Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2024-10-20 DOI:10.1177/17511437241292190
James Ward, Isis Terrington, Katie Preston, Alexander Smith, Thomas Roe, Jonathan Barnes, Emma Allen, Sandra Lima, Rebecca Cusack, Michael P W Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan
{"title":"Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey.","authors":"James Ward, Isis Terrington, Katie Preston, Alexander Smith, Thomas Roe, Jonathan Barnes, Emma Allen, Sandra Lima, Rebecca Cusack, Michael P W Grocott, Ahilanandan Dushianthan","doi":"10.1177/17511437241292190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mechanical ventilation is a common and often lifesaving intervention that is utilised in intensive care. However, the practices can vary between centres. Through this national survey we aim to gain more information about different strategies adopted across the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All adult intensive care units in the UK were approached to participate. The questionnaire was developed with an electronic survey engine and conducted between 09/11/2023 and 01/04/2024 (Survey Monkey<sup>®</sup>). The survey included questions on ventilator modes, settings, protocols/pathways, rescue strategies, immediate post-extubation period and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 196 responses from 104 hospitals. The most widely adopted start-up ventilation mode was pressure-regulated volume-controlled mode. For acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), most of respondents reported full (39.8%) or partial compliance (58.1%) with the ARDSnet protocol, with PEEP settings being the commonest deviation. Prone positioning (99.0%), followed by recruitment manoeuvres (91.3%) were commonly used rescue measures during AHRF. APRV (55.7%), inhaled (51.3%) and systemic pulmonary vasodilators (44.1%) were also commonly used. Conservative oxygen targets (SaO<sub>2</sub> of 88%-92%) were commonly adopted (70.6%). As a care bundle, intermittent ETT cuff pressure monitoring was more common (65.5%) than continuous cuff pressure monitoring (20.0%). Propofol and alfentanil were the most common initial sedative and analgesia (99.5% and 56.9%) respectively. Routine volatile anaesthetic use was rare.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey has shown significant variation of practice in common but crucial elements of management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. We hope the results in our survey highlight potential future areas of research.</p><p><strong>Collaborators: </strong>South-coast Peri-operative Audit and Research Collaborative (SPARC)Severn Trainee Anaesthetic and Critical Care Research group (STAR)Collaborative research in Anaesthesia in the Northeast (CRANE).</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437241292190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11556611/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241292190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mechanical ventilation is a common and often lifesaving intervention that is utilised in intensive care. However, the practices can vary between centres. Through this national survey we aim to gain more information about different strategies adopted across the UK.

Methods: All adult intensive care units in the UK were approached to participate. The questionnaire was developed with an electronic survey engine and conducted between 09/11/2023 and 01/04/2024 (Survey Monkey®). The survey included questions on ventilator modes, settings, protocols/pathways, rescue strategies, immediate post-extubation period and follow-up.

Results: There were 196 responses from 104 hospitals. The most widely adopted start-up ventilation mode was pressure-regulated volume-controlled mode. For acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure (AHRF), most of respondents reported full (39.8%) or partial compliance (58.1%) with the ARDSnet protocol, with PEEP settings being the commonest deviation. Prone positioning (99.0%), followed by recruitment manoeuvres (91.3%) were commonly used rescue measures during AHRF. APRV (55.7%), inhaled (51.3%) and systemic pulmonary vasodilators (44.1%) were also commonly used. Conservative oxygen targets (SaO2 of 88%-92%) were commonly adopted (70.6%). As a care bundle, intermittent ETT cuff pressure monitoring was more common (65.5%) than continuous cuff pressure monitoring (20.0%). Propofol and alfentanil were the most common initial sedative and analgesia (99.5% and 56.9%) respectively. Routine volatile anaesthetic use was rare.

Conclusions: Our survey has shown significant variation of practice in common but crucial elements of management of patients receiving mechanical ventilation. We hope the results in our survey highlight potential future areas of research.

Collaborators: South-coast Peri-operative Audit and Research Collaborative (SPARC)Severn Trainee Anaesthetic and Critical Care Research group (STAR)Collaborative research in Anaesthesia in the Northeast (CRANE).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人机械通气患者的管理:英国范围内的调查。
背景:机械通气是重症监护中常用的一种干预措施,通常可以挽救生命。然而,不同中心的做法可能有所不同。通过这项全国性调查,我们希望获得更多有关英国各地所采取的不同策略的信息:我们联系了英国所有的成人重症监护病房。调查问卷由电子调查引擎开发,在 2023 年 11 月 9 日至 2024 年 4 月 1 日期间进行(Survey Monkey®)。调查内容包括呼吸机模式、设置、规程/路径、抢救策略、拔管后即刻治疗和随访等问题:共有来自 104 家医院的 196 份回复。最广泛采用的启动通气模式是压力调节容量控制模式。对于急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭(AHRF),大多数受访者表示完全(39.8%)或部分(58.1%)遵守 ARDSnet 协议,其中 PEEP 设置是最常见的偏差。俯卧位(99.0%)和招架动作(91.3%)是 AHRF 期间常用的抢救措施。APRV(55.7%)、吸入式(51.3%)和全身性肺血管扩张剂(44.1%)也很常用。通常采用保守的氧目标(SaO2 为 88%-92% )(70.6%)。作为护理捆绑包,间歇性 ETT 袖带压力监测(65.5%)比持续性袖带压力监测(20.0%)更常见。丙泊酚和阿芬太尼是最常用的初始镇静剂和镇痛剂(分别占 99.5% 和 56.9%)。常规使用挥发性麻醉剂的情况很少见:我们的调查显示,在对接受机械通气的患者进行管理的过程中,一些常见但至关重要的因素在实践中存在很大差异。我们希望我们的调查结果能突出未来潜在的研究领域:合作者:南部沿海围手术期审计与研究合作组织(SPARC)塞文麻醉与重症监护受训人员研究小组(STAR)东北部麻醉合作研究组织(CRANE)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey. Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial. Should viscoelastic testing be a standard point-of-care test on all intensive care units?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1