的优势,并可根据具体预测需求进行应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
期刊最新文献
A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach Prognostic Value of IGFBP6 in Breast Cancer: Focus on Glucometabolism The Antimicrobial Peptide Merecidin Inhibit the Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Obstructing EMT via miR-30d-5p/Vimentin Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count on the Efficacy of Treatment with Camrelizumab in Combination with Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatitis B-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Retracted: “CRISPR/Cas9: A Revolutionary Genome Editing Tool for Human Cancers Treatment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1