The effective duration of systemic therapy and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict the surgical advantage of primary tumor resection in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer: a retrospective study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY World Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03586-0
Rie Sugihara, Hidetaka Watanabe, Shuntaro Matsushima, Yuriko Katagiri, Shuko Saku, Mina Okabe, Yuko Takao, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Etsuyo Ogo, Fumihiko Fujita, Uhi Toh
{"title":"The effective duration of systemic therapy and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict the surgical advantage of primary tumor resection in patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer: a retrospective study.","authors":"Rie Sugihara, Hidetaka Watanabe, Shuntaro Matsushima, Yuriko Katagiri, Shuko Saku, Mina Okabe, Yuko Takao, Nobutaka Iwakuma, Etsuyo Ogo, Fumihiko Fujita, Uhi Toh","doi":"10.1186/s12957-024-03586-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary tumor resection (PTR) of de novo stage IV breast cancer (DnIV BC) is controversial, and previous studies have suggested that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be a poor-prognosis factor for BC. We investigated PTR's surgical advantage related to clinical outcomes, the surgery timing in responders to systemic therapy, and whether the NLR can predict the benefit of surgery for DnIV BC.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the cases of the DnIV BC patients who received systemic therapies and/or underwent PTR at our institution between January 2004 and December 2022. Blood tests and NLR measurement were performed before and after each systematic therapy and/or surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty patients had undergone PTR local surgery (Surgery group); 81 patients had not undergone surgical treatment (Non-surgery group). In both groups, systemic treatment was performed as chemotherapy (95%) and/or endocrine therapy (92.5%) (p < 0.0001). The groups' respective median progression-free survival (PFS) durations were 88 and 30.3 months (p = 0.004); their overall survival (OS) durations were 100.1 and 31.8 months (p = 0.0002). The Surgery-group responders to systemic therapy lasting > 8.1-months showed significantly longer OS (p = 0.044). The PFS and OS were significantly associated with the use of postoperative systemic therapy (p = 0.0012) and the NLR (p = 0.018). A low NLR (≤ 3) was associated with significantly better prognoses (PFS and OS; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A longer effective duration of systemic therapy (> 8.1 months) and a low pre-surgery NLR (≤ 3.0) could predict PTR's surgical advantage for DnIV BC. These variables may help guide decisions regarding the timing of surgery for DnIV BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"22 1","pages":"300"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03586-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary tumor resection (PTR) of de novo stage IV breast cancer (DnIV BC) is controversial, and previous studies have suggested that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) could be a poor-prognosis factor for BC. We investigated PTR's surgical advantage related to clinical outcomes, the surgery timing in responders to systemic therapy, and whether the NLR can predict the benefit of surgery for DnIV BC.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the cases of the DnIV BC patients who received systemic therapies and/or underwent PTR at our institution between January 2004 and December 2022. Blood tests and NLR measurement were performed before and after each systematic therapy and/or surgery.

Results: Sixty patients had undergone PTR local surgery (Surgery group); 81 patients had not undergone surgical treatment (Non-surgery group). In both groups, systemic treatment was performed as chemotherapy (95%) and/or endocrine therapy (92.5%) (p < 0.0001). The groups' respective median progression-free survival (PFS) durations were 88 and 30.3 months (p = 0.004); their overall survival (OS) durations were 100.1 and 31.8 months (p = 0.0002). The Surgery-group responders to systemic therapy lasting > 8.1-months showed significantly longer OS (p = 0.044). The PFS and OS were significantly associated with the use of postoperative systemic therapy (p = 0.0012) and the NLR (p = 0.018). A low NLR (≤ 3) was associated with significantly better prognoses (PFS and OS; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: A longer effective duration of systemic therapy (> 8.1 months) and a low pre-surgery NLR (≤ 3.0) could predict PTR's surgical advantage for DnIV BC. These variables may help guide decisions regarding the timing of surgery for DnIV BC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统治疗的有效持续时间和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值可预测新发 IV 期乳腺癌患者原发肿瘤切除术的手术优势:一项回顾性研究。
背景:新发IV期乳腺癌(DnIV BC)的原发肿瘤切除术(PTR)存在争议,之前的研究表明中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)可能是BC的不良预后因素。我们研究了 PTR 的手术优势与临床结果的关系、对全身治疗有反应者的手术时机以及 NLR 是否能预测 DnIV BC 的手术获益:我们回顾性分析了2004年1月至2022年12月期间在我院接受系统疗法和/或PTR治疗的DnIV BC患者病例。在每次系统治疗和/或手术前后进行血液检测和NLR测量:60例患者接受了PTR局部手术(手术组);81例患者未接受手术治疗(非手术组)。两组患者均接受了化疗(95%)和/或内分泌治疗(92.5%)(P 8.1-月显示OS显著延长(P = 0.044))。PFS和OS与术后系统治疗的使用(p = 0.0012)和NLR(p = 0.018)明显相关。低 NLR(≤ 3)与明显较好的预后相关(PFS 和 OS;p 结论:NLR 越低,预后越好:较长的系统治疗有效期(> 8.1 个月)和较低的术前 NLR(≤ 3.0)可预测 PTR 对 DnIV BC 的手术优势。这些变量可能有助于指导有关 DnIV BC 手术时机的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer patients: a retrospective, comparative study. Establishing a preoperative predictive model for gallbladder adenoma and cholesterol polyps based on machine learning: a multicentre retrospective study. Division of the inferior pulmonary ligament during upper lobectomy does not improve postoperative pulmonary function: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Risk factors for lymphatic leakage following radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Efficacy comparison of optimal natural orifice specimen extraction for robotic middle rectal cancer resection in women: transanal or transvaginal orifice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1